Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs. Silver Peak NX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN gives users the ability to manage connectivity across their WAN from a single dashboard that simplifies day to day monitoring and operations. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN can be cloud-managed or deployed on premise offering comprehensive routing, security and policy control, along with advanced analytics with the flexibility to connect to multiple clouds with greater speed, reliability, and efficiency. According to the vendor, it can be deployed across a small number of…N/A
Silver Peak NX
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Silver Peak NX appliances are WAN optimization solutions, sized for the smallest of branch offices to the world's largest data centers and disaster recovery sites, supporting up to 5 gigabits-per-second (Gbps) of WAN capacity and 512,000 simultaneous flows. Silver Peak is now part of Aruba, since the September 2020 acquisition of Silver Peak by HPE.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Catalyst SD-WANSilver Peak NX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Catalyst SD-WANSilver Peak NX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Catalyst SD-WANSilver Peak NX
Considered Both Products
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
Chose Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
We only compared Silver Peak NX and Cisco SD-WAN. Since we are primarily a Cisco infrastructure shop, it seemed to integrate better than Silver Peak. We liked the confirmed long-term support from Cisco we have grown accustomed to and did not want to take a chance on a new …
Chose Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
More mature product.
Chose Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
The management tools and the integration into our enterprise network are better with the Cisco solution. Similarity to other Cisco products has allowed us faster startup time and less training requirements.
Chose Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
We looked at several different solutions, but didn't do many side-by-side evaluations. Once we sat down and looked at the capabilities of Cisco SD-WAN we stopped our evaluation process and went into a try and buy program. We feel the try and buy program is the quickest way to a …
Chose Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
Cisco Meraki auto-VPN works great and easily in SMBs. Meraki has few limitations that won’t make it as number 1 choice for big customers. Cisco vip tela solution is more inclusive. It has all the integration's capability
Silver Peak NX
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Cisco Catalyst SD-WANSilver Peak NX
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Catalyst SD-WANSilver Peak NX
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(107 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(24 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(15 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Catalyst SD-WANSilver Peak NX
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
The best case, what I recommend to others and to clients to use is Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN one for is the case when you have a huge number of branches or small offices or remote offices, you name it. Even home offices, you have a large number and you want this whole infrastructure to be extremely easy to set up and also to have everything almost the same, not to have deviations from the standard configuration. This is the sweet spot for introducing Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
It works fantastic when you want to reduce network cost and get the same result than with an MPLS. It's less appropriate for big companies with a lot of small sites.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • We are able to use a multiple different circuits to go into the cloud, so we are not relying on just one particular private wireless. We're relying on wine circuits, ethernet, ethernet out. So it provides us that flexibility where we didn't have that before. Provides security that is very robust and flexible and scalable and it provides us with, the biggest thing is redundancy, where we have backup. For example, we have a Starlink for nuclear power plants. If our main circuits go down, we have that. And without Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN it would be very hard to actually achieve, to accomplish true redundancy. So we're happy with Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN in that regard.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • WAN Acceleration.
  • Improves application performance.
  • Reduce bandwidth costs.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • I will say the way we use it now, and I think what happened was the way it was deployed, it was fine, but unfortunately over the course of the years we've gotten a little out of hand with our device templates and feature templates. I think if there's any form of feedback that I would give to Cisco is how do we find ways to improve the environment as it stands so we get to a certain point with the environment and then we don't know how to undo it or fix it or optimize the environment. Because right now we're in a position where we're playing a lot of catch up and clean up and if there was a way or some tool or feature that we can take advantage of that would allow us to optimize that environment where we will kind of corner ourselves into a lot of problems in the future. There's some feature or something that we could take advantage of that will allow us to optimize that environment and not let it get out of control pretty easily. That would be my suggestion.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
I would rate SD-WAN highly because it has significantly improved network performance, reliability, and cost-efficiency for my organization. Its ability to optimize traffic dynamically, enhance security, and simplify management across multiple locations has been invaluable. With SD-WAN, we’ve reduced dependency on costly MPLS, improved cloud application performance, and gained greater control over our network infrastructure.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
The niche configurations are given equal focus as the standard use cases, which can make onboarding difficult in the beginning (ie why am I not using an entire tab of the portal), but aside from that part, the dashboard is relatively easy to navigate and apply the configuration. The metrics and analytics available are also nice to have in a single pane.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Cisco
I think if we could afford, we could have HA inplace but we planned out outage and workaround to avoid any outages.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Performance
Cisco
It does slow down over the period but it's same with other product. you need to clear/reboot services.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
Al ser soluciones integradas del portafolio de soluciones de Cisco, el soporte es transversal a cada uno de los componentes implementados, teniendo el cliente la capacidad de resolver sus inconvenientes bajo una misma infraestructura que está totalmente homologada, satisfacciendo de esta manera, las necesidades del cliente asi como permitiendo, que este se concentre en su negocio. Since the Cisco SD-WAN tools are a part of Cisco’s broader portfolio of solutions, support cross-cuts to each of our deployed components, with our company as the customer having the ability to solve our problems through the same, approved infrastructure. Their support team easily satisfies the customer’s needs so that they continue to focus on business functions.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
They need to improve their Spanish communication.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cisco
I was late to participate but my team was very happy with the outcome.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We've used the old Cisco SD-WAN, which no longer exists. It was a lot more complex to configure what is now called Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN. So they've definitely come a long way in that it is a lot less complicated to set up and template based.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Because of their WAN acceleration feature
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Cisco
I didn't take part of this decision but it always multiyear contract get best discount.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Cisco
Really strength in scalability. Only thigs it's depends on some prototype Cisco product which you can't work with other Cisco products.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Our branch offices can connect to our enterprise network and the internet quickly and securely, which has helped to increase productivity and reduce downtime.
  • We have been able to reduce our dependence on expensive MPLS connections, and instead utilize a combination of broadband and LTE connections, which are more cost-effective
  • The centralized location improves network visibility and troubleshooting process
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots