GoTo Meeting vs. TeamViewer

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GoTo Meeting
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
From GoTo (formerly LogMeIn), GoToMeeting is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that enables users to connect via the internet. It hosts a suite of online meeting tools, including real-time screen sharing and integrated audio.
$12
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
TeamViewer
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Teamviewer offers secure remote access, IT support and device management on a scalable platform. It speeds up problem resolution, reduces downtime and enhances control through automation, unattended access and complete visibility of every device and location.
$24.90
per month (billed annually) 1 Licensed User
Pricing
GoTo MeetingTeamViewer
Editions & Modules
Professional
$12.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Business
$16.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 250 Participants [billed annually]
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
3,000 Participants
Remote Access
$24.90
per month (billed annually) 1 Licensed User
Business
$50.90
per month (billed annually) 1 Licensed User
Premium
$102.90
per month (billed annually) 15 Licensed Users
Corporate
$206.90
per month (billed annually) 30 Licensed Users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoTo MeetingTeamViewer
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsPricing available by monthly or annual subscription, with discounts for annual commitments.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GoTo MeetingTeamViewer
Considered Both Products
GoTo Meeting
Chose GoTo Meeting
It is easy to use and works well for small meetings. Zoom has more features, but GoTo Meeting is simpler and cheaper. We chose it because it’s a good fit for our needs.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is very similar to DialPad. GoTo Meeting and Dialpad are both cloud-based communication but are very different from one another. Theres less guess work in how to use GoTo Meeting, whereas the Dialpad app took a while getting used to. While I have enjoyed both, …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is a simpler product and easier to use than teams however it is lacking is some of the features that teams has mainly integration with the rest for the office 365 suite.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Very basic and will require you to likely user other software. I think this is why people prefer to use teams because they can do so much in one place. It is way more than just conferencing.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is more cross-platform compatible as compared to most of the other alternatives, the interface is more User friendly as compared to most of the other alternatives, it is more affordable as compared to most of the other alternatives, the process of accessing it is …
Chose GoTo Meeting
I find GoTo Meeting sleeker and more professional in it's interface, the connection seems more stable as well.
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is cheaper but in general, both systems are comparable. Webex is also intuitive and offers good audio and video quality as well as basic online meeting features like screen sharing, whiteboard etc. We used GoTo Meeting with some external companies who find Webex …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting was more affordable and easier to implement than these options.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Microsoft Teams and Skype are really costly than GoTo Meeting. Only GoTo Meeting is best for online weekly or daily review calls.
Chose GoTo Meeting
It was highly recommend and proven to have great quality and easy features for all age employees that I have. Also can be useful on the go and on your cellphone
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is easier to use, with a focus on streamlined controls. The clean and less cluttered meeting environment makes it easier to get things done. The pricing of GoTo Meeting is more competitive than Zoom making it a better option for small businesses like mine. All in …
Chose GoTo Meeting
We find that Google Meet doesn't integrate well externally and you can't managed attendee lists, keep them private, manage follow ups with a record on Google Meet. It's a great service to use for meeting locally with internal collogues but just doesn't meet our needs as our …
Chose GoTo Meeting
At first, I never thought that this platform is existing because I have been exposed to different platform before, not until I was employed in my current company and I can say that it helps me to communicate with my colleague . If there's an urgent concern regarding the task, I …
Chose GoTo Meeting
Skype doesn't allow as many integration as in GoTo Meeting e.g
Calendar Integration with emails
Auto email to participants
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is good for small organizations. For my personal use I prefer google meet but for professional use I like to use GoTo Meeting. It gives a good quality video and audio which is something that make you compare the product with other similar products. The free …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting is substantially better. Much more reliable and easier for participants to join. We have never had a "zoombomb" with GoTo Meeting but we did with Zoom working with a prospective investor. It was hard to come back from what the client saw! Zoom is not an option for …
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meetings has no time limit for sessions with more than x attendees. GoTo Meetings provides an easy way to allow attendees to share their screens. GoTo Meeting does not require membership/license/registration attendees; they are not required to download the desktop …
Chose GoTo Meeting
For meetings, it stacks reasonably well, although pricey for larger firms.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Many times, it seems like GoTo Meeting requires less bandwidth to run. We noticed with a few test machines that if you have over twenty video streams, this product could handle the load better than if we used Microsoft Teams and had many video streams.
