TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Miro

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Miro

Connect with Miro

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Miro so that Miro and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Figma

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AFigma, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their collaborative design and prototyping application to support digital product and UI development.

    $15

    per month per editor

    Miro

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AMiro is a web-based Collaborative Whiteboard platform that provides teams with an infinite digital canvas for visual planning, diagramming, and workflow mapping. The platform integrates a spatial user interface with automated drawing tools and natural-language processing (NLP) to structure freeform ideas into defined project workflows and database schemas.

    $10

    per month per user

    Pricing
    FigmaMiro
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $144
    per year
    Organization
    $540
    per year
    Starter
    Free
    1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
    $0
    2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
    $8
    per month (billed annually) per user
    3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
    $16
    per month (billed annually) per user
    4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
    contact sales
    annual billing per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FigmaMiro
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsMonthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FigmaMiro
    Considered Both Products
    Figma
    Chose Figma
    I would use Figma for sure for any product design you need, for any marketing or visual illustrations related to a product or business. Even if the navigation between files/folders and within the design is not the best, the capabilities and focus on designing are the best in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    It's up there - but needs tweaking to ensure. We were forced to move to Figma, but it's a great tool nevertheless. Miro offers usability functions for novice users that Figma is still not fully up to speed on. Miro's overall templates are more appealing, and AI usage in Miro is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Miro is more user-friendly than Figma, but is less robust in terms of web prototyping and graphic design. While Figma isn't made to be used as a design tool, our team has taken to using it as such because it's richer in functions and personalizations compared to Miro and Figma.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    I think Figma is better because it's easier to create more visually appealing work. I would say that Figma is better for people who are used to using this sort of visual design software/platform. Whereas I think Miro is better for first time users, it doesn't offer as many …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    In Figma I can make websites and apps. With Miro I can brainstorm about how I want the app to be and what my ideas are.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    I believe when it comes to prototyping and visualisation I would say Figma is way better than above mentioned tools. However, when it comes to workshops, brainstroming exercises and running sessions, I feel Miro might be better as compared to figjam and Mural. Figma is quite …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma stands out against Adobe XD in that it is better in every way, easier to use and with more advanced tools that allow for greater customization of components and efficiency when designing. While Figma is not a 1:1 of Miro, the white boarding tool, it does have some overlap …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Adobe XD is an absurd copycat that never got to have even 10% of Figma's features. It's hyper fast because it's native, but that's the only good thing it has.

