Salmon Treasurer vs. SAP Treasury and Risk Management

SAP Risk and Treaury is well suited for corporate industrial use. SAP has accumulted industrial experience of cash management and worth of the 100% money invested cause this fact reduces your time to get ERP treasury project launched as full functional. Needs more customised solution if applied to banks treasury (money market instruments focus, different accounting plan, internal risk management rules). Pricing is the main limitation: available for mostly large corporate and well financed projects but worth every dime spend on it

• Trading platform integration and deal processing
• Market data integration
• Market and credit risk management
• Regulatory reporting
• (Hedge) Accounting for financial instruments

Incentivized

• It would be nice if all reports could have the same recurrence options (some reports allow for the date range to be the last full month while others require a specific date range).
• It is difficult to discontinue some recurring reports that are no longer used.

Incentivized

Customer gets on hold all projects till end of the 2Q 2023. Only support tasks are given.

Some of the edges I have found are [the] following: Risk universe building support and navigation, Transactions back to back stacking and control on [the] roll out if your logic, Integration with risk and compliance dashboard, ease of customizing reporting dashboards both from the perspectives of treasury transactions along with risk Profiling and risk reporting.

Incentivized

• You can see your Loses from each one of your states
• Simulate the process accordingly different data, that way we can avoid taking risk
• Consolidated information on one place

Incentivized