Using LogicMonitor as a Non-MSP
Overall Satisfaction with LogicMonitor
We use LogicMonitor to monitor uptime for each of our 50+ sites across the globe. It's primarily used by each division's IT staff to keep up with bandwidth usage, netflow statistics, and server alerts. We've recently started to integrate the LM Logs and Configuration monitoring into our system. This has drastically helped in reducing troubleshooting time for issues.
Pros
- Alerts and Escalation Chains
- Netflow Metrics
- Configuration Change Comparison
Cons
- Could use more reporting options
- Waiting on the addition of BGP neighbors in mapping
- New UI rollout is taking a while
- Increased response time to issues
- More visibility into our systems
- Dashboards provide a level of transparency to other departments
- SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (npm)
LogicMonitor's licensing is per device instead of SolarWinds per interface. This means a switch only needs one license compared to SolarWinds licensing per port on the switch. SolarWind's GUI is old and not very intuitive to new users. Setting up users in LogicMonitor is super easy and the use of roles makes managing permissions simple.
We've been able to retire several systems and consolidate them into LogicMonitor. It has replaced SolarWinds for monitoring. For network mapping, it has replaced Netbrain. For Netflow, we moved from LiveAction to LogicMonitor. LogicMonitor has also increased visibility into our network and servers. The escalation chains and alerts go out to each device's respective divisions and if they don't respond, the alert escalates to provide more visibility.
Do you think LogicMonitor delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with LogicMonitor's feature set?
Yes
Did LogicMonitor live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of LogicMonitor go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy LogicMonitor again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation