Overview
What is ReadyAPI?
ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro) is a REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in…
ReadyAPI - An easy to use tool with lots of built in functionality.
ReadyAPI - the first choice for API automation
API testing made simple
ReadyAPI
Speeding up QA tasks
ReadyAPI : Good Tool
Software QA Manager
To ReadyAPI or Not
Single Effective Solution for Various Aspects of API Development, Validation and Testing!
Features of ReadyAPI Over Other Prodcuts
ReadyAPI - quick, easy and highly functional
ReadyAPI review
ReadyAPI - Must have tool for API testing
Our main objective is to test services across many environments, also we …
My ReadyAPI experience
- It is used by my project
- It helps us with automating our APIs
Great product, if you're willing to put the work in
When new functionality is implemented and is exposed via …
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
What is ReadyAPI?
ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro) is a REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in their CI/CD pipelines without needing to…
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
16 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Rapise?
Rapise is a software testing platform that allows users to regression test web, desktop and mobile applications. Some key features include: Playback of Tests, Test Script Editing and Data Driven Testing.
What is Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)?
Tricentis' solution for testing ServiceNow workflows, Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow, is a scoped application within the user's Now Platform, boasting a familiar interface equipped with a centralized dashboard to view test plans, suites, cases, and results.
Product Demos
Demo Session: API and Webservices Testing and Automation Using SoapUI, ReadyAPI and Groovy
ReadyAPI + Groovy: Data Driven tests with Rejseplanen’s API - Demo
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is ReadyAPI?
ReadyAPI Integrations
ReadyAPI Competitors
ReadyAPI Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(154)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
SoapUI and its Pro version, ReadyAPI, are widely used tools for integrating, verifying, and testing web services. They are highly scalable and configurable, allowing for custom test script creation and automation of various test activities. Users have found SoapUI useful in validating complex analysis platforms, establishing baselines for customization, and verifying APIs across multiple products with different interfaces like SOAP, REST, AMF, and JDBC.
Yahoo's Technical Account Management team relies on SoapUI to analyze SOAP messages and troubleshoot issues with ad platforms. Developers, integrators, and technical product managers use SoapUI for testing, automation, and support purposes. ReadyAPI is the go-to tool for API testing, making it easy to create and manage tests. It helps in verifying breakages, tracing back problems to ensure correct data returns, validating endpoint functionality, and load testing with specific scenarios using production data.
ReadyAPI supports API testing throughout the digital transformation process from prototyping to deployment. It is also used for API test automation and integration with Jenkins. Moreover, it assists in importing and structuring web services, API mockups, functional testing, security testing, deploying code to the cloud using containers, and integrating with third-party tools like Bamboo. With its comprehensive features for SOAP and REST service testing, ReadyAPI is recommended for a wide range of API testing needs.
Swagger Integration: Many users have praised the ability of SoapUI and ReadyApi to read in endpoints for a restful web service via a Swagger page or definitions file. This feature has been described as extremely helpful, with reviewers appreciating the time-saving aspect of not having to figure things out directly or rely on specs to build their requests. Additionally, the ability to easily update endpoints when they change was seen as a valuable feature.
Groovy Functions: Users have found the addition of groovy functions in SoapUI and ReadyApi to be very useful. They appreciate being able to use a programming language with Java libraries, which provides them with much more flexibility in how they process results and build follow-up requests.
Auto-generation of Test Cases: The auto-generation of test cases in SoapUI Pro has received high praise from users. It gives them a good head start on their testing efforts by building a set of tests that cover at least the happy path scenarios. Users also appreciate the visual guide provided by the test case GUI, which helps them structure their suites and scenarios effectively.
Cons:
- Lacking User Interface and Experience: Some users have found SoapUI's user interface to be confusing, old-fashioned, and not user-friendly. They have expressed the need for enhancements in terms of design and usability.
- Slow Performance: Several users have experienced slow performance with SoapUI, particularly when loading projects, switching between tabs, and during startup. They have also encountered errors related to insufficient memory, resulting in frustration and delays.
- Limited JMS Support and Third-Party Tools Dependency: Users have mentioned that SoapUI relies on an outdated 3rd party program called HermesJMS for JMS interactions. This limitation restricts their ability to run parallel test suites efficiently. Additionally, they have pointed out the limited support for JMS and the need for third-party tools for AMF method discovery.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-25 of 31)ReadyAPI - the first choice for API automation
- Scriptless
- Data driven testing
- API Reporting dashboard
- Security and Performance testing
- Run Test suites in parallel
- Property Transfer
- Only supports Groovy script
- Licensing cost
- Limited options available to generate data using Data source
API testing made simple
- It makes API automation seamless, easy, and efficient.
- Performance testing, distributing load, and key performance indicators are very well put together to help improve the performance of APIs.
- Even non-programmers can quickly ramp up and write efficient automation tests.
- Such a good tool and I love it. There are many open-source tools that do the same and are free.
- Adding visuals to show chaining or dependent apis will be helpful.
- Adding contract testing feature to the toolset will improve the value immensely.
Speeding up QA tasks
- Generating test data
- Reusability of test steps
- Flexibility on creation of assertions
- Running big batches of tests can break the application or freeze the UI interaction
- Creation of result reports
- Version control is not possible (branching, merging, etc.)
Software QA Manager
- allows for data driven testing
- allows functional tests to be run at a project, test suite, and test case level, making it very flexible
- security testing is made quick and easy
- The copy/paste functionality in the requests, results and data source grids has been lost and does slow down work.
- The tool is memory heavy and memory usage could be improved.
- I have some long calls that "work" but don't respond before the UI times out. These are requests I am using to stuff variables for the subsequent requests. It should be possible to extend the wait time of the tool, as long as the Request is working.
To ReadyAPI or Not
- data validation
- load testing
- endpoint availability
- change ability between the free and paid version
- better tutorials
- better bulk processing
Single Effective Solution for Various Aspects of API Development, Validation and Testing!
- API contract validation
- API load testing by simulating simultaneous virtual users
- External credentials validation
- RestAPI interfacing and testing
- Clarity in API call failures
- Better UI
ReadyAPI - Must have tool for API testing
Our main objective is to test services across many environments, also we need scripts to generate data, etc. That's why we started using ReadyAPI, which has different environment support and is easily changed in one click. ReadyAPI also supports Groovy scripts and WSDL.
ReadyAPI is a great tool to create test steps and their flows also has a nice assertions system.
- Multi Environment Support
- Several test cases and its flows management
- Scripts support
- Complex assertion system
- GIT, Jenkins, Docker Support
- Dark Mode
- Simple test cases copy paste functionality
- Changing several assertions same time
The disadvantage of ReadyAPI is that sometimes it's not stable and it crashes and if your changes are not saved, it's all lost. I would love to see a recovery feature added to it. Also, it doesn't have dark mode support which really strains my eyes.
My ReadyAPI experience
- It is used by my project
- It helps us with automating our APIs
- Saves time, manual effort and repetition
- Available plugins, though some I know are not yet supported
- It has a good logging mechanism
- UI needs to be improved. It's sometimes unstable.
- Plugin for Jira Cloud available, but not supported. This creates confusion
- For me, takes very long time to launch.
Feeling good while working on ReadyAPI, but yes, a few points for improvements are there.
- Its drag n drop feature is easy to use.
- Data generator in data source is one of the best features of ReadyAPI
- Hierarchy of arranging test suites/cases/steps helps a lot in managing the stuff
- Should be able to add test step like REST even when there's no API added in the project.
- Its integration with GIT is very annoying, especially when you want to delete uncommitted changes and pull latest.
- Sometimes ReadyAPI made some changes of its own. These are also very annoying.
- Automated suites for regression and smoke.
- Integration with GIT and other majorly known repo.
- Integration of CICD with DEVOPS and other services.
This application is being used across multiple projects for building Regression/Functional Testing suite and load testing as well.
- Easy to use.
- Reporting.
- Creation of test cases.
- Adding validation.
- Execution.
- Execution on multiple environments with less/no changes.
- More helpful documents.
- Use of multiple scripting language (adding code ) for validation.
- Performance when steps or projects grows in a workspace.
2. Performance degrades, when steps grows or multiple projects are added in a workspace.
3. Version support, in case someone is using older version, the application stops proper execution. A pop up should be shown with the changes in newer version.
