IBM API Management vs. Layer7 Live API Creator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM API Management
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM API management enables creation and management of web application programming interfaces (API).N/A
Layer7 Live API Creator
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Layer7 Live API Creator (formerly CA Live API Creator) from Broadcom company CA Technologies helps create application back-ends for internal applications, mobile development projects, data-as-a-service exposure, Internet of Things (IoT) enablement and partner application integrations, and also create enterprise APIs from diverse data sources. It also allows the user to integrate data from both SQL and NoSQL data sources with fine-grained security and the flexibility to deploy and scale to…N/A
Pricing
IBM API ManagementLayer7 Live API Creator
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM API ManagementLayer7 Live API Creator
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM API ManagementLayer7 Live API Creator
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
IBM API ManagementLayer7 Live API Creator
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM API Management
8.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Layer7 Live API Creator
-
Ratings
API access control8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM API ManagementLayer7 Live API Creator
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM API ManagementLayer7 Live API Creator
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM API ManagementLayer7 Live API Creator
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
If you are truly using IBM API Management for an API gateway, you will be ok. if you start trying to build custom scripts to transform messages complex in nature, it will soon become unmanageable.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Pros
IBM
  • Import APIs - We have an existing inventory of APIs and services, so having an easy import process was required. IBM provides the ability to import Swagger so the process was quick and easy.
  • Service Offerings - Can create plans to control various model offerings for varying clients depending on the need. You are not locked into a tier structure and can customize if a need arises.
  • API Usage - visibility into the use of an API with a wealth of reporting information allows you to support an API from a production use to trending and forecasting any future growth.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Cons
IBM
  • Troubleshooting deployment pipeline - identifying issues with your api based on restrictions through a deployment pipeline is difficult. If a quality assurance environment is less stringent than a production environment, making sure your api is accessible and configured appropriately is tough.
  • Code level scripting is limited to javascript and xslt. so if any complex fanning needs to occur, you are limited in tooling.
  • Administration is more cumbersome than it needs to be. There are roles/profiles that are defined, but to use a group email for the approval or use of an api needs to managed better. A more thorough thought process needs to be defined - which I think IBM is tackling as an improvement.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
There are a lot of similarities between Apigee Edge and IBM API Management. Some of the differences at the time of this posting is... 1) IBM APIM/C integrates better with other products. Dynatrace is used to track API and service specifics with the ability to offload those statistics for operational reporting. 2) If you are evolving from DataPower, IBM API Management is a logical choice to support additional REST APIs. 3) Generating keys is simple. Integration of those keys with a secure data vault is easy as well for your consumer.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Centralizing on an API management platform was imperative. Being able to support SOAP UIs as well as REST APIs was required. Because of the tooling, service inventory and provisioning can be managed - regardless of the pricing and cost structures are used.
  • Constructing plans that provide tiering options based on rate limits help in onboarding new consumers. The lesser cost in onboarding through an API gateway outweighs the cost of modifying/configuring an API to handle multiple clients.
  • Defining guidance and onboarding practices while rolling out the product also helps in the adoption, reference architecture, and governance that can save your company money.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Layer7 Live API Creator Screenshots

Screenshot of Dramatically reduce or eliminate code with Reactive Logic