LambdaTest vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LambdaTest
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
LambdaTest is a cloud-based platform that helps users run manual and automation tests of their website and mobile apps. Users can test their native mobile application (Android and iOS) and mobile websites on Real Devices on cloud or choose from emulators & simulators for a multitude of configurations.
$15
per month per user
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
Pricing
LambdaTestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Editions & Modules
Lifetime Free
$0
1 Concurrent session Per Month
Live
15/Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Real Device (Includes Live)
25/ Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web Automation
$79/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser Automation
$99/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Native App Automation
$125/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device
$128/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
$159/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise
CUSTOM PRICING
Parallel Test
Enterprise
CUSTOM PRICING
Parallel Test
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LambdaTestSoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFor Enterprises Customize plans. Please contact our Chat Support or drop us email at support@lambdatest.com
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LambdaTestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
LambdaTestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.7 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Selenium
Selenium
Score 8.3 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Selenium
Selenium
Score 8.3 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LambdaTestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(58 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LambdaTestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
LambdaTest, Inc.
LambdaTest is very well suited for cross-device testing as they provide a wide array of options to choose from. It is very reliable and mimics the actual device. In scenarios wherein the user is having an urgent issue and needs to emulate the bug, the app sometimes is quite slow and may hinder from having a very efficient testing.
Read full review
SmartBear
Good for simple requests, simple scripts, assertions, and small workflows. Also not bad with the Open Source version if savvy with code as you can do a lot with custom functionality.Free version has limited compatibility with scripts/projects created from the Pro version, but functionality-wise can probably be made up with coding. As such, the free version may not be too suitable for complex scripts or for those who are not familiar with coding as functionality/usability may be limited.
Read full review
Pros
LambdaTest, Inc.
  • Offers geolocation testing in automation which is amazing!
  • You can select browsers, timezone, country and run the capability to start testing instantly.
  • We could scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost.
  • Integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our test cycle easier
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Ease of implementation
  • Ease of use
  • User friendly interface
Read full review
Cons
LambdaTest, Inc.
  • Sometimes the live apps gets slow so its better that this doesn't happen more often
  • Still room to add more device vendors like, Huawei now doesn't support play services so its better thay we also have some devices which are with Huawei services only
Read full review
SmartBear
  • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
LambdaTest, Inc.
It is very reliable and can provide great results for all the stakeholders. Access is very quick and there are wide-array of devices that can be used to provide a robust application. Having limited resources on a remote setup really helps users to complete task with this emulator. This helps a lot in development team.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Usability
LambdaTest, Inc.
LambdaTest provides video recording and screenshots of all your tests in their test logs, which makes tracking easier. Test statuses, such as Lambda Error and VM allocation, allowed us to quickly troubleshoot any build that failed while executing. So overall, it's been great to use for our Tester and Developer team.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
LambdaTest, Inc.
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
LambdaTest, Inc.
Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
LambdaTest, Inc.
LambdaTest offers me a large number of real-time mobile devices and browsers for testing, as well as debugging tools like Screenshot Testing and Issue Tracker. This is what I like the most about LambdaTest and prefer it over Sauce Labs. Additionally, my team has reported faster testing speeds with LambdaTest compared to SauceLabs
Read full review
SmartBear
Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. For Rest API, I think that Postman is a little above SoapUI, but not too far away.
Read full review
Return on Investment
LambdaTest, Inc.
  • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
  • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
  • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
  • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
  • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

LambdaTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Automated ScreenshotScreenshot of mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of Automation Testing on LambdatestScreenshot of Integrate with your favorite toolsScreenshot of Real-Time TestingScreenshot of Responsive Testing