Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Sakai

Sakai

Overview

What is Sakai?

Sakai is an open source learning management system provided by the Apero Foundation. The LMS provides what it calls Core and Expanded Features. The Core Features encompass an integrated tool set that is tested by the Sakai community members and is then included with…

Read more
Recent Reviews

Sakai = Success

10 out of 10
September 15, 2015
Incentivized
We use Sakai as our LMS for the university. It is used for the entire university. It helps guide the day to day student/ instructor …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Popular Features

View all 11 features
  • Learning content (5)
    8.0
    80%
  • Course authoring (5)
    8.0
    80%
  • Progress tracking & certifications (5)
    8.0
    80%
  • Mobile friendly (5)
    7.0
    70%
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is Sakai?

Sakai is an open source learning management system provided by the Apero Foundation. The LMS provides what it calls Core and Expanded Features. The Core Features encompass an integrated tool set that is tested by the Sakai community members and is then included with each new release. The tool set…

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

25 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is ProProfs LMS Software?

ProProfs LMS is a learning management system software that is designed to help instructors create and deliver online training courses. The LMS offers both businesses and educational institutions comprehensive training solutions by allowing them to create online courses, complemented by tests,…

What is Nearpod?

Nearpod is an education-focused learning management software solution offered by Nearpod.

Return to navigation

Product Demos

DEMO 002 Download Course Materials from Sakai LMS

YouTube

DEMO 001 Submitting Assignments on Sakai LMS

YouTube

Demo Suku Sakai di Depan Kantor Gubernur Riau

YouTube

pompa dc sakai demo produk

YouTube

Sakai (2006): IMS Common Cartridge Demonstration

YouTube

Richmond Sakai White #2 Deba 180mm Quick Look 30P

YouTube
Return to navigation

Features

Learning Management

Features of LMS and LCMS systems, related to designing, administering, and consuming learning content in an educational, corporate, or on-the-job context.

7.9
Avg 8.2
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Sakai?

Sakai is an open source learning management system provided by the Apero Foundation. The LMS provides what it calls Core and Expanded Features. The Core Features encompass an integrated tool set that is tested by the Sakai community members and is then included with each new release. The tool set can be configured by: instructors, students, research investigators and project leaders. The other set of tools, known as “Contrib Tools” are specific to Sakai tools and innovations that are developed and tested by community members and are then made available for others to use outside of the packaged Sakai product releases.

Sakai Video

Introducing Sakai 11

Sakai Integrations

Sakai Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(22)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

Users recommend exploring Sakai thoroughly and spending time on it to discover its useful functions. They suggest attending Sakai community events and talking to other institutions using the platform to learn more about its pros and cons.

Users advise knowing the customization limitations of Sakai and coming up with creative solutions to make it suit your class or project's needs. They recommend testing Sakai with real courses and faculty before switching to ensure it meets user requirements.

Users suggest integrating Sakai with other tools like Piazza for additional functionality and comparing Sakai to other services with better support. They recommend considering alternatives and choosing the system that best suits your needs.

Overall, users emphasize the need for thorough exploration, customization, testing, and consideration of alternatives when using Sakai.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-5 of 5)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Sarah Daggett | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Sakai is used by our university to both teach classes and to organize/deliver committee materials. Sakai's use by faculty varies by preference; some use it heavily, others don't use it all. It could be used to augment a fully F2F class or can be used to deliver a fully online class. For committees, they use the folders to keep track of past documents and, paired with alerts, to let committee members know when new, significant documents have been added.
  • Sakai is pretty flexible. Within its framework, you can create whatever kind of folder structure you want/need and can turn on or off options easily.
  • Sakai is fairly simple/straightforward in design. I haven't heard many issues from students in using it.
  • I would say Sakai is OK to navigate through. Depending on how many folders you have and how deep they go, it's nice to be able to click back on a root folder, but I also find their navigation a little clunky.
  • Sakai doesn't fully integrate with our SIS. Consequently, faculty will call us saying a student is still on their roster in Sakai when the student actually dropped. This means the faculty member needs to manage their own Sakai roster. Students will be added to the roster automatically, but not dropped.
  • This may not be a Sakai problem, but faculty seem to get really confused about how Sakai relates to our SIS. We've had faculty tell students their grades were "posted," only to find out they just meant they were updated in the Gradebook of Sakai. They hadn't actually posted the grades in our SIS. We've tried to explain this a variety of ways, but there's something about Sakai that makes them think that somehow it's part of our SIS - when they look totally different!
  • Sakai's navigation can be flat/clunky. They rely on a root navigation system like Windows Explorer that kind of works, but also can be frustrating, depending on how meandering the documents/files for a class goes. The menu on the left is straightforward, though, and can be customized, which is very nice.
I've used Sakai to supplement my Public Speaking class. Public Speaking is very much a F2F type course, so I didn't use Sakai much for course content delivery. However, I did use it to post my syllabus, post my lecture slides, communicate any class announcements, and to conduct a final exam for the class. Building the final exam was very simple and I was easily able to swap out questions to vary it from term to term.