    Axure RP is an excellent prototyping software, with Local Variables and complex interactions. But it's also extremely …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Compared to Adobe XD, the Figma tool is much easier to use, offers more features, and has a much lower cost. Its features are less complex, making it very easy to teach beginners how to use it. The navigable prototype is also easier and more efficient to share in Figma compared …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma easily wins against Adobe XD. Asset sharing on XD was a pain. Figma makes it really easy by allowing you to export any layer as an asset. XD had no comments making it incredibly hard to communicate with the designer in remote settings. XD's prototyping system was not good …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    I prefer using Figma the most so far during the past several years over tools like JustInMind and/or UX Pin.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Way better than all of them. Ease of use, aesthetic, modern feel, ability to invite people in.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    I prefer to use it comparing to Adobe XD. It surely is more intuitive and still develops itself providing new features (e.g. variables; however, I had to get used to the new interface). Now, if I had to compare it to Axure it'd depend on the project I'm working on. In case of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is the go-to design tool that can be pushed to production very easily with developer tools. In my opinion it's the most complete design tool that considers the entire design process including the creation of solid design systems, high-fidelity prototyping, user testing, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is the best for collaborative work. Very easy to learn, so easy that most people dont use it properly (which is good and bad at the same time). Prototyping is where I'd wish it will improve. Axure was awesome.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is way better than Adobe Illustrator because of its ability to seamlessly integrate multiple use cases like mobile design and vector-based shape building. While Adobe Illustrator is great for adding texture and depth to illustration you can still build high-end …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma has more features than Zeplin or Axure. Unlike Zeplin it allows to create and share dynamic prototypes. Unlike Axure it gives tools to create detailed designs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma covers all our use cases. It helps with our design systems, pattern libraries, and prototyping; it's helpful to be cloud-based and sharable. Its plugins and usability for all team members make it very useful. Autolayout functionality is head and shoulders above the rest …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma blows these out the park. Adobe's system is very different, and I think this shows in their attempted acquisition of Figma. I've not used Sketch or Invision, but their lack of market presence says a lot—designers like using the best tools. Axure is definitely more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is often considered superior to Sketch and Adobe XD due to its web-based nature, enabling seamless cross-platform compatibility and real-time collaboration. While Sketch is limited to macOS and Adobe XD offers robust features, Figma's ability to work directly in the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Previously, we were using more than 1 tool for a specific use case related to design needs, but learned that Figma was more comprehensive, thus we were able to reduce usage of 2+ tools into one saving our overall budget on UX tools. Figma also seems to be an industry-wide …
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Better performance or Multiplatform availability when compared to competition.
    Also easiness of use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    no comparison.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    In theory it can do the all the things these other apps offer. And it does to a certain extend. if your prototypes are not too complex it can completely remove the need for other prototyping software. Through Figjam presentation and collaboration, alternatives provide no extra …
    Incentivized
    Miro
    Chose Miro
    Miro is simpler than Figma without sacrificing many features. It has also been much easier for me to share Miro boards with teammates who may not have Miro installed. With Figma, we'd often encounter issues when sharing a board with non-Figma users. Aside from getting signed up …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro stacks below Figma for me. I only selected Miro because that is what my company uses. However, I think they chose Miro over Figma because they are more interested in collaborative features than in the prototyping that Figma prioritizes. They also probably chose Miro …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We also evaluated tools such as Figma, Notion, and Jamboard for diagram creation. While those tools are useful, Miro provides a better overall experience for workflow diagrams and project planning. because Miro is offering a large variety of templates, easy-to-use collaboration …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro was used by default in our organization. I would not mind either whether it is Figma or Miro. I am not sure if I used Miro stacks up.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    1. As for Figma, I think Miro is easy to work with when we are innovating and learning new things while sharing ideas in a team when we are just shooting out the ideas for the projects.
    2. Whimsical, I felt was more rigid, like ux is not smooth, and we need to search for the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I still use Figma when I need to collaborate with my design team, because that's where their data lives. I used to work for Lucid Software, so I started out using them. While I prefer their slick shortcuts for adding content, they did not have robust integrations, which is what …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is much quicker and easier to use. I also like how Miro able to show more ideation visualization and research. Figma and Canva feel like they are specific to designing final assets. With Miro I am not designing assets to be exported, but using the space to ideate.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro's strength is it's specialty - Atlassian Confluence has so many different features that the whiteboards and real-time collaboration do not stack up against Miro's focused, curated UIX. Figma does a good job bridging the gap between design and engineering, but for overall …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I use both for different things really. Figma is better for design and prototype applications with coding being enabled in Figma (which isn't part of Miro's tools). As I said earlier, I use other programmes when there is a lack in Miro, in this case the coding element.
    Also …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Figma is more design, Miro is a simple tool for diagramming
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Jamboard (RIP)
    I like the interface and additional functionality better on Miro than in Mural
    Figma is great, but it's a little more than I need (I'm not a designer). I can get what I need for it from Canva.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I have been using these products and Miro is somewhat simpler in terms of usage and understanding level
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is powerful when it comes to transforming ideas into action.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is much more user-friendly than the other programs I have used in the past. I am not in the decision-making role at my organization, so I only use the programs that are installed, but I am very thankful that Miro is the workflow product of choice for my company.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Easiness to learn and to use, even if you never used Miro before.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I just think Miro's interface design and usage is better than figJams, it just feels and work better
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    More creative
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro allows for a more collaborative, intuitive, and easy-to-use experience for several purposes. It's also very flexible for it's use cases.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Has lost of versatile templates and excellent tools for visual collaboration .
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I like Miro for its all-in-one and how I can organize my projects in an easy way
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It is the only one that offers a set of connected tools. I can plan here, but I can also do valuable stuff on the same platform.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Since I haven't used any other product but I must say it is difficult to switch from Miro. It is not only that it can be used in the organization only. You can utilise it in your day to day life as well. Just like your sidekick. Whatever things you are discussing can be saved …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    In my opinion, Miro stacks up Very poorly
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    204 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    6203 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    179 Answers
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    4109 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    198 Answers
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    6246 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    99%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    123 Answers
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    2539 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    142 Answers
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    2715 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    FigmaMiro
    Small Businesses
    Proto.io
    Score7 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    UXPin
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Marvel
    Score9 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FigmaMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (209 ratings)
    9.0
    (6391 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    9.2
    (199 ratings)
    Usability
    7.9
    (41 ratings)
    8.5
    (772 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (24 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (24 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.1
    (17 ratings)
    7.1
    (71 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    5.9
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (11 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (3660 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (19 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (4001 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (24 ratings)
    Professional Services
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    6.9
    (12 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    7.1
    (13 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FigmaMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Figma
    I would recommend if you need to start from scratch a product UI or any customer journey that you need to implement that requires designing and visualizing different steps to complete a process. I would recommend that any design/UI/UX team brainstorm and make proposals that they can compare and discuss in a visual way.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    We work on a lot of materials across different media. Sketches could be on real paper and later scanned, or on iPad and photoshops. Prototypes could be digital CAD models or 3D-printed models and later captured with cameras. Renderings be in another programs. So having Miro as whiteboard and being able to put all kind of materials (in forms of pictures or links) in one place and arrange them in a structural way is a huge productivity advantage for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Figma
    • Figma allows us to create universal content. This means that if multiple designers want to re-use a piece of content, and if everyone's content should be dynamically updated from time to time, we can easily accomplish this by turning design elements into a universal instance. Then, if an update is needed, we can push the change out to all assets at once. It's very efficient and ensures we're all updating content accordingly.
    • Figma also allows us to set parameters for the company's brand guide and share them across various designers. This way, we can easily pull from approved brand fonts, colors, and more, which allows our assets to remain unified across multiple touchpoints.
    • Figma also allowed us to create and install our own plugin, which we use to export every slide we have in a frame at one time, versus the default export feature, which limits you to one slice at a time. This is particularly useful for us when we're working on email templates, since we tend to have a ton of slices in any given series.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
    • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
    • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
    • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Figma
    • It will be great if Figma will consider having the Pages where interactions can be stitched together among the Pages and not just one page with so many Frames to create the stand-alone clickable prototype that can be used to simulate the intended UX
    • Bring back the Inspect Mode tab right on the right-side panel of the main workspace instead of hiding behind the Dev Mode.
    • Figma Slides feature could be improved quite a bit more in order to be easier to assemble slides into a presentation deck and having pre-built templates for slides can be useful too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Sometimes locating information on a bigger board is quite difficult as the information starts to look less sorted. So there can be a little bit of improvement in terms of bigger boards
    • Complex features are hard to navigate and implement without a proper hand. A little bit of intuitivity can help fix that, especially for beginners
    • In my opinion, a few more formatting tools for a legal workflow would really be a great add on
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Figma
    Figma is a pretty cool tool in many areas. My team almost uses it on daily basis, such as, brainstorming on product/design topics, discussing prototypes created by designers. We even use it for retrospectives, which is super convenient and naturally keeps records of what the team discusses every month. Furthermore, I do see the potential of the product - currently we mainly use it for design topics, but it seems it is also a good fit for tech diagrams, which we probably will explore further in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Figma
    There's a bit of a learning curve, but generally I think it's both more powerful and intuitive that other UX design tools. Most of what I need to do as a designer can be done in this platform, from basic wireframes to creating a design system, to creating pixel perfect designs, to prototyping to dev handoff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    What elevates usability for me is how easily the software keeps everyone on the same page during the live session. When a team member is explaining a complex diagram, I can simply click on their avatar to instantly track their cursor and see the exact same perspective they are looking at, which is awesome.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Figma
    The only regret I have is, its not available when there is no internet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Figma
    I think its great, As there are many other software or systems which can be integrated with it as plugins or API's
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Figma
    I haven't used their support lately but in the past, they had a chat that I used often. They often responded in a few hours and were able to give a satisfactory solution. I would imagine it's less personal now but the community has expanded drastically so there are more resources out there to self serve with a bit of Google magic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Figma
    In-person training has its own benefits - 1. It helps in resolving queries then and there during the training. 2. I find classroom or in-person training more interactive. 3. Classroom or in-person training could be more practical in nature where participants can have an hands on experience with tools and clarify their doubts with the trainer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Figma
    Online training has its own merits and demerits - 1. Sometimes we may face issues with connectivity or the training content 2. The way training is being delivered becomes very important because not everyone is comfortable taking online training and learning by themselves. 3. With the advancement of technology online training has become popular but there is a segment of people who still prefer class-room training over online one.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Figma
    Miro is more user-friendly than Figma, but is less robust in terms of web prototyping and graphic design. While Figma isn't made to be used as a design tool, our team has taken to using it as such because it's richer in functions and personalizations compared to Miro and Figma.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I like that Miro is something that anyone from any department can pick up, use and understand. You do not need specific domain knowledge. Miro has clean UI so running complex exercises becomes easier and can be easily shared across tools/platforms. Managing large number of participants on Miro is easier. FigJam on the other side is simpler and suits the needs of quick and simple brainstorm
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Figma
    I think this is great and as I mentioned at ADP we use Figma extensively whether by designers, researchers or content writers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Figma
    • Allows us to get funding for further phases of the project (which is uncountable)
    • Well, it lets us show off when needed due to well suited UI-oriented character
    • Easily approachable by anyone (browser use)
    • User friendly interface
    • More advanced cooperation requires some of the users to have a license
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Miro has helped increase productivity within teams because all the brainstorming, planning, and collaborative tasks can now be done within one tool.
    • Conversations about projects and decision-making processes are now quicker, allowing teams to plan and document their work much faster.
    • Working remotely has become much better because everyone can collaborate through Miro, eliminating communication gaps.
    • It has become easier to create documentation and follow up on meetings, saving time during the process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Miro Screenshots

    Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.