What users are saying about
11 Ratings
Top Rated
848 Ratings
11 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100
Top Rated
848 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)

    HPE OneView

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    8.3

    Microsoft Azure

    83%
    Microsoft Azure ranks higher in 9/9 features

    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.6
    86%
    14 Ratings

    Dynamic scaling

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.5
    85%
    14 Ratings

    Elastic load balancing

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.2
    82%
    14 Ratings

    Pre-configured templates

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.7
    77%
    14 Ratings

    Monitoring tools

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.1
    81%
    14 Ratings

    Pre-defined machine images

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.2
    82%
    13 Ratings

    Operating system support

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.4
    84%
    14 Ratings

    Security controls

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.9
    89%
    14 Ratings

    Automation

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.3
    83%
    13 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • HPE OneView is rated higher in 2 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Support Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    9.0

    HPE OneView

    90%
    3 Ratings
    8.1

    Microsoft Azure

    81%
    87 Ratings

    Likelihood to Renew

    HPE OneView

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    10.0

    Microsoft Azure

    100%
    15 Ratings

    Usability

    HPE OneView

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.7

    Microsoft Azure

    87%
    28 Ratings

    Availability

    HPE OneView

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    6.8

    Microsoft Azure

    68%
    4 Ratings

    Support Rating

    9.4

    HPE OneView

    94%
    4 Ratings
    8.8

    Microsoft Azure

    88%
    47 Ratings

    Implementation Rating

    HPE OneView

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0

    Microsoft Azure

    80%
    4 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    HPE Oneview has come along way. When they first put it out it was next to useless. Over the years and versions, they listened to feedback and have made OneView into a truly enterprise-level robust management product. It is now a far better product than the old C7000 Blade OAs, and HP SIM. It makes management of hardware easy and makes much of the maintenance easier and safer than before. For the storage side it does a great job and is intuitive to use, but the very versatility of how you can do things can lead to issues if multiple engineers do things differently.
    Read full review

    Microsoft

    In terms of cloud computing, Microsoft Azure is the only comprehensive result the company offers. Regardless of how big or small an organization is, it can make use of this system. As a cyber-security professional, this is your best option for data management. A business that wants to minimize capital expenditures can use Microsoft Azure. Many Microsoft services accept it. People with little or no knowledge of cloud computing may find it impossible. It isn’t the solution for companies that don’t want to risk having only one platform and infrastructure vendor.
    Read full review

    Pros

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    • It is software-defined automation which helps you replicate the same configuration of HPE on other servers
    • Provides possible solutions to the alert which is very helpful while fixing the issue
    • A single click and interactive user interface
    Read full review

    Microsoft

    • Azure simply provides end to end life cycle. Starting from the development to automated deployment, you will find [a] bunch of options. Custom hook-points allow [integration] on-premise resources as well.
    • Excellent documentation around all the services make it really easy for any novice. Overall support by [the] community and Azure Technical team is exceptional.
    • BOT Services, Computer Vision services, ML frameworks provide excellent results as compare to similar services provided by other giants in the same space.
    • Azure data services provide excellent support to ingest data from different sources, ETL, and consumption of data for BI purpose.
    Read full review

    Cons

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    • Adding in the functionality to control multiple devices like the 3PAR san or Nimble san.
    Read full review

    Microsoft

    • In our experience, Azure Kubernetes Survice was difficult to set up, which is why we used Kubernetes on top of VMs.
    • Azure REST API is a bit difficult to use, which made it difficult for us to automate our interactions with Azure.
    • Azure's Web UI does a good job of showing metrics on individual VMs, but it would be great if there was a way to show certain metrics from multiple VMs on one dashboard. For example, hard drive usage on our database VMs.
    Read full review

    Pricing Details

    HPE OneView

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    HPE OneView editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Microsoft Azure

      Starting Price

      $29 per month

      Editions & Modules

      Microsoft Azure editions and modules pricing
      EditionModules
      BasicFree1
      Developer$292
      Standard$1003
      Professional Direct$10004

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      The free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account.

      Likelihood to Renew

      Hewlett Packard Enterprise

      No answers on this topic

      Microsoft

      Moving to Azure was and still is an organizational strategy and not simply changing vendors. Our product roadmap revolved around Azure as we are in the business of humanitarian relief and Azure and Microsoft play an important part in quickly and efficiently serving all of the world. Migration and investment in Azure should be considered as an overall strategy of an organization and communicated companywide.
      Read full review

      Usability

      Hewlett Packard Enterprise

      No answers on this topic

      Microsoft

      Microsoft Azure's overall usability has been better than expected. Often times vendors promise the world, only to leave you with a run-down town. Not the case with our experience. From an implementation perspective, all went perfect, and from the user-facing experience we have had no technical issues, just some learning curve issues that are more about "why" than "how"
      Read full review

      Reliability and Availability

      Hewlett Packard Enterprise

      No answers on this topic

      Microsoft

      It has proven to be unreliable in our production environment and services become unavailable without proper notification to system administrators
      Read full review

      Support Rating

      Hewlett Packard Enterprise

      Support and training when we implemented OneView were excellent. We haven't required any additional support since we put it in and configured it for our systems. The OneView systems have been stable through updates and HPE documentation is excellent.
      Read full review

      Microsoft

      Support is easy with all the knowledge base articles available for free on the web. Plus, if you have a preferred status you can leverage their concierge support to get rapid response. Sometimes they’ll bounce you around a lot to get you to the right person, but they are quite responsive (especially when you are paying for the service). Many of the older Microsoft skills are also transferable from old-school on-prem to Azure-based virtual interfaces.
      Read full review

      Implementation Rating

      Hewlett Packard Enterprise

      No answers on this topic

      Microsoft

      As I have mentioned before the issue with my Oracle Mismatch Version issues that have put a delay on moving one of my platforms will justify my 7 rating.
      Read full review

      Alternatives Considered

      Hewlett Packard Enterprise

      Our infrastructure is all HP and it is always nice to use the OEM tools in order to get the best optimized results.
      Read full review

      Microsoft

      As I continue to evaluate the "big three" cloud providers for our clients, I make the following distinctions, though this gap continues to close. AWS is more granular, and inherently powerful in the configuration options compared to [Microsoft] Azure. It is a "developer" platform for cloud. However, Azure PowerShell is helping close this gap. Google Cloud is the leading containerization platform, largely thanks to it building kubernetes from the ground up. Azure containerization is getting better at having the same storage/deployment options.
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Hewlett Packard Enterprise

      • No impact one way or the other for us.
      Read full review

      Microsoft

      • Brings down Capex to customers.
      • Some of the built-in security features of DDoS Basic protection that comes with VNET on Azure or even WAF on AGW brings huge advantages to customers.
      • Hybrid benefits for those who have software assurance can save even more costs by moving to Azure.
      Read full review

      Add comparison