DIBELS Next vs. McGraw-Hill Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DIBELS Next
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
DIBELS Next are short (one minute) fluency measures that can be used for universal screening, benchmark assessment, and progress monitoring in Kindergarten - 6th grade, and are developed and maintained by the University of Oregon's Center on Teaching & Learning.N/A
McGraw-Hill Connect
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
McGraw-Hill Connect is an e-learning platform offered by McGraw-Hill Education. Features include course and assignment creation, grading, learning aides, e-books, and student portals.N/A
Pricing
DIBELS NextMcGraw-Hill Connect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DIBELS NextMcGraw-Hill Connect
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DIBELS NextMcGraw-Hill Connect
Best Alternatives
DIBELS NextMcGraw-Hill Connect
Small Businesses
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DIBELS NextMcGraw-Hill Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.8
(11 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.9
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
DIBELS NextMcGraw-Hill Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
University of Oregon
More intense face-to-face training would be beneficial. The students can utilize their accounts easily. I like the assessment three times per year & my access to see if a student has gained, and if not, then reasoning is given. Some of the reports are hard for families to follow and understand. Honestly, I preferred the computer interface from the past years as opposed to the current system.
Read full review
McGraw-Hill Education
Content is pretty good, and site is good as standalone tool, but it does not integrate will with any LMS. Grade pass back does not work with Google Classroom or Skyward (unsure about Power School or others) SSO works with Clever, but not Google, so students always have to go through Clever and cannot go directly from Google Classroom to an assignment, even if you posted to Google Classroom through the Connect portal. Problem sets are robust, but difficult to edit and assessments are designed to be web based. Formatting is poor when trying to print assessments that were created online.
Read full review
Pros
University of Oregon
  • On-going Reading/Phonics/Dyslexia Screening
  • Monthly Progress Monitoring
  • Easy for the students to use on their end
Read full review
McGraw-Hill Education
  • Integration with Canvas is seamless and easy to use.
  • Assignment completion, for students, is straightforward and easy to use.
  • The SmartBook allows students to read as they are tested with questions and this helps them learn the material easily without having first trying to read, memorize a chapter and then answer questions.
Read full review
Cons
University of Oregon
  • Presentation of the “how to”- I miss the older days of meeting for a week and learning the product inside & out.
  • More user-friendly format for those giving assessments-difficult to use the home page & areas within.
  • Parents/guardians have a difficult time with some of the written items, their lack of understanding.
Read full review
McGraw-Hill Education
  • The ebook is not a real ebook, it's really just a web page, or a series of webpages. It can only be accessed through MH Connect, therefore, when logging into the system. A real eBook would be able to be accessed as such-- on a Kindle or other e-Reader, or on a desktop eBook reader. The interface for this is also not very dynamic, just kind of obnoxious and Web 1.0.
  • Limited learning tools beyond simple exercises, at least from what I saw.
  • Terrible customer service. Long wait times with representatives who do not seem to understand their own product and cannot seem to answer very basic questions.
  • Hard to get resolution for basic problems.
Read full review
Usability
University of Oregon
No answers on this topic
McGraw-Hill Education
There is quite a steep learning curve in effectively navigating the site and using the resources. MGH seems to discourage integration with other sites, by only allowing links to their site rather than full assignment integration with grade pass back. Resources for teachers and students is good, but presentation format is different than many other programs, forcing both to learn another system.
Read full review
Support Rating
University of Oregon
No answers on this topic
McGraw-Hill Education
Personally, I did not encounter McGraw-Hill support. However, I worked with colleagues who needed support and were able to receive in a timely manner. Overall, McGraw Hill Connect is user-friendly (at least from teacher interface) and easy to navigate, which minimizes the need to reach out for support. The help button is useful and provides plenty of immediate support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
University of Oregon
Both provide BOY, MOY, & EOY Assessments. We Progress Monitor with both, but Renaissance is much easier for the students to use themselves. My students never complain about DIBELS Next testing (they like to see if they “move up.”) However, Renaissance is a product I have used successfully for many more years, and the ease of use is ideal when in a busy classroom.
Read full review
McGraw-Hill Education
McGraw-Hill is the most user-friendly and teacher-friendly for students and teachers. McGraw-Hill provided the online portion of learning that helped teachers provide the resources to students that were needed. Additionally, even though McGraw-Hill is wordy in its descriptions in the workbooks it was the least "wordy" of the other options provided to teachers, such as, Go Math.
Read full review
Return on Investment
University of Oregon
  • I’m not with the monetary element, but I would think our school has benefitted from this investment.
Read full review
McGraw-Hill Education
  • Improved efficiency from analysts looking to speed up the time it takes to do certain tasks.
  • Less waste on searching and researching how to do certain concepts.
  • Negative impact is use by individuals that can learn better through other methods that don't require activities.
Read full review
ScreenShots