CrowdStrike Falcon vs GlobalProtect Mobile Security Manager

• Ransomware protection. We ran a ransomware simulation with obfuscated executables to hide malware signatures and CrowdStrike found and stopped 15 out of 15.
• Malware/adware detection. Packaged adware in official installers are instantly blocked without interfering with the install of the primary application.

Read full review

• Easy to configure.
• Authentication rules can be made as strict as required to satisfy stringent audits.
• Easy for end users.

Read full review

• We get false positive detections when we run an email signature script for our users. These false positives can be a distraction. We've implemented a whitelist for those behaviors, but had some difficulty in figuring out how to configure CrowdStrike to recognize these executions since the file name and hash were always different (the executing file was firstname_lastname.exe, and that was too Vague to whitelist.

Read full review

• It lags a bit on new features
• It is best used with an entire Palo Alto environment

Read full review

• CrowdStrike has cut our security costs.
• Has given us more insight into our end points.
• It has helped with our older PC's CPU usage.
• Cut our cost and time from managing multiple platforms down to managing one platform with better insight than what we had with multiple security platforms.

Read full review

• It is a bit expensive to utilize to its full extent with other Palo products.
• The GUI is nice and is easy to train on.

Read full review