Oracle JD Edwards World vs. Xactly Commission Expense Accounting

The payables module is great, easy access to what we owe and what we have paid to vendors. The flipside to this is the amount of invoices we have on certain accounts that we can't always access. The financial reports come out nicely and are easy to view, the easy accessibility to our users country-wide is nice.

Incentivized

CEA is well suited for small and rapidly growing companies where manually calculating commissions expense for ASC606 is not an option due to a lack of internal resources. CEA is less appropriate for larger companies that have the resources and likely a person, or people, who only focus on commissions.

Incentivized

• It is very strong for reporting. Any business data can be generated in the form of reports. Automation can be achieved to send notifications to users by email.
• From an implementation point of view the time spent in developing and implementing a new process is reduced and easy.
• There is a huge flexibility to customize it as per you business needs.

Incentivized

• Amortization waterfalls
• Locked periods & PPA adjustments
• Journal entries

Incentivized

• One issue is the number of records I can access, wish it was more
• We have large vendors with thousands of invoices, and I can't always get to them due to size.
• Sometimes hard to change reports.

Incentivized

• Dashboard is on a different page
• Needing to rerun reports
• Not being able to download reports and edit them

Incentivized

Go into implementation knowing how you will handle churn, if there are claw backs, treatment for every type of commission payment (i.e. new business, renewals, etc.) and know your average customer life. You'll also want details by customer for as far back as you can go (within reason).

Incentivized

No other products.

Incentivized

We selected Xactly CEA for ASC 606.

Incentivized

• It's amazing for managing your business

Incentivized

• Efficiency
• Centralized
• Accurate

Incentivized