Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Auvik
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Auvik Network Management is a vendor-agnostic cloud-based network monitoring and management solution providing automated network discovery. Auvik requires no service hardware or disruptive maintenance cycles and provides onboarding and training for new and existing users. Auvik delivers visibility and automation to reduce friction for IT teams and allow them to give end users the freedom to work wherever and however they…N/A
LogicMonitor
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
LogicMonitor’s SaaS-based platform, LM Envision, enables observability across on-prem and multi-cloud environments. It provides IT and business teams operational visibility and predictability across their technologies and applications.N/A
PRTG
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
PRTG Network Monitor is the flagship offering from German software company Paessler, for monitoring local and wide area networks (LANs & WANs), servers, websites, apps, and more.
$2,149
per year
Pricing
AuvikLogicMonitorPRTG Network Monitor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Website Monitoring
Contact sales team
PRTG 500
$2,149
per year
Hosted 500
$2,149
per year
PRTG 1,000
$3,899
per year
Hosted 1000
$3,899
per year
PRTG 2,500
$8,099
per year
Hosted 2500
$8,099
per year
PRTG 5,000
$14,199
per year
Hosted 5000
$14,199
per year
PRTG 10000
$17,899
per year
PRTG Enterprise
Custom Pricing
subscription license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AuvikLogicMonitorPRTG
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing is calculated per number of switches, routers, firewalls, and controllers. Everything else is monitored for free.Our platform is broken down into Pro and Enterprise Pricing. Pro includes monitoring for all of your cloud, hybrid, and on-premises infrastructure. Our Enterprise package includes all of this, plus our AIOps and Machine Learning functionality that provides dynamic thresholds, root cause analysis, anomaly detection and more! LogicMonitor only charges by the device. What is considered a device? A device is anything with an IP address that you want to monitor, including a physical device or a cloud resource. This means multiple data sources under the same IP address can be monitored for the same price. Unlike some monitoring platforms. we don’t charge per node, interface, or metric.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AuvikLogicMonitorPRTG Network Monitor
Considered Multiple Products
Auvik
Chose Auvik
Auvik does build network diagrams much better than PRTG, but I do think certain thresholds for monitoring are easier to configure with PRTG. PRTG does not capture configuration snapshots/history and that is one of its major setbacks against Auvik, in addition to the remote …
Chose Auvik
Auvik was was simpler to configure and utilize. Less noise, less configuration, and more user-friendly. We moved from LogicMonitor due to be being overkill for us and too much time commitment to get things online and functional. Auvik network scanning and automatic discovery …
Chose Auvik
Auvik blows most of these out of the water. We have tried Nagios, Solarwinds and PRTG. We are happy with our choice of Auvik over those.
Chose Auvik
Auvik can stand up against any of the big network management and monitoring solutions on the market. I've implemented and used SolarWinds at many organizations for over 15 years. The paradigm that SolarWinds, PRTG, Prime, etc., work under is completely different than Auvik. …
Chose Auvik
Auvik was a much better to scale as an MSP and their support offering was far better from my research. Knowledge base, training, and dedicated support/account reps made it an easy decision. As an MSP we need less time maintaining and learning the tools and more time working …
Chose Auvik
Auvik's license structure is simple and affordable. Auvik's license is based on total network devices in your network. They charge only for total number of Switches, Routers, firewalls and Wireless controllers in your network. All other devices license would be free of charge
Chose Auvik
Auvik was the best overall feature set, pricing model, ease of setup, and great technical support.
Chose Auvik
Auvik is a superior tool for MSPs due to its multi-tenant capability, speed of deployment for new customers, and integrations with the current common MSP tools stack. Intermapper is a very powerful and expensive application, so not directly applicable, but Auvik still has many …
Chose Auvik
Auvik was better in two key respects: MSP-friendly pricing and also in the ability for less experienced technicians to set it up and use it.
Chose Auvik
The out of the box features and alerting with Auvik have been incredibly helpful. The navigation is slightly behind the clarity within the SolarWinds portals, but the alerting is significantly better out of the box.
