Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs. Parallels Device Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
German company Matrix42 offers the Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management, which combines mobile security and endpoint management with traditional client management.N/A
Parallels Device Management
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Parallels Device Management enables users to centrally administer PCs, iPhones and iPads, including Mac management, with a simple plug-in. The vendor states the solution: Extends Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (MECM) for unified device administration. Improves IT performance, reducing duplicate work and incident resolution time. Is straightforward to deploy, requiring no additional infrastructure or training.N/A
Pricing
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Citrix Endpoint Management
Citrix Endpoint Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
Citrix Endpoint Management
Citrix Endpoint Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Matrix42
Matrix42 is best suited for the environment where we need to manage the both, mobile devices and endpoints like laptops and desktops. This solution have the best compatibility with every type of endpoints and the functionalities and features are incredible. The dashboard gives the overall visibility and details needed for a endpoint. We can see what applications are running as well as services which are running. It supports multi OS. It is not well suited for environment where only laptop and desktop needs to be managed as we can have other solution in less price. For just managing the workstations like laptops it may be not the best tool as the functionalities will be limited as compared to other vendors in this price.
Read full review
Alludo
We had a medium size fleet of macbook pros that we had deployed and had parallels already installed on them. We looked into a way to standardize and track these devices and started looking into Parallels as a solution to help us with this. Parallels was a good fit due to the fact that most of these machines already had the base system already installed
Read full review
Pros
Matrix42
  • It has the ability to manage endpoints like mobile devices as well as laptops and desktops. Hence through single tool we are able to control every type endpoint which is the best feature so far.
  • It supports every operating system like windows, mac OS , Linux, android, Chromebook OS hence it got the multivendor support.
  • Every endpoint can be managed through a single dashboard hence it gives the best user experience.
  • The dashboard is very user friendly and every function is clearly visible. We do not need to go into sub menu for detailing.
  • The dashboard is totally customizable and gives the ability to control the endpoint in the best way.
Read full review
Alludo
  • Central location for management via Webv
  • Existing ecosystem for our mac users
  • Trust and transparent set up from normal operations
Read full review
Cons
Matrix42
  • The deployment and implementation process took very long as we encountered some bugs in the OS and every time installation got failed due that. It took so long to understand that which delayed the process so we moved to n-2 version. Hence, in new OS bug should be removed for smooth configuration and installation.
  • The reporting part need to be improved as it is very basic and do not carry much information which is needed for auditing purpose. It should be made customizable and more type of reporting format should be introduced. So this the area of improvement.
  • Third Party integration is not possible. This feature is lacking. For proper visibility and control management it should have functionality of third party integration so that we can take control action for non complaint system.
Read full review
Alludo
  • It can be a bit difficult with a large fleet of computers
  • Can be a bit hard to troubleshoot if there are issues
  • There are other tools that are cheaper that do the same thing albeit not as well
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Matrix42
Matrix42 Unified endpoint management supports different type of endpoints as well as multi OS is also supported which make it different from other vendors. The product got some good features which is needed for organization and during the demo it met our requirement and it was in our budget if we compare to other vendors. The solution delivers what it promises and hence proven to very useful for organization. Microsoft and Citrix TAC was also not good and supportive as we faced issue some issue during POC
Read full review
Alludo
We looked at a product called virtual box to do something similar to what we saw from Parallels but it was much more manual for us to deploy out the tool and we would have had to do a lot more work to manage all the systems we have in the fleet
Read full review
Return on Investment
Matrix42
  • The product helped to achieve good profit as is it helps in managing the endpoints from remote which lowers the on site engineer cost.
  • The ROI for this product is 75-80 percent as it is a agent based solution and deploying agent in a large environment is painful hence to achieve the full ROI will take lot of time.
  • The solution is proven to be best for our organization as it helped to maintain the compliance of our organization be verifying the necessary application needed for the organization to make it secure.
Read full review
Alludo
  • Easy to deploy out to our fleet
  • quick turn around time to provision with parallels
  • ease of use from end user perspective
Read full review
ScreenShots