Forcepoint CASB vs. Palo Alto Networks Next-Gen CASB

It is appropriate for medium to large-scale enterprises, especially the ones that have remote employees. The live-monitoring feature is extremely useful in this case. However, the implementation and initial processing are headache-inducing so you definitely need a dedicated IT team. Be warned though, that not only is their interface quite complex, their customer service is also extremely unhelpful so you won't be able to implement this or tackle any issues without a skilled team. But if that isn't an issue, this is definitely worth a try!

Incentivized

• Integration with Forcepoint DLP.
• Excellent in monitoring shadow IT.
• Cloud Monitoring can be conducted.
• UEBA is excellent.

Incentivized

• Better reports
• Better technical support
• Better integration with other solutions as proxy and onpremise DLP
• Did I say better support?

Incentivized

The platform is really good but needs a lot of customization and effort. Need to build an AI platform that will help in customizations.

Incentivized

The expertise is highly lacking in the implementation side.

Incentivized

The interface of both the softwares is complex, but Forcepoint is certainly more complicated. But once you get past that, it is quite smooth and offers a lot of amazing features. It is one of the best options for remote security, although I would love to see more features - like encryption. The one place where it truly lacks is customer service, and since it has such an intricate implementation procedure, this one carries a lot of weight and needs to be improved to make this software even more accessible.

Incentivized

• We are working on strategies to understand what to do with the information that CASB gave to us, it would be good if Forcepoint gives us a few key points but they haven't.

Incentivized