Chose Auvik
Auvik seems to do more things automatically much better and easier than all other options. the pricing is a little steep but considering that Auvik also automatically backs up configurations of network devices that made the decision easy and we went with Auvik.
Chose Auvik
With very little setup time and no ongoing maintenance on my end, Auvik has been the only choice for me. I have not had to give up any features that I needed using them over the other guys
Chose Auvik
Auvik far surpasses competition on price, licensing, reporting, and the overall interface. While Auvik can be loop-heavy (circling back to where you started), its interface is SIMPLE and its results detailed. Whoever created the user interface needs to have a beer, because …
Chose Auvik
Auvik has a been recommended by other companies we have relation with and we started using it as the test. However we are using it more than we ever thought!
Chose Auvik
The Auvik ease of use it better than some of the alternatives
Chose Auvik
Auvik doesn't compare to anything else with its ability to map out a visual map-out network.
Chose Auvik
Much easier to install and use, great prebuilt monitoring configurations, cheaper than other paid platforms
Chose Auvik
Auvik is straightforward and easy to configure. Using Auvik is easier to use, easier to look at, and easier to train others on. Although Auvik is slightly more expensive than a few others, the cost is negligible when considering usage and capabilities. With Auvik being an …
LogicMonitor
Chose LogicMonitor
PRTG is an OK platform to use for monitoring, however LogicMonitor is a far better platform to cover all aspects.

PRTG creates a lot of noise when it is not always necessary, as well as does not always update when you want it to right away when it polls to check if the check is …
Chose LogicMonitor
We currently use both Passler PRTG and Logic Monitor, we were looking for something to replace PRTG with and thought that we found the correct tool in Auvik. We quickly realized that Auvik was very easy to stand up, but once up it would take an army of engineers to configure …
Chose LogicMonitor
We replaced Auvik with LogicMonitor. Their product dev went stale and did not fulfill some of our requests when we signed up with them some years ago.
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor really was beneficial due to its ease of use. PRTG is an excellent monitoring solution, but it does not integrate with Active Directory as well. WhatsUp Gold is also fairly easy to implement but was still internally hosted. Zabbix was still internally hosted at the …
Chose LogicMonitor
We used LogicMonitor and ended up switching to Auvik for a variety of price, performance, and integration reasons. LogicMonitor did not suit us as an MSP.
Chose LogicMonitor
  • Auvik and LogicMonitor are very different, but certainly competitors. Both solutions provide alerting. Auvik focuses on network equipment (firewalls, switches, etc), whereas LogicMonitor is more a jack of all trades alerting platform including servers, VMware, and websites.
  • For…
Chose LogicMonitor
Auvik was much more simple to use, and the graphical representation of the network topology was very useful for networking. LogicMonitor definitely has the upper hand in the amount of information you can manage, however.
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor has a ton more ways to customize and monitor specific processes or items that other products simply cannot do. We started monitoring applications and actually logging into them to verify everything from start to finish is fully monitored and is working properly. I …
Chose LogicMonitor
Auvik did not provide historical data and could not monitor as many device types as LM. We found the Auvik collector to be more "buggy" and have had less issues with LM. We do feel that Auvik had a better network topology map and would clearly show device relationship. That is …
Chose LogicMonitor
SolarWinds had the big breach just as we left it. We loved how powerful it was, and how customizable - however, it is an ON-Prem tool, and as a growing MSP, that dynamic didn't and couldn't scale. We then moved to Auvik, which had the cleanest GUI and some neat features. That …
Chose LogicMonitor
When looking for a monitoring tool, LogicMonitor was similar or better than all of them. We moved away from SolarWinds because of its inability to monitor other network environments and lack of a collector or probe type device that could collect remote data. PRTG was very …
Chose LogicMonitor
Our business used the trial period they provided on one of our systems and conducted sessions with all of this software. Our team tested all of these software options before deciding on LogicMonitor, as our business is expanding daily and we needed a system that could …
Chose LogicMonitor
SaaS monitoring makes so much sense. Why run your monitoring inside the same environment you're trying to monitor, and how do you monitor your on prem monitoring if there's an outage affecting your own infrastructure? Whilst LogicMonitor isn't a specific point solution so …
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor was the most versatile and easy to deploy solution. The data from LogicMonitor could be integrated with our other platforms, so it became the source of truth.
