Highfive was a web conferencing platform acquired by Dialpad in 2020. Its functionality became part of the now obsolete Dialpad Meetings, the functionality of which is now contained in Dialpad Connect.
N/A
Zoom Workplace
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Zoom Workplace, Zoom’s open collaboration platform with an AI Companion, empowers teams to be more productive, and strengthen customer relationships throughout the customer lifecycle with Zoom’s Business Services for sales, marketing, and customer experience teams, including Zoom Contact Center.
I like UberConference much more than Webex. While a lot of our external vendors and clients are more familiar with Webex, UberConference is much easier to use and does not require you to download an app. Webex is also pretty clunky and requires you to switch presenters in order …
Webex is quite clunky. The user interface is not as simple to use as UberConference and you have to download an app in order to use it on your desktop. Because of this, new users are often late to meetings because of the time it takes to download the app. UberConference doesn't …
UberConference is comparable to the other platforms for conference calls. We use Zoom internally but vendors use it to schedule our demo calls for their products and services.
Uberconference in my opinion is the best software out there. One of the things that makes it especially better than all of the other options is that there is no additional software needed for us our our clients. We used to have so many issues with downloading software and …
UberConference is free and easy to start and invite users to. It lacks the features of other paid options like Zoom and Slack, and even Zoom's free plan can often satisfy many of our requirements over UberConference.
Zoom is the winner of the space in my mind. It has all the features I want, works reliably, and the price is okay. Skype is a dumpster fire, has definite failures, and is a nightmare to admin. Hangouts is only suited to small companies and lacks recording, which is crucial.
Zoom and Cisco both prompt you to install their software, which I don't like. I don't like having to install plugins every time a new person invites me to a call. Uberconference doesn't do that.
Zoom is great for one on one communication and screen sharing, so we often use it for those purposes instead of UberConference. However we always choose UberConference over Google Hangouts, since we've had issues in the past with poor audio and video quality. UberConference …
UberConference is easy to schedule and set up for both me and other parties to the conference. I like that it has an iPhone app, and that it recognizes my various phone numbers. UberConference is far more reliable from a sound quality perspective than ANY of its competitors. …
UberConference and Zoom have overlapping functionality, but not 100%. UberConference does teleconferencing really well - it makes it very easy to call in and collaborate with a group of people. But for screen sharing, Zoom outshines UberConference. Zoom doesn't use as much …
UberConference carries much less administrative overhead than WebEx or GoToMeeting. UberConference's interface is superior to free conference call because you can see who is on the call, mute individuals, and get a tracking report of who spent how much time speaking at the end …
We used Dialpad and Teams previously and both were fine. When we were looking at scheduling software, we looked at Calendly. Ultimately, it was cheaper to use Zoom Workplace for phone, video and scheduling and we really liked our Zoom Workplace support team. Calendly and Zoom …
Zoom blew all the others (GoToMeeting, Skype, Google Hangouts, UberConference) out of the water. Free consumer solutions didn't have the reliability, scheduling, privacy, recording, or headcount capabilities that Zoom boasts. GoToMeeting and Webex are old and clunky to use, …
Zoom is much easier to use and has a better-integrated feature set compared to UberConfernce. I feel the layout is a lot more functional and it's easier to use the record, share, mute features on the fly when in a live meeting or call than it is with UberConfernce.
Zoom performs consistently: my team and I don't have to worry about it failing. While the audio can be better, it's not any worse than GoToMeeting (it's better actually) or Skype for Business. It integrates well with our apps (Outlook) and the iOS app performs very nicely. The …
Zoom has every feature they have and more. We selected Zoom because it was the best out there with good ease of use. Also, users know the name and they have a position view of it.
UberConference was the easiest one I've used, but the call quality was terrible which was the main factor behind why we switched. GoToMeeting and Join.me were great solutions as well, but Zoom was next in ease of use. The call quality was the best we found and easiest for …
We found that with other solutions, either the meeting client was buggy (UberConference) or had features we’d never use (WebEx). Zoom was found to be much more cost effective than the other solutions we tested, and the call quality was above the rest.
Zoom has much better quality and less "hang ups" than both Uber Conference and Google Hangouts. Specifically compared to Uber Conference, we often will switch to Zoom midway through a meeting due to the deteriorating quality. Specifically compared to Google Hangouts, we use …
Zoom has overlapping service similarities to UberConference, but they are not all the same. UberConference is what we used prior to Zoom, and it can do teleconferencing and screen sharing, but it does not have video capacity. Zoom has the video conferencing and screen …
Skype is just very unreliable in my opinion. The used to have a lot of quality problems on the calls. UberConference we liked a lot their simple UX approach, the web-hosted structure, and the beautiful UI, but we had multiple call-quality issues as well. We don't have those …
I've generally used Skype less and less over the years... the main reason to do so is that I find the other party uses a different system than me, but we both have Skype accounts. The address book that I've built over the years is probably the main reason that this app is …
It is competitively priced and offers robust functionality. It was an easy decision to use Zoom over these others. Mainly value for the price made it an easy decision. A critical component was reliable connection (audio and visual) and ability to recording capabilities.
I haven't used GoToMeeting for about a year but the functionality seems pretty similar, I remember GoToMeeting having a very robust calendar function and you could add meetings straight from gmail which was really helpful - I haven't seen this with Zoom.
