Azure Pipelines vs. Azure Test Plans

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Pipelines
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Users can automate builds and deployments with Azure Pipelines. Build, test, and deploy Node.js, Python, Java, PHP, Ruby, C/C++, .NET, Android, and iOS apps. Run in parallel on Linux, macOS, and Windows. Azure Pipelines can be purchased standalone, but it is also part of Azure DevOps Services agile development planning and CI/CD suite.N/A
Azure Test Plans
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Azure Test Plans is an exploratory test toolkit available from Microsoft's Azure suite of services. It enables manual testing for users, so that they can plan, execute, and track scripted tests with actionable defects and end-to-end traceability. Assess quality throughout the development lifecycle by testing your desktop or web applications. It is available with Azure DevOps Services.N/A
Pricing
Azure PipelinesAzure Test Plans
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure PipelinesAzure Test Plans
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure PipelinesAzure Test Plans
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Azure PipelinesAzure Test Plans
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Pipelines
-
Ratings
Azure Test Plans
8.4
6 Ratings
4% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings8.26 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings8.56 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.36 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings7.36 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure PipelinesAzure Test Plans
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure PipelinesAzure Test Plans
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(3 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure PipelinesAzure Test Plans
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It is good tool if you are doing continuous improvements in your code and you wish it goes live whenever you push code to GitHub. So integrating Azure Pipeline, it automatically does CI/CD in the background once you push code/merge code and it is live in few minutes. It also does some automated tests if you have wrote scripts
Read full review
Microsoft
It works well for express test case implementation with a short duration. You can define the tests for two weeks and run the activities documenting the software errors and fixes to control the effectiveness of DevOps. The graphic reports give the idea of the backlog phases advances and errors detected. It needs improvement if you have a large test project and need to design financial budgets and control over costs of the test plan.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Integration with SonarQube
  • Integration with Azure DevOps
  • Integration with GitHub
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Multi test plan access
  • Well structured and easy to use
  • Integrates with other azure features to work seamlessly ,connecting the data flow
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • The errors which we got sometimes are not clearly enough.
  • There are some let's say hidden options, they could be more visible
  • When the process is running we have to remember about manually refreshing to see the current status because it doesn't work automatically
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Graphic definition of the the Work Break Down Structure
  • Gantt Chart to check the activity dependance and flow of the process
  • Basic cost module to design test budgets.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We have used the GitHub CI/CD. Earlier we were using the Azure Pipelines but after GitHub had their actions, we integrated that for CI/CD. It runs the tests and makes a production build which can be live. GitHub CI/CD is more useful because we have to make script only once then just by few changes we can deploy it onto Azure, AWS, Google anywhere so we found it more convenient
Read full review
Microsoft
We're doing a full continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), continuous testing (CT), security, delivery, and monitoring. They have been lately adding features to the services on a regular basis. Every two weeks, they add functionality to Azure DevOps Services to match it with what Azure DevOps Server or on-prem would offer. So, we continue to get more robust functionality. My favorite right now is that they are starting to open up the API availability within Azure DevOps Services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • we have had outages from Azure in the past
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Pros: One stop solution for end to end traceability
  • Pros: Exploratory testing used
  • Pros: maximum coverage on multiple browsers, operating system combinations
  • Cons: Integration with Non-Microsoft tools can be improved
Read full review
ScreenShots