Likelihood to Recommend In well-suited scenarios, I would recommend using Apache Flink when you need to perform real-time analytics on streaming data, such as monitoring user activities, analyzing IoT device data, or processing financial transactions in real-time. It is also a good choice in scenarios where fault tolerance and consistency are crucial. I would not recommend it for simple batch processing pipelines or for teams that aren't experienced, as it might be overkill, and the steep learning curve may not justify the investment.
Read full review Like the name says, it is good for streaming data and analyzing. It is great to look at tuples at a fast rate, filtering, calling other sources to enrich data, can call APIs, etc. Could do better for ingest use cases, can do better with guaranteed delivery, etc.
Read full review Pros Low latency Stream Processing, enabling real-time analytics Scalability, due its great parallel capabilities Stateful Processing, providing several built-in fault tolerance systems Flexibility, supporting both batch and stream processing Read full review IBM Streams is well suited for providing wire-speed real-time end-to-end processing with sub-millisecond latency. Streams is amazingly computationally efficient. In other words, you can typically do much more processing with a given amount of hardware than other technologies. In a recent linear-road benchmark Streams based application was able to provide greater capability than the Hadoop-based implementation using 10x less hardware. So even when latency isn't critical, using Streams might still make sense for reducing operational cost. Streams comes out of the box with a large and comprehensive set of tested and optimized toolkits. Leveraging these toolkits not only reduces the development time and cost but also helps reduce project risk by eliminating the need for custom code which likely has not seen as much time in test or production. In addition to the out of the box toolkits, there is an active developer community contributing additional specialized packages. Read full review Cons Python/SQL API, since both are relatively new, still misses a few features in comparison with the Java/Scala option Steep Learning Curve, it's documentation could be improved to something more user-friendly, and it could also discuss more theoretical concepts than just coding Community smaller than other frameworks Read full review Documentation could be more extensive, with more examples, although overall this is not too bad compared to some of the alternative solutions. Seems expensive to use in production. Read full review Alternatives Considered Apache Spark is more user-friendly and features higher-level APIs. However, it was initially built for batch processing and only more recently gained streaming capabilities. In contrast, Apache Flink processes streaming data natively. Therefore, in terms of low latency and fault tolerance, Apache Flink takes the lead. However, Spark has a larger community and a decidedly lower learning curve.
Read full review There are well explained tutorials to get the user started. If you are looking for business application ideas, the user community offers a diversity of applications. It is very easy to launch applications on the cloud and can integrate with other analytic tools available on Watson Studio. It takes away the burden of the technology so that users can focus on business innovations.
Read full review Return on Investment Allowed for real-time data recovery, adding significant value to the busines Enabled us to create new internal tools that we couldn't find in the market, becoming a strategic asset for the business Enhanced the overall technical capability of the team Read full review Ability to do more with less Admins and data analyst can now focus on more thinking tasks No negative impacts yet Read full review ScreenShots