IBM Elastic Storage Server vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Elastic Storage Server
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Elastic Storage Server (IBM ESS) is a software-defined storage option.N/A
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Ceph Storage is a software defined storage option.N/A
Pricing
IBM Elastic Storage ServerRed Hat Ceph Storage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Elastic Storage ServerRed Hat Ceph Storage
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Elastic Storage ServerRed Hat Ceph Storage
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM Elastic Storage ServerRed Hat Ceph Storage
Small Businesses
StarWind Virtual SAN
StarWind Virtual SAN
Score 9.2 out of 10
StarWind Virtual SAN
StarWind Virtual SAN
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
StarWind Virtual SAN
StarWind Virtual SAN
Score 9.2 out of 10
StarWind Virtual SAN
StarWind Virtual SAN
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Spectrum Scale
IBM Spectrum Scale
Score 8.1 out of 10
IBM Spectrum Scale
IBM Spectrum Scale
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Elastic Storage ServerRed Hat Ceph Storage
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(3 ratings)
8.7
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Elastic Storage ServerRed Hat Ceph Storage
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Reliable data storage and access is a big challenge in AI applications and IBM ESS is a service you need to solve the problem. If you are building an AI service and you already use the IBM ecosystem for AI compute requirements, ESS can serve as an excellent software based storage solution. Integration with other platforms such as EMR/Databricks is still a challenge and should be improved.
Read full review
Red Hat
Large scale data storage: Red Hat Ceph Storage is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data. It's well suited for organizations that need to store and manage large amounts of data, such as backups, images, videos, and other types of multimedia content.Cloud-based deployments: Red Hat Ceph Storage can provide object storage services for cloud-based applications such as SaaS and PaaS offerings. It is well suited for organizations that are looking to build their own cloud storage infrastructure or to use it as a storage backend for their cloud-based applications.High-performance computing: Red Hat Ceph Storage can be used to provide storage for high-performance computing (HPC) applications, such as scientific simulations and other types of compute-intensive workloads. It's well suited for organizations that need to store
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Powerful processing power, literally support unlimited scale out storage capabilities
  • well integrated and supported with multi flavor environment and file systems.
  • Huge capacity with in a very reduced form factor of disks/enclosures
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Highly resilient, almost every time we attempted to destroy the cluster it was able to recover from a failure. It struggled to when the nodes where down to about 30%(3 replicas on 10 nodes)
  • The cache tiering feature of Ceph is especially nice. We attached solid state disks and assigned them as the cache tier. Our sio benchmarks beat the our Netapp when we benchmarked it years ago (no traffic, clean disks) by a very wide margin.
  • Ceph effectively allows the admin to control the entire stack from top to bottom instead of being tied to any one storage vendor. The cluster can be decentralized and replicated across data centers if necessary although we didn't try that feature ourselves, it gave us some ideas for a disaster recovery solution. We really liked the idea that since we control the hardware and the software, we have infinite upgradability with off the shelf parts which is exactly what it was built for.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Integration and configuration need a bit more technical expertise which is I guess expected.
  • There can be some improvement in integration with Legacy applications.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • GUI based mainetenence should be developed
  • Unable to detect storage latencies
  • VM to disk mapping should be visible so as to save some critical applications data in case of HDD failures
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
IBM ESS is optimized for AI and Big Data usecases while S3 is a general purpose storage solutions. EMR and Databricks have lakehouse/data warehousing solutions for distributed computing but are more optimized for just the big data pipelining solutions and not essentially for AI usecases, especially for inference, when you need to load model artifacts really quickly.
Read full review
Red Hat
MongoDB offers better search ability compared to Red Hat Ceph Storage but it’s more optimized for large number of object while Red Hat Ceph Storage is preferred if you need to store binary data or large individual objects. To get acceptable search functionality you really need to compile Red Hat Ceph Storage with another database where the search metadata related to Red Hat Ceph Storage objects are stored.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • When the cost and price dynamics comes into account, we have replaced age old traditional arrays with almost negligible cost with ESS
  • able to extend the capabilities of global teams to work and share their experiences and knowledge with other teams.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Ceph allows my customer to scale out very fast.
  • Ceph allows distributing storage objects through multiple server rooms.
  • Ceph is fault-taulerant, meaning the customer can lose a server room and would still be able to access the storage.
Read full review
ScreenShots