TestMu AI vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
TestMu AI
Score 8.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is a Full Stack Agentic AI Quality Engineering platform that uses end-to-end AI agents to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality. The platform enables testing of web, mobile, and enterprise applications at any scale across real devices, real browsers, and custom real-world environments.
$19
per month per user
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
Pricing
TestMu AISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Editions & Modules
Live
$19
per month Parallel Test
Real Device (Includes Live)
$35
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser Automation
$119
per month Parallel Test
Native App Automation
$149
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device
$158
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
$199
per month Parallel Test
SmartUI Visual Regression
$219
per month Parallel Test
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise
Custom Pricing
per parallel test
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
TestMu AISoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
TestMu AISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Best Alternatives
TestMu AISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
Enterprises
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
TestMu AISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(110 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(62 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
TestMu AISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
LambdaTest Inc.
One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
Read full review
SmartBear
Good for simple requests, simple scripts, assertions, and small workflows. Also not bad with the Open Source version if savvy with code as you can do a lot with custom functionality.Free version has limited compatibility with scripts/projects created from the Pro version, but functionality-wise can probably be made up with coding. As such, the free version may not be too suitable for complex scripts or for those who are not familiar with coding as functionality/usability may be limited.
Read full review
Pros
LambdaTest Inc.
  • Very accessible as multiple users can be added in each subscription
  • Very reliable as it is very close to the actual device when it comes to operating system and version behavior
  • There are a lot of options for devices and browsers that users can choose from when it comes to emulating and testing
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Ease of implementation
  • Ease of use
  • User friendly interface
Read full review
Cons
LambdaTest Inc.
  • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
  • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
  • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
Read full review
SmartBear
  • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
LambdaTest Inc.
The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Usability
LambdaTest Inc.
Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
LambdaTest Inc.
yes always available
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Performance
LambdaTest Inc.
haven't found any glitch while using this
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
LambdaTest Inc.
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
LambdaTest Inc.
Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
LambdaTest Inc.
While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
Read full review
SmartBear
Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. For Rest API, I think that Postman is a little above SoapUI, but not too far away.
Read full review
Scalability
LambdaTest Inc.
not all department, but we're using for our clients
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
LambdaTest Inc.
  • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
  • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
  • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
  • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
  • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

TestMu AI Screenshots

Screenshot of an automated screenshotScreenshot of mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of some of the available integrations.Screenshot of real-time testingScreenshot of responsive testing