4. Also, updating version sometimes removes our prior many changes.
5. Sometimes even though we save steps etc., the same is not saved and need to redo it.
Let's Get the API Ready
- Create virtualised services
- Test the APIs and integrate in CI CD pipelines
- Development teams use to define the skeleton of services along with OpenAPI / Swagger
- Usability of GUI screens can be improved
- Sharing of API projects across teams, similar to Postman, can be implemented
Nice tool to automate API functional testing
- Functional test automation
- WYSIWYG interface for data driven testing
- Matured product
- Can extend functionality with scripting
- Need phone support
- More examples of groovy script for advanced users
- Decrease load time
- Ability to connect to Google Sheets as data source/data sink
Easy to start API test automation tool
- Easy to use user interface
- Lot of inbuilt controls to easily do API test automation
- Good reporting
- Easier way to integrate with Jenkins
- Needs good documentation
- Need to improve the performance of the tool
- Setup is very complex and for such [a] commercial tool, it should easy and straightforward
- Tool says it supports security testing but in reality, it is not at an extensive level.
- SoapUI Pro helped us with asynchronous testing of the web services.
- Helped with our testing with data from databases and various files.
- Tad bit expensive than their competitors.
- No helpful with Web UI Testing and mobile app testing.
- I like the way this app keeps my projects organized. We have many different services, and I would hate to have to reload each one each time it is needed.
- I am a big fan of this app, but I must admit it does not always render thoroughly on all monitors. I have not taken the time to figure this out, but at times the image is just too small to read. I switch it to a different monitor, and it always works out.
Fast debugging/testing for a better product
- Organization of different endpoints and environments.
- Easiness of use.
- Quickly debug issues with endpoints.
- Some times the UI freezes and I lose all my data.
- Dated UI.
- Autosave option.
SOAP UI tool is simply the best for any organization
- Can be used to test all WEB API calls
- All rest calls with an association with DataPower or Stone Bond can be tested efficiently.
- Can store your work so that it can be picked up next time.
- Would be nice if it stored the results of each call.
- UI can be redesigned to give user-friendly exp compared to Postman.
Soap UI for Technical Product Managers and Business Analysts
- Easy to see all possible methods of a web service, easy to create many different possible requests.
- The formatted view makes it easy to see the whole request and response.
- It's easy to share via colleagues including all possible trials.
- Some features could be added via add ons like an HTTP monitor, test runner, some artifacts. With them, it becomes a big installation (modularity).
- Sometimes it takes some time to open the interface; it is important to have a faster interface in today's applications.
- It could include input and output beautifiers - this would make users happy because they may use this feature heavily while they are making documentation.
API testing using SOAPUI
- Create test cases and test suites for testing API's
- Test both SOAP and REST web services.
- Test runners for running automated jobs.
- It can be made more user-friendly, beginner users struggle to use the interface. For example, learning how to add request headers for different types.
- Hermes JMS is slow for testing MQ services and struggled to use SOAPUI over other message queue tools.
SOAUI NG Pro- Best in the industry.
- Full Support for SOAP Services Testing. It will help you to create envelopes and headers to satisfy WS-Security, WS-Addressing etc.
- The wide range of assertion options. If you are still not satisfied, you can write your own assertion with the help of Groovy script and can use any Java library to do so.
- The Maven Support. You can simply export a TestSuite from SOAP UI and run it from outside on your CI/CD tool (i.e. Jenkins, Gitlab etc) with the help of Maven.
- The User Interface of SOAPUI is very oldish.
- Sometimes it acts weird, like if you change/remove any header in the request it will not go away until you restart SOAP UI. So the changes does not reflect immediately. I guess is something with UI only.
- Can add basic assertion like JSON match, XML Match , Json Schema Validation etc.
Best tool to exchange the XML form data
- Provide support to fully test newly developed web services.
- Easy GUI interface which helps to add customers' credentials easily while using web service.
- An easy way to get a response through with the help of auto-created request XML.
- It should add more GUI option which can show syntax error while adding new request XML.
- Adding credentials is a little bit confusing as it does not show any hit.
- It should allow sending the null value in request XML tags.
SoapUI, Your Mileage May Vary (YMMV)
- Ability to read in endpoints for a restful web service via a Swagger page of definitions file. You don't have to figure things out directly or rely on specs to build out your requesrs. When the endpoints change, just reread swagger.
- The addition of groovy functions is very useful. The ability to use a programming language with Java libraries gives you much more flexibility in how you process results and build followup requests.
- Auto generation of testcases. Soapui can give you a good head start on your testing by building a set of tests that will at least give you the happy path scenarios.
- Test case gui in the pro edition is a nice visual guide to how your suites and scenarios are structured.
- Xml tests. It's just painful to update these things from a source control standpoint.
