Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM) vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM)
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
APM is a SaaS solution to monitor performance, stability & security of networks, servers, platforms and cloud resources. It provides a single pane of glass to prevent and detect issues in IT environments. It is developed by the Dutch MSP Acknowledge.
$5
per month object
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
SignalFX is Real-Time Cloud Monitoring and Observability for Infrastructure, Microservices and Applications. SignalFX was acquired by Splunk in August 2019. SignalFX Infrastructure Monitoring provides real-time cloud monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure, microservices and DevOps. A new SignalFX product, SignalFx Microservices APM, was released March 2020 to detect issues, provide real-time app troubleshooting, and future-proof expectations.
$15
per month
Pricing
Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM)Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Editions & Modules
Standard (100+ objects)
$5
per month object
Small
$8
per month object
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM)Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM)Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Ask people about this product

See helpful people who have experience with this product

Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM)Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Small Businesses
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.5 out of 10
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM)Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(24 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM)Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Likelihood to Recommend
Acknowledge Benelux B.V.
No answers on this topic
Splunk
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is well suited for any complicated environment where you have apps and servers across multiple clouds and platforms and products. If you have a data centre where all your apps and servers are in one single network, you could probably get away with older solutions. But for any modern, complex, hybrid-cloud microservices environment, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is a must-have.
Read full review
Pros
Acknowledge Benelux B.V.
No answers on this topic
Splunk
  • SignalFX handles historical metric aggregation exceptionally well, providing a multifaceted approach to event detection based on anomalies.
  • SignalFX's cost is incredibly flexible with their pricing model of DPM (data-point per minute) vs the traditional "per host" model that most monitoring SaaS use.
  • SignalFX support is responsive and knowledgeable, very eager to help solve your immediate problems.
  • SignalFX integrations is vast and constantly growing, making adoption easy even when multiple different open-source technologies are used in your stack.
Read full review
Cons
Acknowledge Benelux B.V.
No answers on this topic
Splunk
  • Better integration with our clients (native mobile clients SDKs will be great).
  • A way to easily tag filters and move them across metrics/formula.
  • Alert system to easy false [alarm] and hard to configure.
  • Be able to have group more dimensions (and have more values on each).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Acknowledge Benelux B.V.
No answers on this topic
Splunk
Good: Stable system with low error rate Easy to use for simple use cases Bad: UI is not very clear for complex usage Mobile view (when logged in from phone) is bad No library for .net
Read full review
Usability
Acknowledge Benelux B.V.
No answers on this topic
Splunk
I find that learning the interface can take some time. We need a better show-and-tell on how the Teams pages, Dashboard Groups, Dashboards and charts delay. Advance SignalFlow is sometimes hard to build. Some better samples of advanced SignalFlow would be helpful. For example, Splunk SPL has a vast resource of examples.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Acknowledge Benelux B.V.
No answers on this topic
Splunk
They’re not for the same purpose but we’re using NewRelic and Honeycomb for monitoring purposes. NewRelic is used for HTTP client monitoring for system related throughput, error, database and external client monitoring. Honeycomb is used to monitor actual HTTP request/response values. Splunk [Infrastructure Monitoring] is used for real-time application related throughout and error monitoring.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Acknowledge Benelux B.V.
No answers on this topic
Splunk
  • Reduced downtime.
  • Caused us to get a lot of spam when we redeployed apps and old instances stopped sending metrics. Muting alerts solves this, but people often forget to do it or do it incorrectly.
  • Helped us find historical info about instances/apps.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Acknowledge Proactive Monitoring (APM) Screenshots

Screenshot of Overview of objects (hosts) in APMScreenshot of Overview of resources of an host (things to measure)Screenshot of Graphs are used to provide meaningful insightScreenshot of Vulnerability scanning is includedScreenshot of Asset information is includedScreenshot of Listing of resources of different objects

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-time monitoring for public, private and hybrid cloud