Chose GoTo Meeting
Our CIO made the decision - all the products work well. He travels a lot and preferred the GoTo Meeting mobile app over the other applications' mobile capability. The cost basis was similar to both Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Our users had familiarity with GoTo Meeting which …
Chose GoTo Meeting
I also love that GoTo Meeting has a mobile app for working on the go. If your WiFi isn't working well, you can also dial in to listen to the meeting. Additionally, if you are not able to join at all, there is a recording feature to ensure you are not missing out.
Chose GoTo Meeting
We evaluated both Zoom workplace and GoTo Meeting, but then we decided to go with GoTo Meeting due to it's attractive price offering.
TeamViewer
Chose TeamViewer
TeamViewer does as much, if not more, for client connectivity. Both allow copious notes for each support connection. Client-based MDM would be a valuable addition for our specific needs.
Chose TeamViewer
TeamViewer offers more advanced features than AnyDesk e.g. TeamViewer Dex which automatically tracks user's system performance and provides proactive issue resolution. This feature helps to fix common IT issues automatically and reduces manual intervention.
Chose TeamViewer
I have used Anydesk for little over an year and currently using TeamViewer. AnyDesk is a very light software which doesn't require heavy RAM to run also its very stable than TeamViewer most importantly its cheaper than TeamViewer.

But TeamViewer stands out in terms of loaded …
Chose TeamViewer
Although it is the most expensive on the market, it has many built-in features and, above all, resilience and security. It is much more practical to work with when there is a need to provide constant support to many users.On the downside, I see that it is very dependent on a …
Chose TeamViewer
1. AnyDesk stops working in between. And not many users use AnyDesk. It has a complex permission section where users are not able to give remote permissions easily, which consumes time. 2. Zoom Meetings is slow in remote access response and it's time bounded when it comes to a …
Chose TeamViewer
TeamViewer is a go-to product for almost all newbies and smaller organizations, allowing multiple simultaneous connections and the ability to transfer files, letting you serve multiple clients at once.
Chose TeamViewer
Apple Remote Desktop requires a VPN connection to the LAN to be useful, but it is still necessary to use it when TeamViewer will not connect. Datto RMM seems very solid, and I like it, though I only have access to it from our MPS. It can often connect when the TV cannot. …
Chose TeamViewer
TeamViewer is easier to use, has a better UI that I can control more easily than others, is faster, and I think it uses less bandwidth than others. Also, 5 stars for me, it has a better chat display that can be shown or hidden according to our needs during the remote session. …
Chose TeamViewer
Saw several other users comment and praise TeamViewer, saw they had a "free" option, downloaded it, and started using it; it fits our needs well.
Chose TeamViewer
Compared to the RMM features of NinjaOne, Datto RMM, and N-Able, TeamViewer's RMM toolkit is thinner and less automated. The TeamViewer RMM features are not as robust as those of dedicated RMM platforms, like the ones I mentioned above. This is an important point to keep in …
Chose TeamViewer
MS Teams is good, but not on all our devices. We also experience more latency issues with MS Teams. TeamViewer has a small footprint on the devices and just seems to work.
Chose TeamViewer
For mobile, TeamViewer was much better, especially since some of them don't support mobile devices at all. Performance seems to be generally better than AnyDesk and on par with ScreenConnect in both performance and the feature set. One system not in the list above is RustDesk. …
Chose TeamViewer
We choose TeamViewer over AnyDesk due to its advanced and more secured features. It also offered us better pricing on corporate licensing.
Chose TeamViewer
TeamViewer is superior with remote assistance when our user is at statile site where there is no VPN tunnel implemented. All we have to do instead is just send users an email with the invitation for remote access, and we can assist those who have trouble. Highly recommended …
Chose TeamViewer
TeamViewer has a stronger more stable connection for accessing other devices such as mobile devices.

I tried adding mobile devices into teams meetings using my teams account, however the presentation has not always been the best.