As mentioned previously, I have substantial experience with GoToMeeting, Join.Me, UberConference, and Zoom. Zoom is heads and shoulders above that crowd in my personal opinion. The only reason we considered/tested/used Join.Me and UberConference over Zoom in the first place is …
We used to use UberConference which didn't have video and wasn't customizable in the way that Zoom is for our team. It's just a more professional experience when interacting with customers and that for me is what is more valuable when using a tool like Zoom for customer calls …
The free version I would absolutely recommend, we've had some great use out of it for the past few years. Presenting, sharing screen, the conference line and some other features are all free. If we did need more analytics and more features, perhaps making it easier for the potential customer to share screen, we might re-start the search and we'd potentially rate UberConference lower, but for the free version it's been great for us.
Integration with other products and the AI summaries have been huge wins for Zoom Workplace in our organization. They have been life changing for our team. Also, being able to make and receive calls from our cell phones rather than have to give out personal cell phone numbers has been wildly successful with our attorneys.
I appreciate being able to select a local phone number: it adds credibility and convenience for in-market clients/prospects.
I like being able to customize the hold music. One of our employees wrote and produced custom hold music for Anvil, which generates discussion and engagement as an ice-breaker.
The screen sharing is easy-to-use and is far more reliable than in the past. Prospects and clients do not have to download any app to make it work properly.
I love how easy it is to set the focus on the presenter. It is annoying when people don't spotlight themselves as a presenter, so you get to see the whole gallery of attendees in smaller, two-inch windows.
I like the capability of having break-out rooms. Even though I don't use them very often, it is nice to have them available if the right situation presents itself for smaller group chats.
The recording quality is better than I have experienced with other products (Microsoft Teams, WebEx, etc.), and the fact that it is already an MP4, so I don't have to convert it for publishing on our intranet is huge to me.
Allow a way to group individual people chats - not channels just individual peeps into groups for ease of finding - like how you can group shared calendars into sections in Outlook
UberConference is more expensive than some of its competitors and we have not found a real advantage to using UberConference over certain less-expensive applications. UberConference charges per month per organizer and those costs add up quickly, so we will be moving forward with a more budget-friendly option in the coming months.
We're sticking with Zoom for the foreseeable future--given its compelling feature set, ease of use, and advanced technology, there's just no other competition to be excited about. Plus it's a Gartner-recognized industry leader, so it's a rather easy choice.
The interface is intuitive and stupidly simple, no complicated sub-menus or configuration settings. Easy to create a meeting space and then have others join with a link or dial-in PIN on the free tier. On the paid tier it's even easier with PIN-less joining and automatic reminder calls to get participants to join.
Zoom is made for the non tech office. It has features that can be made to do what you need to run things on a day to day basis. Immediately we we able to get meetings going with remote employees. The ability to be able to add smartphone connected people was a big plus. Zoom met our needs at the time.
There have been less than a handful of outages during our two years with Zoom, and whenever there was one, an email informing us of the outage went out immediately, and they had the issue resolved shortly thereafter.
Zoom has among the best performance of any video conference platform, as I've mentioned several times. Besides that, their Chat platform works great, and their back end always runs smooth. It's unfortunate that reporting can now only be done by one month at a time, but nonetheless, it only takes a second to run any kind of Zoom report, whether it's an attendee report, Poll results, a user report, a list of meetings from the past month, etc.
I haven't needed support for the most part, which is a positive for Highfive. It's intuitive and most features are straightforward to use. In the one instance that I did contact them, it took them longer then expected to respond, but they were able to answer my question once they did.
Because I got a response right away, and was assigned one specific individual to work with me from the beginning to the resolution. I had an actual email address and direct contact with this person without having to start over and over every time I contacted Zoom - this singular individual remained attentive and was well informed on the subject matter and quite able to resolve my needs.
If you receive any pushback from higher ups, point to any of the various positive reviews like this one. Or show Zoom's excellent Gartner report, or articles describing Zoom's partnership with Sequoia capital. It's not difficult to show how Zoom is a trustworthy industry leader with best-in-class technology.
Uberconference is by far more reliable and has a better quality of service than the other providers in this space. I have never had a dropped call with Uberconference (unlike Skype and Hangouts). I do think they need to do more marketing because fewer people know about them than others and sometimes people decline to use the service so we have to use one of the other platforms to connect.
Zoom Workplace is typically on the more expensive end against other options, but it's the industry leader for a reason. It has the most brand credibility by far, but that doesn't mean it's perfect. There are limitations when it comes to technical performance, customization and video/audio quality. I prefer Slack myself for communication apps, but Zoom Workplace is a good alternative.
The billing and price model is really fair for so many functions that they offer, our remote work requires each of the features that Zoom offers, so accepting payment for a tool like this is the least we can do. I like that billing arrives on time and that they offer opportunities and payment times.
Because the Basic licenses are completely free, and because it's very easy to configure and install Zoom, and because anyone can join Zoom from a link without needing an account, scaling is a Breeze. There are absolutely no roadblocks. My company keeps adding more Zoom Pro license every week since it's so in demand. We were able to convert users from several different platforms onto Zoom with no trouble at all.
Zoom is perfect for our business. We use it to video chat with prospective clients. The name recognition alone gives us credibility and it is very easy to screen share and send content out.
Our teams use this every day. It makes it easy to meet with clients and share a screen and display analytics.
Some of my clients thought that they need to register first to be able to contact me. It's bad that they are not notified in any way that it's enough just to enter its names and that's it.