Graylog vs. NetWitness Cloud SIEM

For small companies, Graylog is the best solution possible. It's easy to configure and "just works." Above everything else, it's free. The only thing I hold against it is the fact that it's Linux-based. [This] makes sense because Elasticsearch is Linux-based. But Linux adds a layer of complexity that we don't need for something basic as a logging server. I'm pretty sure that we would have had a logging server years earlier if I had to convince quite a few decision-making people to go ahead with it anyway.

Incentivized

It is really a robust platform that can be heavily customized to suit requirements. Good for advanced hunting and forensics. Robust automation features.

Incentivized

• Graylog does a great job of its core function: log aggregation, retention, and searching.
• Graylog has a very flexible configuration. The backend for storage is Elasticsearch and MongoDB is used to store the configuration. You have to option to make your configuration as simple as possible by storing everything on one box, or you can scale everything out horizontally by using a cluster of Elasticsearch nodes and MongoDB servers with several Graylog servers pointed to all the necessary nodes.
• Graylog does a good job of abstracting away a fair portion of Elasticsearch index management (sharding, creation, deletion, rotation, etc).

Incentivized

• Log collection and parsing.
• Packet collection and parsing.
• Enhanched analytics and alerting.
• Robust integration.

Incentivized

• Support for more log sources
• Event alerts/emails - Some cases where unable to separate data from multiple clients, and no easy fix
• API - Limits results to 10,000 and can cause server to lockup on queries that exceed the limit

Incentivized

• Lacking out of the box best practice templates etc. It relies heavily on customization.
• Lack of up to date threat feeds.
• Difficult to learn and use initially.

Incentivized

Community support does not give simple straightforward answers; simply search up Graylog Issues and look at some of the responses on the forums. The documentation is your only hope if you are on the free version, as you can NOT purchase only support. The few times I have worked with Graylog Enterprise support they were great though.

Incentivized

In terms of log aggregation, the free product fully stacks up with the competitors listed. Full control over the data ingests for flexible configuration. Graylog even better on that front than AlienVault USM because you cannot configure the variable mapping. We haven't used the threat exchange stuff or correlation. But with regex searches, we have created function dashboards that show threat theater pictures of our network based on logs from our firewall.

Incentivized

Best in Class for us, and was a good choice since we already are using a lot of other RSA products(DLP, Archer etc.)

Incentivized

• Graylog is just less expensive than some other options which meant it fit into our budget otherwise we might not be able to justify a higher cost.
• Being able to track issues that we normally couldn't track using other tools is a bonus to help us know of any issues we have and can fix before an outage or failure that could potentially cost money.
• We have had to spend more time than I would like to understand and customize Graylog which has taken time away from other tasks and projects.

Incentivized

• Hard to calculate ROI since it is not revenue based.
• It is a expensive solution, bit very capable.

Incentivized