Chose LogicMonitor
Our initial business requirements in 2016 were to monitor Vblock and FlexPod deployments. We had specific gaps with particular storage appliances the monitoring tool we used at that time could not monitor effectively. When evaluating the mentioned solutions, LogicMonitor was …
Chose LogicMonitor
Domotz didnt cover all devices, for example MacOS devices. Which we dont have a lot of but are still critical to monitor on our network. Solarwinds Network Device monitoring was free and great, however the display was a bit much. Also had a lot of stuff we didnt really need to …
Chose LogicMonitor
Logic Monitor is not a near to the Solarwinds,
Chose LogicMonitor
Again, I really want to say how much I like the customization options with LogicMonitor when compared to previous solutions I've worked with. Also want to call out the fact that the deployment and configuration in new managed environments take less of our team's time to …
Chose LogicMonitor
This is not an exhaustive list of all products we have previously evaluated. All of these likely have specific use-cases where they would be appropriate choices. In our evaluations, we've felt that LogicMonitor best fit the requirements of our use-case/s than the competition.
Chose LogicMonitor
We reviewed a couple of products before making the decision to go with LogicMonitor. ManageEngine had a solid product but lacked the cloud feature. Overall the cost was less, but it would be expensive to maintain server hardware. Support was lacking as you do not get great …
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor beats all other products that we have tried. The dashboards, reports, and the amount of points that can be monitored is massively out of the way of the competition.
Chose LogicMonitor
Spectrum was used as a standalone system. The server is located inhouse and stored and pollers set to all clients network in order to monitor, this proved to be costly and time consuming. LogicMonitor utilizing the cloud based services provides less hardware to use and less …
Chose LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor is much easier to configure and use than the other solutions we looked at. Very easy to customize and fit our environment. The others felt more rigid. LogicMonitor also fully integrates into our ticketing system so that was a very big plus. It has the ability to …
Chose LogicMonitor
The LM interface is much easier to use than the other products I demoed. The dashboards are more elegant, especially when being displayed in hallways where executives may walk by. The startup time was minimal to get fully implemented. Azure AD integration made SSO very simple …
PRTG
Chose PRTG Network Monitor
PRTG offers more versatility in monitoring when compared to the other solutions we tested. The other solutions were also limited as far as customization options, which made them less adaptable to our networks.

When compared to Auvik, for instance, we prefer PRTG as it offers …
Chose PRTG Network Monitor
The native iOS apps and desktop apps for alerts and easy visibility set PRTG Network Monitor apart from others. Websites are available with the others and Checkmk has connections to telegram or splunk to get push notifications, but not as easy to see the whole organization at …
Chose PRTG Network Monitor
PRTG is a light weight Network Fault and performance monitoring tool with low cost and lower server specification. Although it is light weight still it covers all required network fault and performance monitoring parameters out of the box and also allows you to customize …
Features
AuvikLogicMonitorPRTG Network Monitor
Network Performance Monitoring
Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Auvik
7.9
106 Ratings
1% below category average
LogicMonitor
-
Ratings
PRTG Network Monitor
7.4
67 Ratings
8% below category average
Automated network device discovery9.6105 Ratings00 Ratings7.560 Ratings
Network monitoring8.8106 Ratings00 Ratings9.566 Ratings
Baseline threshold calculation7.883 Ratings00 Ratings8.157 Ratings
Alerts8.6105 Ratings00 Ratings8.767 Ratings
Network capacity planning7.683 Ratings00 Ratings6.348 Ratings
Packet capture analysis7.065 Ratings00 Ratings6.634 Ratings
Network mapping8.4104 Ratings00 Ratings5.947 Ratings
Customizable reports5.678 Ratings00 Ratings6.157 Ratings
Wireless infrastructure monitoring7.485 Ratings00 Ratings6.649 Ratings
Hardware health monitoring8.296 Ratings00 Ratings9.164 Ratings
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Comparison of IT Infrastructure Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Auvik
-
Ratings
LogicMonitor
8.8
1 Ratings
1% above category average
PRTG Network Monitor
-
Ratings
Network visibility00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-system monitoring00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance analysis and forecasting00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboards and visualization00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AuvikLogicMonitorPRTG Network Monitor
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.4 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.4 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 8.5 out of 10
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.4 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.8 out of 10
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AuvikLogicMonitorPRTG Network Monitor
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(118 ratings)
9.4
(179 ratings)
8.5
(67 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(2 ratings)
6.7
(8 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
8.3
(29 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(4 ratings)
9.3
(109 ratings)
8.0
(18 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(24 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AuvikLogicMonitorPRTG Network Monitor
Likelihood to Recommend
Auvik Networks Inc.
