MCA Suite vs. Norada Solve360

It is a good tool for smaller companies entering the MCA space, but doesn't scale all that well, and provides limited options for reporting customization.

Incentivized

If you're working with a lot of clients and are working in one field Norada is perfect. I found it difficult to configure it to work precisely as I want to for a multi-field company that offers two very different products whose sales teams should never meet, yet know about each other.

• They have lots of detail on the deal pages.
• It allows for multiple internal and external users.
• It has global search functionality.

Incentivized

• Contact database.
• Integrated communications and communication history across projects.
• Task lists and objectives.

• Poor reporting.
• Filtering is clunky.
• They could improve on data visualization.
• Renewal advances that are not refinances are difficult to manage.

Incentivized

• More advanced filters for tasks.
• More advanced project organization elements.

I have received fast answers to any questions I have ever had. The support staff knows how to work with less tech-literate people and is patient enough to explain. Even if my issue was not solvable the support staff gave me another way to get the job done.

We haven't used any others.

Incentivized

• We've been able to grow our working capital program over the years with the help of MCA Suite.
• Data management is difficult, and we struggle with reporting.
• We have granted merchants dedicated to their advances for tracking purposes.

Incentivized

• Easy to keep track of client needs.
• Easy to work in a team with the same client base.
• Easy to organize work.