Merative Clinical Development

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Merative Clinical Development	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	IBM Clinical Development (formerly eClinicalOS) is a cloud-based electronic data capture (EDC) system.	N/A

Pricing

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Merative Clinical Development
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

Additional Details

Subscription - For larger organizations and those who need a predictable budget. Most modules included without incurring additional fees. Eligible for volume discounts. Pay per use - For organizations that need flexibility without a long term contractual commitment. Transparent a la carte pricing, no minimums. Fees start when trial goes live.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Merative Clinical Development
Considered Both Products	Merative Clinical Development Verified User Director Chose Merative Clinical Development More flexibility with IBM Clinical Development, less heavy to design and offer[s] strong feature[s]. Rave is a stronger EDC system with a very interesting reporting option and a very good reputation with the users, however very heavy to manipulate from the design side. Incentivized Helpful? JL Jose Leon zone Manager Chose Merative Clinical Development It was easier to understand the usability of the software [ICD]. For our engineers [it] was easier to migrate our data, and fully set up everything. We found out that comparing other software[s], this one is safe, easy to use, has more functionalities, [and it's] easier to work … Incentivized Helpful? AG Alex Gatenby Design Manager Chose Merative Clinical Development IBM Clinical Trail offers an improvement on the above as it is considerably easier to navigate and has many more features. The side did seem faster however and could be used via an app which is useful in a busy environment. Both are around the same price bracket give or take. Incentivized Helpful? NK Nicholas Kutil Clinical Data Manager Chose Merative Clinical Development IBM is as good or better than Rave. I believe that IBM has a more friendly user interface and is easier to navigate on the designer and Site side. CRF build and study build in general appears to be easier and IBM can be used for almost any kind of clinical study that Rave can … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Professional Chose Merative Clinical Development I have used Clindex, Oracle Clinical, MediData, and MS Access for clinical trials. The product I had the most success with was Clindex but ICD was a close second. I did not select ICD as it was being used when I joined the company. I became a developer within a few months so I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Merative Clinical Development IBM Clinical Development (ICD) supersedes the Medrio EDC at any given point of time and on all evaluation criteria. Also as compared to Medidata Rave EDC, database programming is easier due to its intuitive GUI; someone with little or absolutely no knowledge of any programming … Incentivized Helpful? Raul E. Lopez Manager Data Management Chose Merative Clinical Development IBM Clinical Development has an easier set-up, maintenance and modifiability. Also, there is a cost saving when using IBM CD for a study as Medidata is very expensive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Employee Chose Merative Clinical Development IBM Clinical Development (ICD) supersedes the Medrio EDC at any given point of time and on all evaluation criteria. Also as compared to Medidata Rave EDC, database programming is easier due to its intuitive GUI and someone with little or absolutely no knowledge of any … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Merative Clinical Development rave, medrio Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Merative Clinical Development Similar database use is mainly study specific. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Professional Chose Merative Clinical Development I haven't got an opportunity to evaluate any products. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose Merative Clinical Development ICD system runs faster, easier to use. Helpful? AC ANDY CHANG MANAGER Chose Merative Clinical Development IBM Clinical Development (ICD) is selected by the sponsor and it is less expensive than other systems. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Merative Clinical Development IBM CD is a fast database, doesn't cause waiting during the data entry or when saving the data. This is mostly appreciated by the site staff as they have limited time and any delay is crucial for them. IBM CD has an unlimited option for edit checks that helps collect accurate … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Employee Chose Merative Clinical Development Electronic data management system which is Abbott owned system. The system cannot be currently used outside of Abbott. Incentivized Helpful? AK Alina Krasny Sr. Clinical Data Analyst Chose Merative Clinical Development The selection was made by previous stakeholders based on IBM Clinical Development suitability to handle medical device data and costs. Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Data capture Pro Easy to use Pro Data integration
Top Cons	Minus Bit confusing Minus Page design Minus Requires improvement

User Ratings
	Merative Clinical Development
Likelihood to Recommend	8.4 (20 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.1 (2 ratings)
Usability	8.2 (19 ratings)
Availability	8.2 (1 ratings)
Performance	7.3 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	8.6 (20 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.2 (2 ratings)
Configurability	8.2 (1 ratings)
Ease of integration	7.3 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	7.3 (1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	7.3 (1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	7.3 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Merative Clinical Development
Likelihood to Recommend	Merative ICD is a good tool for companies currently utilizing multiple software platforms to create and monitor clinical trial information. Due to the price, it is best suited for large pharmaceutical manufacturers with active pipelines and high R&D spend. ICD's value is more limited to smaller, more focused companies. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Merative Study build process is relatively easy to learn, and there are many tools within the system to help builders throughout the process. Outstanding support - both technical / Helpdesk (with system features and capabilities) and project management. Each organization has their own Client Success Manager, and ours is doing an excellent job. Periodical enhancements based on the users/clients/s feedback. Training materials are very well prepared and organized. AK Alina Krasny Sr. Clinical Data Analyst Read full review
Cons	Merative We cannot have multiple study accesses for a study in the studies supported by IBM clinical. eg. Coder and Data manager. Though all the study-build related errors are flagged on the study-build page, some errors like incorrect dynamics applied, which eventually affects the subject PDF extraction, reports, etc. When the study is imported from another IBM studies, certain attributes remain running in the background even if it seems to be disabled. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Merative We are satisfied from our experience with IBM, the close collaboration we have with the ICD team is also something we value. We plan to use ICD for a long time Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Merative IBM has many different functionalities as well as modules that can be used depending on what the sponsor wants. I like that they are optional so that when building a study, you can give the sponsor options if they want them or not. Many of the optional models I like to use (Training Tracking for example) as they make tracking Site training so much easier than sending training forms out Incentivized NK Nicholas Kutil Clinical Data Manager Read full review
Reliability and Availability	Merative available when needed Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Performance	Merative some audit reports are difficult to download and take time subject pdf also takes some time to download Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Merative ICD's support team is phenomenal. They are quick to answer or indicate that they need to research to provide an answer. There are some things that they cannot do which we can be annoying but we deal with it (visit windows). I have been very happy with the support team. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Online Training	Merative very efficient self training Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	Merative again not sure about it, I wasn't part of our organization yet Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Merative It was easier to understand the usability of the software [ICD]. For our engineers [it] was easier to migrate our data, and fully set up everything. We found out that comparing other software[s], this one is safe, easy to use, has more functionalities, [and it's] easier to work with team members everywhere making clinical trials more efficient. Incentivized JL Jose Leon zone Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	Merative Time savings regarding how long it takes to make an EDC Live. Reduced EDC Go Live time by at least half (from 60 days to 30). Was able to take an EDC live in 14 days on a few occasions. Seamless RTSM IRT integration without adding time to Go Live. Incentivized Raul E. Lopez Manager Data Management Read full review
ScreenShots	Merative Clinical Development Screenshots