TrustRadius

HPA RPA-as-a-Service vs. SAP Build

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HPA RPA-as-a-Service
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
HPA, A Cognizant Company, for over 10 years has helped more than 90 clients achieve greater operational efficiency and cost savings through automation. HPA's RPA-as-a-Service model makes automation accessible to companies who lack the resources to build their own robotic process automation initiatives. HPA builds, deploys, runs, and maintains RPA initiatives so that clients can realize greater return on their investment, at a lower total cost of ownership than traditional licensed software.…N/A
SAP Build
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP Build is a low-code app development and automation suite used to visually create apps, automate end-to-end processes, and design business sites with drag-and-drop simplicity. The solution includes a library with more than 300+ prebuilt business content and connectors for SAP and non-SAP systems to help users get started.
$1.82
per month per user
Pricing
HPA RPA-as-a-ServiceSAP Build
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
SAP Build Process Automation - Standard User
$1.82
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Advanced User
$15
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Attended Automation
$534
per month
SAP Build Process Automation - Unattended Automation
$534
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HPA RPA-as-a-ServiceSAP Build
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsHPA creates custom pricing proposals for every implementation.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HPA RPA-as-a-ServiceSAP Build
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
HPA RPA-as-a-ServiceSAP Build
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
HPA RPA-as-a-Service
-
Ratings
SAP Build
7.9
29 Ratings
8% below category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings8.321 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings8.620 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings7.528 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings8.127 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings7.627 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings7.228 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HPA RPA-as-a-ServiceSAP Build
Small Businesses
airSlate SignNow
airSlate SignNow
Score 8.5 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Build
SAP Build
Score 8.6 out of 10
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HPA RPA-as-a-ServiceSAP Build
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(33 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(30 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
HPA RPA-as-a-ServiceSAP Build
Likelihood to Recommend
Cognizant
No answers on this topic
SAP
As mentioned, the integration between SAP Build Work Zone and SAP BPA, SAP S/4HANA, and Ariba was easy to follow once all requirements were met. However, there is not much information, or at least the SAP Documentation is not easy to follow to set up the right landscape that meets all the requirements; this was the case with the IAS and IPS configuration, where we needed the support of BTP Architects.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Cognizant
No answers on this topic
SAP
  • Unattended Automation.
  • Attended automation.
  • Connecting to the backend SAP system (ECC or S/4).
  • Can also talk to non SAP world.
  • Doesn't require skills strictly pertaining to BPA. In fact, even a RPA developer can build logic.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
Cognizant
No answers on this topic
SAP
  • Reusability of components in sap build apps.
  • Limited development platform support.
  • Desktop agent not available for MAC OS.
  • Offline mode.
  • Accessibility feature.
Debanjana Sarkar | TrustRadius Reviewer
Debanjana Sarkar
Package Consultant
Read full review
Usability
Cognizant
No answers on this topic
SAP
The interface is very modern, web-based, no deep technical knowledge is required to use SAP Build Process Automation. It works with drag and drop, configuration and almost no coding is needed. Actually, we had to write code only for one specific small business logic. All the rest could be done in a no-code manner.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
Cognizant
No answers on this topic
SAP
There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.
VK
Virve Kiuru
Solution and Process Manager
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cognizant
No answers on this topic
SAP
Bubble.io is more user-friendly in comparison with SAP AppGyver. The latter being practically a free tool provides enough functionality to achieve results though while Bubble.io doesn't let you export your projects without a paid subscription. Bubble.io has great initial tour and tutorial integrated into the platform that can be handy for any new beginner while SAP AppGyver can be a little overwhelming.
Vinay Thoke | TrustRadius Reviewer
Vinay Thoke
Digital Design Director
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cognizant
No answers on this topic
SAP
  • Lower costs for development and automation
  • Very easy to use
  • Integrates existing applications with pre-built APIs, components, and templates for SAP and non-SAP applications
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Build Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Build Portfolio includes: 1- SAP Build Apps to create business application 2- SAP Build Process Automation to automate end to end business processes 3- SAP Build Work Zone to design and create business sites