Panda Systems Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Panda Systems Management
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Panda Security now offers system monitoring, client-less device management, patch management, and other capabilities via Panda Systems Management.N/A
PRTG
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
PRTG Network Monitor is the flagship offering from German software company Paessler, for monitoring local and wide area networks (LANs & WANs), servers, websites, apps, and more.
$2,149
per year
Pricing
Panda Systems ManagementPRTG Network Monitor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
PRTG 500
$2,149
per year
Hosted 500
$2,149
per year
PRTG 1,000
$3,899
per year
Hosted 1000
$3,899
per year
PRTG 2,500
$8,099
per year
Hosted 2500
$8,099
per year
PRTG 5,000
$14,199
per year
Hosted 5000
$14,199
per year
PRTG 10000
$17,899
per year
PRTG Enterprise
Custom Pricing
subscription license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Panda Systems ManagementPRTG
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Panda Systems ManagementPRTG Network Monitor
Features
Panda Systems ManagementPRTG Network Monitor
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Panda Systems Management
9.0
1 Ratings
23% above category average
PRTG Network Monitor
-
Ratings
Virtualization monitoring9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Panda Systems Management
9.1
3 Ratings
21% above category average
PRTG Network Monitor
-
Ratings
Remote monitoring10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Network device monitoring10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Activity Monitoring10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Panda Systems Management
9.4
3 Ratings
27% above category average
PRTG Network Monitor
-
Ratings
Patch Management10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based automation10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Remote Access
Comparison of Remote Access features of Product A and Product B
Panda Systems Management
9.4
1 Ratings
35% above category average
PRTG Network Monitor
-
Ratings
Attended device access10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Unattended device access9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile device access9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtual device access10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple concurrent sessions9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Performance Monitoring
Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Panda Systems Management
-
Ratings
PRTG Network Monitor
7.7
66 Ratings
4% below category average
Automated network device discovery00 Ratings7.859 Ratings
Network monitoring00 Ratings9.565 Ratings
Baseline threshold calculation00 Ratings7.756 Ratings
Alerts00 Ratings8.866 Ratings
Network capacity planning00 Ratings6.347 Ratings
Packet capture analysis00 Ratings6.933 Ratings
Network mapping00 Ratings6.546 Ratings
Customizable reports00 Ratings6.856 Ratings
Wireless infrastructure monitoring00 Ratings7.548 Ratings
Hardware health monitoring00 Ratings9.063 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Panda Systems ManagementPRTG Network Monitor
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.4 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.4 out of 10
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
TeamViewer
TeamViewer
Score 8.5 out of 10
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Panda Systems ManagementPRTG Network Monitor
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(3 ratings)
8.7
(66 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(18 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Panda Systems ManagementPRTG Network Monitor
Likelihood to Recommend
WatchGuard Technologies
Panda Systems Management is well suited for small to medium sized organizations looking for a tool to centralize asset management not only physical but also assist with rapid deployment of patches, applications, etc. It proves also to be very beneficial as permits (to and extent) to do troubleshooting without interfering or interrupting end users.
Read full review
Paessler
integrates seamlessly with Windows servers via WMI and PowerShell, providing deep insights into resource usage, performance metrics, and system health. It's excellent at tracking CPU, memory, disk space, and event logs, enabling rapid troubleshooting and proactive maintenance. PRTG Network Monitor also effectively monitors Fortigate devices, providing detailed data on firewall health, traffic patterns, bandwidth utilization, VPN status, and security alerts. This visibility helps detect and resolve network security issues promptly.
Read full review
Pros
WatchGuard Technologies
  • Remote access. It's as good as any other on the market. It also allows for RDP connections which is a nice feature.
  • Inventory management. We get some great insight from the reports we can run.
  • Quick Jobs. If there's an app or service you use, there may be a quick job to install and update it remotely.
