What users are saying about
7 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 8.9 out of 100
Based on 7 reviews and ratings
38 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 5.7 out of 100
Based on 38 reviews and ratings
Feature Set Ratings
Project Management

8.3
Celoxis
83%

Digital.ai Agility
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
Celoxis ranks higher in 14/14 features
Celoxis ranks higher in 14/14 features
Task Management

9.3
93%
4 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Resource Management

7.7
77%
4 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Gantt Charts

7.7
77%
4 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Scheduling

8.5
85%
3 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Workflow Automation

7.5
75%
3 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Team Collaboration

7.3
73%
4 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology

9.0
90%
1 Rating

N/A
0 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology

10.0
100%
1 Rating

N/A
0 Ratings
Document Management

8.0
80%
2 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Email integration

9.0
90%
2 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Mobile Access

6.0
60%
1 Rating

N/A
0 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking

8.5
85%
3 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Change request and Case Management

9.0
90%
2 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management

8.0
80%
3 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Professional Services Automation

8.3
Celoxis
83%

Digital.ai Agility
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
Celoxis ranks higher in 4/4 features
Celoxis ranks higher in 4/4 features
Quotes/estimates

8.5
85%
3 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Invoicing

7.0
70%
2 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Project & financial reporting

7.5
75%
3 Ratings

N/A
0 Ratings
Integration with accounting software

10.0
100%
1 Rating

N/A
0 Ratings
Attribute Ratings
- Celoxis is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend
Likelihood to Recommend

8.7
Celoxis
87%
4 Ratings

8.4
Digital.ai Agility
84%
9 Ratings
Support Rating

Celoxis
N/A
0 Ratings

9.2
Digital.ai Agility
92%
4 Ratings
Likelihood to Recommend
Celoxis
Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work.It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.

Verified User
Director in Other
Information Technology & Services Company, 51-200 employeesDigital.ai Agility
Scenarios where it works well:1) Retros can be very well facilitated & notes/action items
can be captured against the sprint.2) Product Owner can effectively track the story
progress with all the test-cases, design etc.3) Being good scaling support, it provides good visibility
across multiple teams, programs and agile portfolios, providing a centralized
environment where all our stakeholders can easily work together regardless of location.4) It provides easy tracking all of your epics,
stories, themes, defects, tasks, tests and issues5) I like its intuitive UI as for moving stories
around, burning hours.6) It allows top leadership to visualize
and report their strategic plans, giving all stakeholders the relevant data
that they need to stay dedicated to the project priorities. 7) It can be easily integrated with slack
so for few teams we used slack for collaborationScenarios where it did not work well:1) Test Management need improvement in
terms of tracking tests, team had hard time tracking regression test cases.2) Version one comes with lot of features like
Rally but here we don’t get customizations which is there in Jira where from workflow
to issue everything can be customized based on your team/program/portfolio
requirements.3) Lot of navigation to access basic
stuff. Example I want to go to bug attachment , there are lt of clicks &
navigation need to do which should be pretty straightforward I feel.
can be captured against the sprint.2) Product Owner can effectively track the story
progress with all the test-cases, design etc.3) Being good scaling support, it provides good visibility
across multiple teams, programs and agile portfolios, providing a centralized
environment where all our stakeholders can easily work together regardless of location.4) It provides easy tracking all of your epics,
stories, themes, defects, tasks, tests and issues5) I like its intuitive UI as for moving stories
around, burning hours.6) It allows top leadership to visualize
and report their strategic plans, giving all stakeholders the relevant data
that they need to stay dedicated to the project priorities. 7) It can be easily integrated with slack
so for few teams we used slack for collaborationScenarios where it did not work well:1) Test Management need improvement in
terms of tracking tests, team had hard time tracking regression test cases.2) Version one comes with lot of features like
Rally but here we don’t get customizations which is there in Jira where from workflow
to issue everything can be customized based on your team/program/portfolio
requirements.3) Lot of navigation to access basic
stuff. Example I want to go to bug attachment , there are lt of clicks &
navigation need to do which should be pretty straightforward I feel.
Enterprise Agile Coach
Tata Consultancy ServicesInformation Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees
Pros
Celoxis
- Project planning
- Time log
- Efforts analysis vs plan
General Manager
Adi Mainly Software Ltd.Computer Software, 11-50 employees
Digital.ai Agility
- Automated saving of changes, no records can be lost because all items are saved in real-time.
- The watch function, optional but beneficial when managing multiple teams or projects.

Verified User
Analyst in Information Technology
Financial Services Company, 1001-5000 employeesCons
Celoxis
- Support is at times slow to respond.
- Not new user-friendly.
- Not able to pull in closer or zoom the interface.

Verified User
Consultant in Product Management
Real Estate Company, 11-50 employeesDigital.ai Agility
- Saving of changes is inconsistent. Sometimes the changes appear to save automatically and other times the user needs to click the "Apply" button. Until the user is familiar with when this needs to happen, work can easily be lost.
- This may be a setup configuration issue, but it would be good to be able to set the default team when creating stories. Too often stories are created and the user forgets to enter the team and they need to search the entire database for the story that was just created.
Adobe Experience Manager Mobile High Profile Quality Engineer
AdobeComputer Software, 10,001+ employees
Pricing Details
Celoxis
General
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
$25 per user, per month
Celoxis Editions & Modules
On-premise Edition
On-Premise | $4501 |
---|
- per user, one time
SaaS Edition
SaaS | $251 |
---|
- per user, per month
Additional Pricing Details
Duration and Volume discounts (For SaaS) Volume discounts (For On-Premise) Free Support for 1st year (For On-Premise) Low TCO with multi-OS, database support (For On-Premise) Free Client-logins and "email-only" users One hour complimentary Celoxis Administrator courseDigital.ai Agility
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
—Digital.ai Agility Editions & Modules
—
Additional Pricing Details
—Support Rating
Celoxis
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Digital.ai Agility
Digital.ai Agility 9.2
Based on 4 answers
VersionOne provides outstanding training. They have Product Owner training that I recommend every Product Owner attend. They have scrum master training and other agile training that was well worth the money paid because it made the teams more productive. And the support for the tool is incredible. These people live and breathe Agile and are evangelists and enthusiasts.
Vice President, Chief Architect, Development Manager and Software Engineer
WySTAR Global Retirement Solutions, a Wells Fargo CompanyFinancial Services, 10,001+ employees
Alternatives Considered
Celoxis
I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.

Verified User
Director in Other
Information Technology & Services Company, 51-200 employeesDigital.ai Agility
Basecamp functions much differently from Version One and serves a different purpose, so it's kind of like comparing apples and oranges. However, both V1 and Basecamp have their pros and cons. V1 makes it easier to manage Agile processes, but Basecamp is more user-friendly and can be used for broader purposes. At our organization, we utilize both products. V1 is what we use to manage processes internally, and Basecamp is what we use to manage client-facing processes. If our organization wasn't Agile, I would prefer to use Basecamp for all project management (internal and client-facing), and have done so at previous organizations for which I've worked
Project Manager
The Creative MomentumDesign, 11-50 employees
Return on Investment
Celoxis
- Positive in most cases
General Manager
Adi Mainly Software Ltd.Computer Software, 11-50 employees
Digital.ai Agility
- I came in near the end of our use of VersionOne (we are migrating to Jira), and I don't operate or think at the business return (ROI) level. I'm not the one to comment on this!
- I suspect that V1 added much clarity to the prioritization of work, and added visibility across entire teams. So I assume that it had a positive impact on returns.
QA Engineer
Aaron's, IncRetail, 10,001+ employees