Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. IBM Cloud Container Registry

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

61 Reviews and Ratings

IBM Cloud Container Registry

IBM Cloud Container Registry

11 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)	Score 8.3 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft's Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed to make deploying and managing containerized applications easy. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. It allows development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.	N/A
IBM Cloud Container Registry	Score 8.7 out of 10	N/A	IBM Cloud Container Registry enables users to store and distribute container images, and run them in the IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service and other runtime environments.	N/A

Pricing

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

IBM Cloud Container Registry

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)	IBM Cloud Container Registry
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)	IBM Cloud Container Registry
Considered Both Products	Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) No answer on this topic	IBM Cloud Container Registry Verified User Consultant Chose IBM Cloud Container Registry When I need to work with private containers in a proof of concept I use IBM Cloud Container Registry. Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Good pricing Pro Continuous integration Pro Works fine	Pro Easily integrate Pro Easy integration Pro Ibm cloud
Top Cons	Minus Learning curve Minus Little challenging Minus Steep learning curve	No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)	IBM Cloud Container Registry
Small Businesses	Portainer Score 9.3 out of 10	Portainer Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Docker Score 9.2 out of 10	Docker Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises	Docker Score 9.2 out of 10	Docker Score 9.2 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)	IBM Cloud Container Registry
Likelihood to Recommend	8.5 (5 ratings)	10.0 (2 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)	IBM Cloud Container Registry
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft At one instance, there was a fire in our data center and the backup power had some issues because of which the whole DC went down. I believe with AKS and the replication it's easier to handle such a situation. Also, the scenario would have been pretty transparent to the end-users. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM When I need to do a proof of concept of a solution for a client and it must have high levels of privacy and at the same time performance, I use IBM Cloud Container Registry. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Microsoft Highly repeatable process Minimizes the amount of software to install Easily scale resources to meet demand Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM Scalable Plans Easily integrate it with IBM Kube service Easy integration with IBM Cloud CI/CD tools. Incentivized Lokesh Venkatesan Senior Subject Matter Expert Read full review
Cons	Microsoft Need to update cluster manually Policies cannot be updated for existing components if any change in policy every has to create cluster Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM Kubernetes CI/CD Docker Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Microsoft Microsoft support was really good, whenever we raise any ticket they come back to us within a couple of hours. Incentivized Mounika Chirasani Software Engineer Read full review	IBM No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft The ability to create new instances (i.e. elastic provisioning) is probably the fastest with Azure Kubernetes Service compared to the alternatives that I have looked at. From a pricing perspective, Microsoft always seems to find a way to be more competitive in this area, and literally every other field they play in. Incentivized Scott Kennedy Director, eCommerce Analytics and Digital Marketing Read full review	IBM Not Applicable in our case. We started using IBM container registry as IBM bluemix is our preferred cloud platform Incentivized Lokesh Venkatesan Senior Subject Matter Expert Read full review
Return on Investment	Microsoft Positive impact in moving applications to cloud from the in-hose data center to save cost Sometimes got affected with some bugs on the AKS infrastructure but hasn't caused a big kios as our production footprint in AKS is not yet high Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM reliability easy integration multicloud Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots