IBM Cloud Object Storage vs StorageGRID

Likelihood to Recommend

Scenarios where IBM Cloud Object Storage is well suited:

* Building enterprise-grade data solutions with large teams

* Where an all-in-one platform is needed to solve complex problems that require an ecosystem of tools to work together

* Where IBM services already exist in the business

* Projects where scalability, security and technology integration are key drivers

Scenarios where IBM Cloud Object Storage is not well suited:

* Small teams with small budgets may be better off using open source tools

* Solving niche industry problems that require niche solutions

Read full review

Ausrine S.

RPA Developer

InnoviorManagement Consulting, 11-50 employees

View all 79 answers on this topic

The NetApp StorageGRID solution fits in perfectly with what our company was trying to accomplish. Our goal was to free up our expensive storage flash (SSD) capacity for our critical applications to allow for growth and added performance capabilities. I do not believe this solution would be greatly suited for those without a Cloud solution or secondary site/system to tier data.

Read full review

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology

Education Management Company, 51-200 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Feature Rating Comparison

IBM Cloud Object Storage

StorageGRID

Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime

Dynamic scaling

Elastic load balancing

Monitoring tools

Security controls

Pros

IBM Cloud Object Storage is fast, secure, reliable and provides quick support when required.
Step by step documentation is easy to understand and implement for new users across the organization.
It is highly customizable and available based on the need of the use-case.

Read full review

Verified User

Consultant in Information Technology

Information Technology & Services Company, 5001-10,000 employees

View all 79 answers on this topic

Allows for very granular data tiering policies
Integrates seamlessly with our Cloud solution
Easy deployment
Easy to manage and adapt to a changing environment

Read full review

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology

Education Management Company, 51-200 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Cons

While this platform has been around, it does take some getting used. The interface could be refined. My Firefox Browser automatically closed when selecting some options and creating new objects as an example.
The tutorials are a bit outdated in comparison to the screens shown. We understand the system is constantly improving. The tutorials should reflect the changes in the interface.
There are many pre-trained models. However, it is not clear as to how those models were trained, what bias may exist in the training data, and how a user could improve those models unless we simply have to build our own.

Read full review

Dana Rafiee

Director of Worldwide Strategic Consulting

Destiny CorporationInformation Services, 51-200 employees

View all 79 answers on this topic

Initial network design can be tedious
Provide more out-of-the-box ILM policies
Include professional services time with each purchase

Read full review

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology

Education Management Company, 51-200 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Support Rating

IBM Cloud Object Storage 8.7

Based on 6 answers

I have been working in IT sector for more than 15 years. I have worked with various vendors. IBM's sales team, support team have been really helpful. After we start to use their product, their UX design team also contacted us to get feedback from us. They are really interested about our experience.

Read full review

Christopher J Evans

IT Manager

Nation FarmChemicals, 51-200 employees

View all 6 answers on this topic

StorageGRID 9.0

Based on 1 answer

NetApp Support was able to quickly resolve a networking issue during the deployment of the NetApp StorageGRID system, which we, unfortunately, could not figure out on our own. Not only did Support engage quickly, but they also provided guidance on how to properly troubleshoot various issues such as the one we encountered and also provided excellent documentation.

Read full review

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology

Education Management Company, 51-200 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Implementation Rating

IBM Cloud Object Storage 8.5

Based on 2 answers

IBM's professional service for migrating data and implementing new cloud environment was perfect. They started to help us before we begin to bring together all data such as how can it could be best to transfer all data without problems. During the migration they watched all the process closely to prevent any failure. Lastly, after the migration, they gave us trainings on implementation.

Read full review

Christopher J Evans

IT Manager

Nation FarmChemicals, 51-200 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

I have evaluated Amazon S3 and Google's Cloud Platform.IBM Cloud Platform is well documented and very integrated with its other range of cloud services.It's quite difficult to differentiate between them all. IBM Cloud Storage is not a service I would have considered on its own merit, but with the power of Watson, which was an absolute pleasure to work with, alongside the cloud server options, I think the IBM cloud ecosystem provides something for everyone.

Read full review

Keldon Alleyne

Programmer

Avasopht DevelopmentComputer Games, 1-10 employees

View all 79 answers on this topic

We chose NetApp StorageGRID because we were not looking for a true backup solution but wanted the features to included a DR centric ideology. The IBM Cloud Backup solution was purely backup focused and did not fit the requirements for our needs. NetApp StorageGRID checked all of our boxes in regards to cost, use case, and ease of manageability.

Read full review

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology

Education Management Company, 51-200 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Return on Investment

Prior to cloud storage, we used on-premises storage devices to store and backup, and sometimes it was a headache to scale up or down the storage according to our needs. With the introduction of Cloud Object Storage, we don't have to worry about scaling.
The uptime is also improved a lot after the introduction of Cloud Object Storage in our organization
Obviously, it's a very cost-effective way to store and archive data.

Read full review

Verified User

Contributor in Information Technology

Education Management Company, 201-500 employees

View all 79 answers on this topic

Added Flash capacity
Decreased application latency
Decreased data storage costs

Read full review

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology

Education Management Company, 51-200 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Pricing Details

General

Free Trial

Yes

Free/Freemium Version

Yes

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Yes

Entry-level set up fee?

No

IBM Cloud Object Storage Editions & Modules

Edition

Lite Plan	Free¹
Standard Plan	There is no minimum fee, pay only for what you use²

Up to 25 GB/mo. For all terms go to https://www.ibm.com/cloud/object-storage
For pricing and all terms go to https://www.ibm.com/cloud/object-storage

Additional Pricing Details

The Lite and Standard service plans for Cloud Object Storage include resiliency options, flexible data classes and built-in security. Pricing is based on your choice of location, storage class and resiliency choice.

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

StorageGRID Editions & Modules

—

Additional Pricing Details

—

Rating Summary

IBM Cloud Object Storage

StorageGRID

IBM Cloud Object Storage

StorageGRID

IBM Cloud Object Storage

StorageGRID

IBM Cloud Object Storage

StorageGRID

IBM Cloud Object Storage vs StorageGRID