Zephyr Enterprise vs. TestRail

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Zephyr Enterprise
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Zephyr Enterprise provides optimization, quality, speed, and processing of testing activities in a single tool. Other features include creating test cases, defining user requirements and generating reports.N/A
TestRail
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.N/A
Pricing
Zephyr EnterpriseTestRail
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Zephyr EnterpriseTestRail
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Zephyr EnterpriseTestRail
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Zephyr EnterpriseTestRail
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Zephyr Enterprise
9.3
1 Ratings
14% above category average
TestRail
7.0
1 Ratings
14% below category average
Centralized test management9.01 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories9.01 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting9.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Defect management10.01 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Zephyr EnterpriseTestRail
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Zephyr EnterpriseTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Zephyr EnterpriseTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
SmartBear
  1. Well suited for companies having several applications which need rigorous continuous testing cycles due to periodic upgrades to products/features.
  2. Ideally suited for use cases where there is a need to run sanity and regression suites very frequently.
  3. It is very helpful to have a traceability matrix across Stories/tasks and easy to link all the test cases to be covered to stories.
  4. Variety of reports for Quality Dashboard.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
The integration with other tools, and their user friendly layout and design. It's very comfortable to use and is way better than other tools with the Automation Testing tools, thanks to the great API that is included. Sometimes the integration with Jira is a little faulty, but the links to that tool usually work well. It could be cool if it had a better following for the bug items that were registered on other tools.
Read full review
Pros
SmartBear
  • Creation of Folders, Sub Folder and Releases for various Teams/Projects
  • Ability to create cycles and adding cases to these
  • Ability to copy/clone entire test cycles for regression/sanity needs
  • Linking of defects to Test Cases
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • Beautiful and productive UI.
  • Nice filtering system allowing me to find what I need quickly.
Read full review
Cons
SmartBear
  • Better Test case Upload Utility
  • Ability to quickly map test cases from excel to JIRA fields
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • Integration with Jira seems [a] little faulty.
  • Increase the API call limit for different editions.
  • Better way to trigger automation suites from TestRail.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SmartBear
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd.
Read full review
Return on Investment
SmartBear
  • Time saving and productivity enhancement for QA teams by preventing context and tool switching
  • High observability to management via QA Dashboards
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • Improved test management process and collaboration inside team.
  • Increased transparency of QA work.
  • Team became more satisfied.
Read full review
ScreenShots