Auvik is well suited for managed service customers and small-scale SMB customers who do not have enough technical resource to manage and monitor their network. Also for customer who has distributed networks spreaded across worldwide or nation wide, Auvik is well suited since it does not need any on-premise setup at each site except for a collector. For customer who has already adopted and used cloud network and hosting services, Auvik is better as Auvik is also fully cloud based offering
Read full review
LogicMonitor
The example I will give will explain my rating for it. One employee left our company due to a personal issue, and at that time, our team was working on a highly secure project. He wanted to take revenge on our company, so he began hacking our systems from the outside. Since it appears that someone without authorization is attempting to access our systems, LogicMonitor simultaneously alerted our team to the problem. We stopped that threat with LogicMonitor.
Read full review
Paessler
integrates seamlessly with Windows servers via WMI and PowerShell, providing deep insights into resource usage, performance metrics, and system health. It's excellent at tracking CPU, memory, disk space, and event logs, enabling rapid troubleshooting and proactive maintenance. PRTG Network Monitor also effectively monitors Fortigate devices, providing detailed data on firewall health, traffic patterns, bandwidth utilization, VPN status, and security alerts. This visibility helps detect and resolve network security issues promptly.
Read full review
Pros
Auvik Networks Inc.
  • Auvik is the big pic tool of choice for network diagramming, helps layout of our network infrastructure, and we'll know immediately the status of the devices that are successfully communicating, and those that may have, for example, credentials issues.
  • Auvik's "Traffic Insights" are key accelerators for intuitively isolating and resolving traffic-related issues quickly and easily, and the historical information makes it simpler to deduce what aspects may need replacement, capacity improvement, or possibly even re-architecture.
  • Auvik integration tools are excellent solution enhancers - that are of particular interest to our company, as we make use of MS Teams and Connectwise products; we would like to see some features to integrate to ServiceNow as well.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
  • It shows us system issues right away so we can fix them fast.
  • It finds new devices on its own, so we do not miss anything.
  • It alerts us only when something really unusual happens.
  • Its dashboards make it easy for everyone to see system health.
  • It helps us see trends so we are ready for busy times.
Read full review
Paessler
  • Switch monitoring and finding out if there are communication issues or throughput alerts are reached
  • Big picture view of the whole infrastructure and what is functioning and what is not
  • Uptime tracking is great and lets us know for how long a device is down or overall uptime
Read full review
Cons
Auvik Networks Inc.
  • The map is not easy to quickly zoom in and out of or pan around. Usually requires a lot of filter toggling. Keyboard shortcuts for this would be nice.
  • Better global settings that can be pushed to multiple client organizations
  • Security groups/RBAC for user permissions across multiple clients
  • Ability to change the URL
Read full review
LogicMonitor
  • Segmentation at an instance level not just the resource when clients are sharing the same device but shouldn't see each other's relevant data
  • ARM CPU support for collectors to allow for a lighter weight appliance deployment
  • WMI collection with a Linux collector so a windows collector would not be needed or a virtual appliance template that can be used to deploy collectors
Read full review
Paessler
  • Licensing on a per entity basis can be cumbersome for devices which have a ton of monitoring points like network switches\routers. Each sensor may count against a license, which could be a lot of you were monitoring every TX\RX of an SFP for example
  • A better method to easily template\copy monitors across devices
  • The navigation in the web GUI could be a little more straightforward in terms of the hierarchy
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Auvik Networks Inc.
Because it's an amazing product.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
This product has met virtually all of our needs. It was easy to implement and has been simple to support. Customization has been intuitive with many options available. They keep adding features and expanding available options. The future of LogicMonitor looks even better than it is today which is very promising. The management and support teams at LogicMonitor are always helpful
Read full review
Paessler
I would renew it because the platform has brought us many technical and economic benefits that make the cost-benefit ratio very good. Additionally, to do so does not require large investments in training, licensing or infrastructure, and at the administration level, extensive knowledge is not required to be able to bear it.
Read full review
Usability
Auvik Networks Inc.
The program can be a bit unwieldy at times, however the majority of information is displayed in a readable and friendly way. The maps and popup information box from the bottom can be harder to use on a smaller screen but on a 1080p+ display tends to work fine.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
Set up is super easy. Just stand up a small Linux or Windows server to act as a collector. There are no agents to install on monitored devices and all you need is SNMP or WMI access. When creating dashboards, all you have to do is find the widget on the device you want to show up and choose the menu option to add it.
Read full review
Paessler
The tool is very intuitive to use and it is Windows-based (everybody knows how to use Windows) so it's easy to get into. Every time is setup in a hierarchy so if you have a good initial hierarchy design, it will really reduce administrative effort down the road.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Auvik Networks Inc.
We have never had a major outage or impact that was noticeable.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
No answers on this topic
Paessler
No answers on this topic
Performance
Auvik Networks Inc.
Pages can be slow to load on larger sites but tends to be fine for most clients.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
No answers on this topic
Paessler
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Auvik Networks Inc.
Fast response and knowledgeable. If the technician does not know, they will look for the information and get back to you.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
The sales team support we received was top notch. They worked hand in hand to make sure the product met all expectations. So far we have not really had to work with support that much; we have worked with setup team after purchase to deploy product fully. No issues so far and we are four weeks in.
Read full review
Paessler
PRTG does everything we need it to do and more. Ease of use, ease of management and maintenance and clarity of monitoring of hundreds of different types of device and service gives this a large advantage over other products on the market that I have tried. I would definitely recommend it to anyone who needs a network monitoring product in their environment and even to people who don't know they need a solution yet!
Read full review
In-Person Training
Auvik Networks Inc.
No answers on this topic
LogicMonitor
Add good training
Read full review
Paessler
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Auvik Networks Inc.
No answers on this topic
LogicMonitor
The training is good but room to improve
Read full review
Paessler
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Auvik Networks Inc.
No answers on this topic
LogicMonitor
I did not truly dedicate myself to implementing LogicMonitor. However, I overheard the IT team members explain that "LogicMonitor is perfect for us as it has made most of the work automated, and implementation and training sessions were perfect for us." Thus, I can state that everything went smoothly with our implementation.
Read full review
Paessler
It's very important that de project's teams have different member of the TI. We have learned too late the importa of Security Analyst at the design architecture moment. We have to rebuild part of the implementation for made this big mistake.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Auvik Networks Inc.
Auvik can stand up against any of the big network management and monitoring solutions on the market. I've implemented and used SolarWinds at many organizations for over 15 years. The paradigm that SolarWinds, PRTG, Prime, etc., work under is completely different than Auvik. It's apparent that Auvik was aiming to solve a different problem and built that solution from the ground up. For any organization responsible for multiple other organizations' infrastructure, Auvik is invaluable in comparison to the other products listed.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
Basically, we did not have any idea about it and how to choose, but we asked one of our former bosses, as they were very experienced with it, so they helped us by clarifying a few things between New Relic and LogicMonitor, as they told us that if you are looking for an automated option, then there is no better option than LogicMonitor.
Read full review
Paessler
PRTG offers more versatility in monitoring when compared to the other solutions we tested. The other solutions were also limited as far as customization options, which made them less adaptable to our networks. When compared to Auvik, for instance, we prefer PRTG as it offers immediate notifications through the desktop client - not limited to email notifications as with Auvik. We also appreciate the fact that PRTG can be self/on-prem hosted vs Auvik's cloud model. This makes for an easier deployment and less firewall adjustments to allow traffic to cloud-hosted solutions.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Auvik Networks Inc.
