Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
SAP Concur
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
SAP Concur is a SaaS expense report management product, and handles corporate travel booking, expense report automation, reimbursement, audit, and business intelligence, and corporate card integration.
$9
per month
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics SLSAP Concur
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Concur Travel and Expense
$9.00
per report (average price)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics SLSAP Concur
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics SLSAP Concur
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP

No answer on this topic

Microsoft Dynamics SL
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew.
We did try Great …
SAP Concur

No answer on this topic

Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics SLSAP Concur
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
14% above category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.319 Ratings9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.915 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
21% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
API for custom integration2.526 Ratings6.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.021 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
4% above category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability5.832 Ratings7.49 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.240 Ratings10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
9% above category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Dashboards3.529 Ratings8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.239 Ratings8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.539 Ratings8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
40% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.445 Ratings6.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.936 Ratings6.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.436 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.741 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.531 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.014 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.628 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.919 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.026 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.314 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings6.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.918 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.726 Ratings3.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.916 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting4.017 Ratings8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.814 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.219 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.5
26 Ratings
48% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking6.224 Ratings5.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management4.018 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.515 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
23% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Pricing3.618 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry3.621 Ratings3.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing1.012 Ratings7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.225 Ratings7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.39 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.812 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.47 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
27% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Billing Management00 Ratings6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings6.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings2.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
16% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
21% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
18% below category average
SAP Concur
-
Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense Management
Comparison of Expense Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
SAP Concur
8.2
493 Ratings
1% below category average
Employee Expense Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3485 Ratings
Corporate Card Reconciliation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.2367 Ratings
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
SAP Concur
8.2
428 Ratings
3% above category average
Customizable Approval Policies00 Ratings00 Ratings8.1371 Ratings
Financial Document Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.5315 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking00 Ratings00 Ratings8.4371 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail00 Ratings00 Ratings8.2342 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection00 Ratings00 Ratings7.6303 Ratings
Advanced OCR00 Ratings00 Ratings8.0258 Ratings
Electronic Funds Transfer00 Ratings00 Ratings8.4244 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics SLSAP Concur
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.1 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Dext
Dext
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Precoro
Precoro
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
Emburse Chrome River
Emburse Chrome River
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics SLSAP Concur
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(51 ratings)
5.0
(18 ratings)
8.2
(853 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
5.4
(8 ratings)
8.2
(40 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(7 ratings)
3.0
(7 ratings)
8.5
(113 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.9
(2 ratings)
8.3
(13 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
7.9
(10 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
9.5
(4 ratings)
8.3
(41 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.9
(6 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
7.9
(13 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(7 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(57 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
1.4
(2 ratings)
8.6
(56 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(8 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(7 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics SLSAP Concur
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Microsoft
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
Read full review
SAP Concur
SAP Concur is great for large organizations because of it's built in approval process functions. It is great tool for expense reports and any company where employees need to book travel. I imagine that the tool would be more tricky to use for those who are less technically savvy since there are many tabs and it is sometimes tricky to navigate.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
  • Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
  • A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
  • Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
  • Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
  • Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
Read full review
SAP Concur
  • Self service and easy to navigate
  • Available on all mobile devices
  • Provides travel options such as airlines for the destination with several options
  • Automatically define check in and check out dates and time for hotels
  • Reminds users to book other travel related activities
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
  • I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
  • Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
Read full review
SAP Concur
  • For a new user of SAP Concur, it becomes difficult to file the first reimbursement as that person is new to the application and probably, one needs to to go through the instructions to get used to it. So, user interface can be improved and could be tried to make more interactive. Other than that, it's all good to go.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Microsoft
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
Read full review
SAP Concur
Now that we are fully on Concur, switching is not an option. Concur has become ingrained in our expense reporting process. Furthermore, Concur continues to improve its offering. Each month, they release updates and changes, many of which were client requested. Concur's constant evolution means it is adapting with my business
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Microsoft
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
Read full review
SAP Concur
I think it is very easy to use, especially once you are acquainted with it. I think the UX could be improved so some things, like accessing old reports, are more intuitive once you learn it though it is not difficult to replicate.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Read full review
SAP Concur
In prior years I would have given them a 9.5 for availability. Unfortunately in 2015 so far this rating has dropped to a 7 overall.
We have experienced far too many interruptions - from admins to employees who rely on it for day to day booking of travel and submission of expense reports. Server errors, slow system response time and spinning wheels are too common place. Those things should be a rare occurrence, not a daily interruption.

While Conur still has great product offerings overall, they are currently not offering world class or best in class product (and customer service) availability. Remaining hopeful they step up and get their A game going again soon.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP Concur
Performance-wise, it's good, loads pages quickly, and reports are highly accurate and easy to understand. Also, we can generate custom reports as needed, and we have integrated with a few other apps, and we have not seen any downgrade in performance.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Microsoft
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
Read full review
SAP Concur
I have never had to use customer support when using Concur Expense - the UX could be a bit nicer on the eyes or easier to understand, but there have never been any problems when using Concur Expense that I have had to ask or reach out to customer support to help me with anything.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP Concur
My Seniors were the ones who taught me about Concur. Concur Support team has sent me training links and answered me in their tickets too. Usually they are helpful and knows their stuff. There are times when webex meetings is conducted for reporting training. They were very patient and took down all the details from me.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP Concur
I can use it after that training, so it fits the purpose.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Microsoft
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
Read full review
SAP Concur
There are different implementation teams for each module of the product you purchase, so implementation is not a 'one size fits all' environment. Also, the different implementation teams have different ways of doing things, so Concur could stand some standardization and streamlining in this area. A Project Manager can make or break an implementation so don't be scared to ask for a new one if things are rocky.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Microsoft
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
Read full review
SAP Concur
Expensify and Zoho Expense work for small and mid-size businesses. Big multinationals do not receive benefits from the apps. Coupa is good as a solution for organizations with non-SAP leading systems. If you plan to use SAP ERP as the main/lending system then SAP Concur is the best solution, mainly for its native integration with SAP ecosystem.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Microsoft
Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
Read full review
SAP Concur
This program has been very helpful, user friendly and has been a great asset to use to assist with time management. Not only are leadership involved with using this program but all staff as well. This is also a great way to hold each accountable. Easy startup with not many means for hands on training
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Microsoft
  • More time is spent on manipulating reports which can and should be automated.
  • Lack of electronic invoicing process and other green technology features creates more cost on printing and storage costs.
  • The lack of a user friendly interface requires more training and a bigger learning curve for staff.
Read full review
SAP Concur
  • Concur's automation has produced impressive efficiency improvements, which have decreased the time and effort required for expense management.
  • Manual errors and policy violations have decreased, which has led to cost savings.
  • We now adhere to corporate regulations better, which lowers risks thanks to Concur's policy compliance checker.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Concur Screenshots

Screenshot of a picture of a receipt snapped from a smartphoneScreenshot of analytics from SAP ConcurScreenshot of the integrated travel and expense applicationScreenshot of the SAP Concur mobile app