Forcepoint NGFW vs. Symantec Encrypted Traffic Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Forcepoint NGFW
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) promises seamless and central management, whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Administrators can deploy, monitor and update thousands of firewalls, VPNs and IPSs in minutes, all from a single console. The vendor says that the product reduces network operating expenses by as much as 50%. Advanced clustering for firewalls and networks eliminates downtime, and administrators can rapidly map business processes into strong, accurate controls to…N/A
Symantec Encrypted Traffic Management
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
The Symantec Encrypted Traffic Management solution (formerly from Blue Coat Security) delivers encrypted traffic management solutions providing comprehensive, policy-based visibility and control over encrypted traffic, maximizing its benefits and minimizing its risks. According to the vendor, Blue Coat, can establish a holistic encrypted traffic management strategy that meets various business needs and addresses security, corporate and compliance mandates. Visibility and Control…N/A
Pricing
Forcepoint NGFWSymantec Encrypted Traffic Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Forcepoint NGFWSymantec Encrypted Traffic Management
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Forcepoint NGFWSymantec Encrypted Traffic Management
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Forcepoint NGFWSymantec Encrypted Traffic Management
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint NGFW
8.1
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Symantec Encrypted Traffic Management
-
Ratings
Identification Technologies5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Tools5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Inspection10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
VPN9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
High Availability9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Forcepoint NGFWSymantec Encrypted Traffic Management
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Forcepoint NGFWSymantec Encrypted Traffic Management
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Forcepoint NGFWSymantec Encrypted Traffic Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Forcepoint
If you are looking for a smaller network/security team, the ease and low complexity create an easy to manage environment. One engineer can easily manage 100 nodes/locations. If you are just starting to get security conscious and predict regular adjustments to policy, routing, and access, this is a very good system for making easy to understand and low impact changes on a regular basis without operations interruption.
Read full review
Broadcom
The Blue Coat encrypted traffic management system is still one of better tools to control, monitor, and secure internet use by employees on a company's network.
Read full review
Pros
Forcepoint
  • Easy to manage and make changes on - ACL's are done with ease.
  • Easy USB initial configuration - The easy initial setup of a new location and firewall saves massive time. Settings are automatically pushed to new nodes upon contact with the controller.
  • Low Complexity - This system does not have a lot of complexity requiring extra hours, training, or personnel to manage.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • It can control, monitor and secure internet use by employees
  • It can be used to provide user groups accessing necessary web resources.
  • Identify the possible violations or troubleshooting
Read full review
Cons
Forcepoint
  • Poor Reporting - It exists but even when calling in to support for assistance, they have no idea how to tackle customizing reports or searching for specific data.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Categories changes more specified or detailing
  • Some categories are confused to cause access denies
  • Some functionalities can be simplified
Read full review
Usability
Forcepoint
The Graphical User Interface is very easy to read, understand and work with. The usability of this product is very high.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Forcepoint
Support has varied over the history of the company. Terro is a name that comes up often with the best of service from this company.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Forcepoint
There are similar hardware and license costs between the two products. The Forcepoint NGFW product is by far easier to use and manage.
Read full review
Broadcom
Blue Coat Encrypted Traffic Management gives you a means to layered control internet accesses to differentiate teams or groups accordingly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Forcepoint
  • Efficiency/Productivity increase. The company moved from Cisco firewall and routing hardware to Forcepoint NGFW. It now takes fewer people and fewer hours to manage the new product. This has allowed the company to put the man-hours to use on other projects and tasks.
  • Long term viability. This has been a concern in the past when the company started as Stonegate, merged to become Stonesoft then got purchased by McAfee, then McAfee got purchased by Intel. However, with Forcepoint the product seems to have found a stable home.
  • Low complexity. The Web GUI based system for management has reduced the cost of personnel and training required. There is no longer a need for the company to have higher trained and higher salary cost employees to manage the system. Mid-level admins at lower salaries are capable of managing the GUI based system with ease.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Definitely the tools give us a better means to manage internet usage.
  • With other network tools/appliances, it protects company's assets.
Read full review
ScreenShots