- UI can really slow you down if you're an sdet type tester. If you're used to building code that works directly with apis, building automation with this can feel cumbersome. You're doing things visually and it just can feel inhibiting, due to the strict structure of the ui.
- Documentation feels incomplete, disjointed. It is difficult to get to certain details of the groovy language functions. JMeter is an open source, free tool...finding info on its internal beanshell libraries is much easier.
- Some of the flow among endpoint/request discovery, test case creation and test run execution is not intuitive.
- Getting environment variables, globals, per suite and test case settings also feels cumbersome. With the nice tree structure for testcases and suites in the ui, you'd expect the same for globals and environment settings.
- Cost for pro license...seems a bit much for an annual license, if you are only getting a couple of licenses.
SoapUI: The best available test tool for Web Services.
For example, we have OSS projects that provide public RESTful API to higher layers such as GUI portals, and at the same time use private API of many sub systems such as AAA, NMS, JMS, ACS and so on. Most of our private web services are based on SOAP or JSON.
For above reasons, SoapUI became a vital part of our testing and automation activities. We use SoapUI (both free and pro versions) for extensive regression testing, data-driven smoke tests, Mocking web services and even sometime for a quick load & performance test.
- SoapUI NG Pro is a prefect tool for setting up complicated test cases with many steps including parameterized Web Service requests, response assertions, data generators, data sources, data sinks (report recorders) and more
- You can use Groovy or JavaScript for more complicated automation such as validating the results, extracting data, using external Java libraries or running system processes. Groovy IDE is compatible with Java and you can easily write your code in Java with very few modifications.
- SoapUI enables you to run multiple test suites in parallel or in a loop, and provide user friendly reports including all test case results and test case coverage.
- SoapUI NG Pro lets you to perform security test against your web services with predefined scenarios such as xml bombing, xml injection, sql injection, buffer overflow tests, monkey testing and so on.
- SoapUI NG Pro, offers a simple but practical solution for low to medium load testing scenarios. You can obtain many more Load and Performance testing features by extending your license with purchasing LoadUI Pro.
- For JMS interactions, SoapUI relies on HermesJMS which is a 3rd party program and outdated. You can not easily run parallel tests suites when JMS sessions are involved.
- SoapUI can easily cover LDAP for both testing and data-driven purposes but this feature is not provided yet.
- As of 2015, SmartBear Software is enforcing the Pro users to use their All-in-One integrated platform: Ready!API . This tool is very slow in comparison with the SoapUI itself. For example, loading a project takes up to 15 seconds in a decent computer, so does clicking on different tabs for the first time.
SoapUI must have tool for developers in SOA
- Functional Testing including Test Coverage, Multi-environment Support, Complex Scenarios & Debugging
- Automated API Load & Performance Testing
- SoapUI NG Pro has features like test history, comparing the test results between previous runs(s).
- Input Data should be configurable with more supported formats. There should be some way to read Excel or csv files then build the input. This will make it more automated.
- In Load & Performance testing threads segregation should be more configurable.
SoapUI despite the name is not a slipery tool that one always has problems grasping. In fact, it's the opposite!!
So, SoapUI, after examining several different tools was the best candidate with all the modules and feature we needed to complete our testing. We did take a few steps further, due to the amount of tests that needed to run concurrently most of the time. But at the end, we managed to get maximum coverage of testing with a high degree of accuracy as we put in place redundant validation points.
- Ability to combine multiple test and adhere to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully, regardless of pass or fail, the result is accurate.
- Excellent GUI design to make it as organic for the tester as they are revising or updating their tests. Once you get comfortable with the core functionality of SoapUI, you can explore the many added capabilities it has, like utilizing groovy or JavaScript. You can provide input and output files for the tests to use in sequence or randomly.
- Excellent reporting mechanism and options to print or to save to file. Also you can include verbose debugging content or create a shorter executive summary version. We even went as far as importing it to SQL database for cataloging and archiving for the sake of better tractability.
- Memory consumption, in large concurrent testing has been a challenge for SoapUI, mostly due to the amount of information that is getting written to the database, but there are workarounds to custom install SoapUI which for example runs on a Cloud server, where it can provide SoapUI the elasticity that it may need with large concurrent tests that run for while before completing.
- compatibility with all other databases and Open Cloud environment such as OpenStack out there in Open source, which I think is already in works.
- Integration of LoadUI is good, but to take serious step to compete with other performance and load testing tools