No answers on this topic
LogicMonitor
Pricing seems to be getting more and more aggressive, I worry that it's going to turn into ServiceNow or SAP and everything minor feature will be an extreme cost that prices out us and our customers
Read full review
Paessler
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Auvik Networks Inc.
Auvik has worked on sites with 15+ offices connected with VPN's and we have not encountered any issues with the monitoring. On larger sites the map can be a bit cumbersome to read however it can be cleaned up easily with device filters.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
No answers on this topic
Paessler
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Auvik Networks Inc.
No answers on this topic
LogicMonitor
Haven't really used it but our initial onboarding PS was disappointing. Felt like we were being told what we needed to cover as opposed to what we wanted to cover. In addition, we were pushed into using the PS in tight time frames and we were not ready to do so.
Read full review
Paessler
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Auvik Networks Inc.
  • the ROI for Auvik comes from the time it saves in updating documentation and onboarding, new clients. We no longer have to spend a day investigating a network and documenting it, this is life and up to date so you always have true information for reporting and troubleshooting.
Read full review
LogicMonitor
  • We Eliminated an on-prem monitoring tool which was in excess of 25 servers
  • A decrease in time to response from our Network Operations Center resulted in a more consistent client experience
  • Dynamic alert thresholds helped reduce alerting by about 10 to 15% as soon as we turned it on for volatile metrics like CPU and memory
Read full review
Paessler
  • The ability to analyze multiple pieces of information in one place, especially with historical data, has saved our IT department time and headaches. It would be so much more difficult to trace an issue without PRTG, just relying on event logs and an open task manager window.
  • The cost is not cheap, so it's an expense that hits the bottom line like everything else. Figure in hardware costs as well, ideally a server outside of your main environment.
  • I keep saying this, but the historical data piece is worth so much. There's really no good way to collect all of that information in one place without something like PRTG. And that definitely saves time and money in the long run.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Auvik Screenshots

Screenshot of a display of the big network picture used to narrow down possible devices to investigate. Auvik pulls data from sources like CDP, LLDP, and forwarding tables to meticulously model the Layer 1 network diagram. Layers 2 and 3 are built from ARP tables, IP assignments, and VLAN associations to show what’s on the network, where it is, and how it’s connected.Screenshot of Auvik’s automated inventory, which uses network protocols to detect and capture full details for every device on the network including make and model, serial number, IP address, and the physical switchport the device is connected to. If the device is known but not its location, Auvik can find the device and every other device it’s connected to.Screenshot of lifecycle data, pulled from supported devices to show whether they’re on current or expired support contracts, whether there are more up-to-date software versions available, if devices are eligible to receive critical security updates, and if devices are still available for purchase.Screenshot of Auvik's over 50 pre-configured alerts tuned to industry best practices and ranging from informational to emergency. Its pre-configured alerts can be tweaked, added to, and the frequency of how often notifications are sent can be changed.Screenshot of Auvik TrafficInsights, which leverages machine learning and traffic classification to show which applications—like Dropbox, Netflix, or Slack—or protocols are using up the bulk of the network’s bandwidth.Screenshot of Auvik's centralized syslog for all network devices where they can be viewed directly from the device dashboard for more context, to more quickly troubleshoot network issues.

LogicMonitor Screenshots

Screenshot of AIOps features for enterprises using technology or hybrid environments with cloud and container resources. LogicMonitor can be used to monitor and improve the performance of complex enterprise networks with dynamic thresholds, topology mapping, anomaly detection, and root cause analysis.Screenshot of LM Envision's comprehensive monitoring and observability capabilities across the IT infrastructure, that help to identify alerts for the most important systems while ensuring the user experience is uninterrupted across the globe.Screenshot of Monitoring that ensures servers and the applications running on top of them are highly available. Helps resolve issues and optimize resource consumption for the server infrastructure.Screenshot of LogicMonitor remote workforce monitoring, which ensures that employees are connected to the systems that keep them productive and provide proactive insight into dispersed systems and third-party outages.Screenshot of Unified cloud monitoring across a hybrid multi-cloud ecosystem.Screenshot of LM Logs delivering log analysis at enterprise scale.