Read full review
Paessler
  • Switch monitoring and finding out if there are communication issues or throughput alerts are reached
  • Big picture view of the whole infrastructure and what is functioning and what is not
  • Uptime tracking is great and lets us know for how long a device is down or overall uptime
Read full review
Cons
WatchGuard Technologies
  • Licensing. With the possibility of monthly splitting
  • Integration with firewalls even outside the corporate network
Read full review
Paessler
  • Licensing on a per entity basis can be cumbersome for devices which have a ton of monitoring points like network switches\routers. Each sensor may count against a license, which could be a lot of you were monitoring every TX\RX of an SFP for example
  • A better method to easily template\copy monitors across devices
  • The navigation in the web GUI could be a little more straightforward in terms of the hierarchy
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
WatchGuard Technologies
No answers on this topic
Paessler
I would renew it because the platform has brought us many technical and economic benefits that make the cost-benefit ratio very good. Additionally, to do so does not require large investments in training, licensing or infrastructure, and at the administration level, extensive knowledge is not required to be able to bear it.
Read full review
Usability
WatchGuard Technologies
No answers on this topic
Paessler
The tool is very intuitive to use and it is Windows-based (everybody knows how to use Windows) so it's easy to get into. Every time is setup in a hierarchy so if you have a good initial hierarchy design, it will really reduce administrative effort down the road.
Read full review
Support Rating
WatchGuard Technologies
We rate and recommend Panda Systems Management not only because it is a very effective and very cost effective solution that pays itself for us (ROI) extremely fast, but also due to all reason described previously and possibly a few more I'm sure we missed here. I do have to says tech support for this solution sometimes leave a bit to be desired.
Read full review
Paessler
PRTG does everything we need it to do and more. Ease of use, ease of management and maintenance and clarity of monitoring of hundreds of different types of device and service gives this a large advantage over other products on the market that I have tried. I would definitely recommend it to anyone who needs a network monitoring product in their environment and even to people who don't know they need a solution yet!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
WatchGuard Technologies
No answers on this topic
Paessler
It's very important that de project's teams have different member of the TI. We have learned too late the importa of Security Analyst at the design architecture moment. We have to rebuild part of the implementation for made this big mistake.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
WatchGuard Technologies
Panda is a bit of a greatest hits between some of these other things. I feel like GoToAssist has a stronger remote support option, but Panda is more convenient. Kaseya has a ton of features, but from an ease of use standpoint, Panda seems stronger. Spiceworks has a fine inventory system but it lacks features. I added Azure as well since we are a 365 shop and Azure supplies a lot of the same visibility that Panda does. However it is a completely different animal, and it's way easier to hop into Panda and get what you need than get waaay more data than necessary from Azure/Azure AD/ATP.
Read full review
Paessler
PRTG offers more versatility in monitoring when compared to the other solutions we tested. The other solutions were also limited as far as customization options, which made them less adaptable to our networks. When compared to Auvik, for instance, we prefer PRTG as it offers immediate notifications through the desktop client - not limited to email notifications as with Auvik. We also appreciate the fact that PRTG can be self/on-prem hosted vs Auvik's cloud model. This makes for an easier deployment and less firewall adjustments to allow traffic to cloud-hosted solutions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
WatchGuard Technologies
  • It has facilitated us in the management of controls on the various clients, reducing the cost of human resources
  • Thanks to the alerts, in case of intrusion, it is possible to intervene promptly
Read full review
Paessler
  • The ability to analyze multiple pieces of information in one place, especially with historical data, has saved our IT department time and headaches. It would be so much more difficult to trace an issue without PRTG, just relying on event logs and an open task manager window.
  • The cost is not cheap, so it's an expense that hits the bottom line like everything else. Figure in hardware costs as well, ideally a server outside of your main environment.
  • I keep saying this, but the historical data piece is worth so much. There's really no good way to collect all of that information in one place without something like PRTG. And that definitely saves time and money in the long run.
Read full review
ScreenShots