Highly precise alert monitoring with detailed logging.
Overall Satisfaction with Splunk Enterprise Security (ES)
We have been using Splunk ES for log analysis and monitoring effectively for the last couple of years. Updated threats could be easily identified and we could take the necessary remedial measures. The machine learning toolkit has a lot of functionality. We could easily manage the overload of traditional logging in firewalls and monitor threats more effectively with Splunk.
Pros
- In depth log analysis.
- Customisable and user-friendly threat dashboard.
- Detailed research module integration.
Cons
- Dashboard lacks live monitoring features.
- Not suitable for Amateurs in networking.
- Enterprise features are less budget friendly.
- Considerable reduction in the load of Enterprise firewalls.
- Reduced budget after removing hardware based log analysers.
- Enhanced security with in depth logging with Splunk.
We have been using risk-based alerting, and unsupervised machine learning features of Splunk effectively with advanced FortiGate firewalling. We could meet our security goals with the proper integration of a hardware-based firewall and Splunk ES. Machine learning features helped us to auto-detect a variety of threats and to research more in security logging.
FortiAnalzer is a hardware solution, but with Splunk, we could identify as well get the correct solution for the active threats and too with accurate and precise detailing.
Do you think Splunk Enterprise Security delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Splunk Enterprise Security's feature set?
Yes
Did Splunk Enterprise Security live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Splunk Enterprise Security go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Splunk Enterprise Security again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation