Azure Data Catalog vs. Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Data Catalog
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Data Catalog is an enterprise-wide metadata catalog designed to make data asset discovery straightforward, a fully-managed service that lets analysts. data scientists, and developers to register, enrich, discover, understand, and consume data sources.N/A
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
The vendor states that Informatica Data Quality empowers companies to take a holistic approach to managing data quality across the entire organization, and that with Informatica Data Quality, users are able to ensure the success of data-driven digital transformation initiatives and projects across users, types, and scale, while also automating mission-critical tasks.N/A
Pricing
Azure Data CatalogInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Data CatalogInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Data CatalogInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Features
Azure Data CatalogInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Data Quality
Comparison of Data Quality features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Catalog
-
Ratings
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
8.2
4 Ratings
3% below category average
Data source connectivity00 Ratings8.94 Ratings
Data profiling00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
Master data management (MDM) integration00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Data element standardization00 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Match and merge00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Address verification00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Data CatalogInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

HubSpot Data Hub
HubSpot Data Hub
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Data CatalogInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(9 ratings)
9.0
(19 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(14 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Data CatalogInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Data Catalog helps us solve data discovery problems
brilliantly. Our organization created a single source of truth for our data,
which allowed us to develop BI and data science solutions. We can drag tables
or data sources to manage workflow. Some of the more complicated data normalization
or standardization issues need to be simplified, and I'd like to see that
happen.
Read full review
Informatica
For effective data collaboration, systematic verification of customer information, and address, among others, Informatica Data Quality is a fruitful application to consider. Besides, Informatica Data Quality controls quality through a cleansing process, giving the company a professional outline of candid data profiling and reputable analytics. Finally, Informatica Data Quality allows the simplistic navigation of content, with a dashboard that supports predictability.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • It's easy to use and implement.
  • Ownership of the data.
  • It's helpful for all businesses.
  • Policy on data preservation.
  • It can utilize various data sources.
  • Data management is secure and simple.
Read full review
Informatica
  • The matching algorithms in IDQ are very powerful if you understand the different types that they offer (e.g., Hamming Distance, Jaro, Bigram, etc..). We had to play around with it to see which best suit our own needs of identifying and eliminating duplicate customers. Setting up the whole process (e.g., creating the KeyGenerator Transformation, setting up the matching threshold, etc..) can be somewhat time consuming and a challenge if you don't first standardize your data.
  • The integration with PowerCenter is great if you have both. You can either import your mappings directly to PowerCenter or to an XML file. The only downside is that some of the transformations are unique to IDQ, so you are not really able to edit them once in PowerCenter.
  • The standardizer transformation was key in helping us standardize our customer data (e.g., names, addresses, etc..). It was helpful due to having create a reference table containing the standardized value and the associated unstandardized values. What was great was that if you used Informatica Analyst, a business analyst could login and correct any of the values.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Maintenance and creation of documentation for data sources takes a lot of time
  • One cannot connect to data using a client's app unless they know the locus of the data source.
Read full review
Informatica
  • Several partnerships diminishing the value of technologies
  • Unable to get list of objects from Repository (like sources & targets) that don't have any dependency
  • Scheduling: The built-in scheduling tool has many constraints such as handling Unix/VB scripts etc. Most enterprises use third party tools for this.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Informatica
As pointed out earlier, due all the robust features IDQ has, our use f the product is successful and stable. IDQ is being used in multiple sources (from CRM application and in batch mode). As this is an iterative process, we are looking to improve our system efficiency using IDQ.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Informatica
Easy to use not only for developers but also business users
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Informatica
The application works well except an occasional error out while using the system. It usually gets fixed when restarting the Infa server
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Informatica
Performance works just fine. It was able to load 200+ business terms, 150+ DQ automation, etc. very well.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Azure Data Catalogue was chosen for
  • Microsoft's customer service and expertise
  • Experience with Azure Cloud Solutions
  • Reviews from peers on functionality and performance
  • Product roadmap
  • Overall costs
Read full review
Informatica
IDQ is used by a department at my organisation to ensure and enhance the data quality.
The usage was started with address standardization and now it had been brought to altogether a next level of quality check where it fixes duplicates, junk characters, standardize the names, streets, product descriptions.
In the past we had issues mainly with duplicate customers and products and this were affecting the sales projection and estimates.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Informatica
Scalability works as expected and it is truly an enterprise system.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Azure platform makes it easier for us to register & catalogue all available information easily. This way when the customer actually made a sudden request or they want to access sensitive information on their own, the data is readily presented to them. Needless to say we use this mined and catalogue data for a variety of inhouse training and other improvement initiatives.
Read full review
Informatica
  • Integration with tools like PowerCenter helped faster delivery of product, and at the same time conversion
  • Reduce overall project cost due to bad data , bad quality, exceptions identified nearing go-live and post production
  • Employee efficiency is increased exponentially due to more automated, customized tool
Read full review
ScreenShots