Chose TeamViewer
TeamViewer is a little more robust than many of the other options that we have compared it to. The patching and package deployment option alone sets it apart. The ability to conduct file transfers from machine to machine also gives it an edge where other options have come up …
Chose TeamViewer
Pricing wise, the TeamViewer license is a lot more costly, but makes up for it in feature-richness and reliability. Pulseway has the benefit of having the possibility to keep an eye the IT infrastructure so you can catch things before they go wrong but our main focus was a …
Chose TeamViewer
Anydesk is a great tool but TeamViewer is already established at our organization and switch would require software re-installation for each managed computer.
Chose TeamViewer
Found TeamViewer expensive compared to other services, but it does work efficiently. LogMeIn has become incredibly expensive, hence moving away from them. Splashtop is more cost-effective but perhaps not quite so reliable.
Chose TeamViewer
End-to-end and transport encryption, Multi-factor authentication, Secure transfer of patches, logs, configuration files, and backups during support sessions or deployments.
Chose TeamViewer
TeamViewer's cost is much lower than that of other solutions, and its security is far superior to RemotePC's. TeamViewer is also a request-based remote session manager, unlike other software that allows indefinite connection time. TeamViewer's free version makes it even better …
Features
GoTo MeetingTeamViewer
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
2% above category average
TeamViewer
-
Ratings
High quality audio8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
High quality video8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
TeamViewer
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Whiteboards8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
TeamViewer
-
Ratings
Calendar integration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting initiation8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with social media7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Record meetings / events8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Slideshows8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
TeamViewer
-
Ratings
Live chat8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience polling8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Q&A8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
TeamViewer
-
Ratings
User authentication8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
-
Ratings
TeamViewer
8.7
Ratings
0% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Remote Administration
Comparison of Remote Administration features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
-
Ratings
TeamViewer
8.7
Ratings
3% above category average
File transfer00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Instant message00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Access to sleeping/powered-off computers00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Session record00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Annotations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
-
Ratings
TeamViewer
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Third-party software integrations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Remote Access
Comparison of Remote Access features of Product A and Product B
GoTo Meeting
-
Ratings
TeamViewer
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Attended device access00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Unattended device access00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Mobile device access00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Virtual device access00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Multiple-display support00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Multiple concurrent sessions00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GoTo MeetingTeamViewer
Small Businesses
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Getscreen.me
Getscreen.me
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 9.8 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.7 out of 10
Remote Desktop Manager
Remote Desktop Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GoTo MeetingTeamViewer
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.6
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Configurability
4.5
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
3.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
4.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GoTo MeetingTeamViewer
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft Teams has always given us issues if we run an extensive meeting with more than 30 participants. Often, HR would train many people at once, and call quality would degrade or crash. This provides a good alternative when Teams is not working correctly, but we must continue orientation or training. It is inappropriate for all meetings since we are embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem, and Teams integrates well with SharePoint.
Read full review
Helpful for organized IT teams supporting multiple manufacturing warehouse zones. Useful for training, auditing, and meeting ISO/quality or compliance documentation requirements. False positives can lock users out unexpectedly, particularly common when supporting remote home users. Session connections can be interrupted, which is painful when configuring warehouse automation systems and printers that require a restart.
Read full review
Pros
  • Calendar Scheduling: It prepares us for all meetings, automatically sends reminders, and ensures we never miss a meeting.
  • Ease of Scheduling: Scheduling a meeting is straightforward and saves us a lot of time.
  • The screen-sharing feature allows us to present documents and plans effortlessly during client calls.
  • We use the recording feature extensively for training purposes, especially for the onboarding of new members.
Read full review
  • Quick support is an nice feature to make it easy for the end user to download and use
  • Easy to connect using numbers
  • The connection is always good when connected to an end user
  • The tool is easy to use, the buttons are easy to understand what the use for it is
Read full review
Cons
  • Lack of security updates (Not sure if they are taking care of but they should make users aware of it frequently)
  • Brand recognition improvement (Specifically in the US market where many customers still prefer Zoom)
  • Many prospects still consider GoTo as a legacy platform compared to Meet, Teams, Zoom. This is not a missing feature but GoTo team should really position themselves as innovative rather than pre-existing perceived notion of being legacy.
Read full review
  • Now, it doesn’t work in fast network environments: sometimes, data is delayed during transfer.
  • There are a small number of ways that a user is allowed to change the interface on the device.
  • Some minor increases in difficulty with advanced functions of the application.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We used other software like goto meetings but found it best because of its user friendly interface and easy interfacing. It helped us in COVID and now we can say we are depending on it and love it. We recommend it to our friends company and they are also using it. It is very affordable and easy to integrate with system
Read full review
As long as I continue to provide remote support for my clients, it's a no brainier. For what I pay out, I probably make it back tenfold in the ability to provide remote support from wherever and whenever. Not to mention the saved gas money for a fix that only takes 5 minutes but it takes you 20 minutes to get there. As my business continues to grow, and I support more and more clients, my need for TeamViewer will only grow.
Read full review
Usability
The simplicity of GoToMeetings desktop, mobile, and web-based applications make it a very robust and user-friendly meeting solution. At times, it may be more complex than needed, but it is nice to have so many features that can be used if needed. Once installed, it is very easy to use and navigate.
Read full review
Compared to other products I've used (ConnectWise Control), TeamViewer is harder to set up and get connected. It is especially difficult to set up "permanent" unattended remote access, where you want to be able to connect to and control a remote computer without having to exchange codes and passwords every time you connect.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
This application has always been available. Never an issue
Read full review
We get what we need with our TeamViewer licence.
Read full review
Performance
This application is fast. Loads fast, no stall
Read full review
Steady connection and easy quick connect and disconnect
Read full review
Support Rating
When we have issues, they seem to respond quickly and do everything they can to help us. They have even tried to find other ways we could get more use out of their product, or improve the way we are currently using it. Overall, their support has been fairly good for us.
Read full review
The support from the Teamviewer team has always been top notch. Any support ticket that we have submitted has been handled very quickly and with the best possible resolution. We find in most cases, contacting for a support ticket is not even necessary, as the knowledge base is more than adequate.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
As expected without any problem! Alternate in-person training is another efficient way to learn how a product works. There are many third party supporters for TeamViewer courses available that can give additional ideas how to use TeamViewer for specific functions and features as we did require in respect of our usage.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
I have never used the online training either. I have watched a few informational videos that were helpful when learning how to do a specific procedure within TeamViewer and get the most out of the software by utilizing one of the many features that are available with the software. Again, 5 if for neutral.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
It was very easy and self-explanatory.
Read full review
TeamViewer installation and deployment to other devices is pretty straightforward and does not require much technical know-how. This makes ease of use attractive when supporting both new and existing clients with limited technical knowledge. I think ease of use is a huge factor in getting new clients. TeamViewer handles that extremely well.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
GoTo Meetings has no time limit for sessions with more than x attendees. GoTo Meetings provides an easy way to allow attendees to share their screens. GoTo Meeting does not require membership/license/registration attendees; they are not required to download the desktop application. They can attend from the web if they choose to do so.
Read full review
Apple Remote Desktop requires a VPN connection to the LAN to be useful, but it is still necessary to use it when TeamViewer will not connect. Datto RMM seems very solid, and I like it, though I only have access to it from our MPS. It can often connect when the TV cannot. ScreenConnect was not a good fit for us and did not seem to work well.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I've rarely had problems with the product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has improved the efficiency of our sales meetings, allowing us to close deals faster and with greater clarity.
  • There has been a 15% increase in our sales conversion rates.
  • The ability to effectively conduct in-house training has improved team productivity and reduced costs associated with in-person training.
Read full review
It took about 3 months.
  • Customer Support of our business has become more interactive with customers, leading to faster resolution of their problems.
  • Remotely accessing devices in our office allows employees to stay productive while working from home.
  • TeamViewer helps us to collaborate with other firms for projects we're doing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GoTo Meeting Screenshots

Screenshot of GoTo App - Create Meeting (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Join Meeting (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Meeting (In Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Mobile Meetings (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Screen Share Meeting (In Session)

TeamViewer Screenshots

Screenshot of how TeamViewer lets users connect to devices and provide remote support.Screenshot of AI, automation and remediation.Screenshot of the interface to monitor and manage devices proactively.Screenshot of some of TeamViewer's integrations.