Before I was a staff member and lecturer, I used Sakai as a student. My instructor used Sakai to varying degrees. I really appreciated it being the one-stop-receptacle for all-things class related. If I somehow lost an assignment instruction sheet, I could rely on it being posted there. For multimedia work it was lacking, at that time, but I know Sakai has been updated over time and I hope that part of it has improved.

If I was ever frustrated by Sakai, it was because faculty used it in a piecemeal way. It's fine not to want to use the gradebook, but don't enter some grades and not others. It's wonderful to upload class documents to it; but don't do some and not others. Whatever way you're going to use Sakai, commit to it and use it well. Your students will thank you.
Learning Management (11)
79.0909090909091%
7.9
Course authoring
80%
8.0
Course catalog or library
70%
7.0
Player/Portal
80%
8.0
Learning content
80%
8.0
Mobile friendly
70%
7.0
Progress tracking & certifications
80%
8.0
Assignments
100%
10.0
Compliance management
70%
7.0
Learning administration
90%
9.0
Learning reporting & analytics
60%
6.0
Social learning
90%
9.0
  • Sakai has supported the institution in providing a platform for offering more hybrid/blended and online course options.
  • Sakai has given students a "third space" where they can communicate with the instructor and their classmates about course content.
Before using Sakai, we used Blackboard. Ultimately, I think moving to Sakai was a financial decision (it was cheaper), but I believe it ended up being better accepted by faculty and students as well. At the time (this was several years ago), Blackboard's UI wasn't as user-friendly and there were issues with administrating it. I don't think most of campus used it, actually. We changed to Sakai and haven't looked back.
Jason Smith, DPA | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Sakai is being used as an LMS at Pomona College as well as the Claremont University Consortium which includes four other undergraduate colleges and one graduate institution. The business problem that it addresses is that of providing learning materials to students, creating interactive and collaborative environments for students, faculty, and staff, as well a number of additional instructional activities.
  • The Sakai product is "REAL" open source project that is part of the Apereo Foundation. It is the only LMS on the market where students, faculty, and staff can have a say on how Sakai evolves. It is a responsive and vibrant community based product.
  • Sakai is technically rock solid, scalable, and robust.
  • The possibilities of Sakai are endless with LTI (Learning Tools Integration).
  • Sakai is highly customizable, configurable, and can be automated easily where other LMS's can not, especially those hosted in the cloud.
  • Sakai has a bit of improvement to do in standardizing some of its tools.
  • There is the perception that Sakai is hard to install and administer, this needs to be worked on.
  • Built in video conference functionality would be excellent for Sakai.
  • Sakai needs to handle rich media types better.
The Sakai LMS is very well suited for any organization that requires a rock solid LMS that can be customized to meet specific needs of an organization. Sakai is a "TRUE" open source project with a genuine roadmap for the future. It is not constrained by profit motives or a vendors bottom line. Rather it is a community LMS where users actually have input; it is an innovative governance modal for enterprise software.
Learning Management (11)
92.72727272727273%
9.3
Course authoring
90%
9.0
Course catalog or library
90%
9.0
Player/Portal
90%
9.0
Learning content
100%
10.0
Mobile friendly
100%
10.0
Progress tracking & certifications
80%
8.0
Assignments
100%
10.0
Compliance management
100%
10.0
Learning administration
100%
10.0
Learning reporting & analytics
90%
9.0
Social learning
80%
8.0
  • The ability to self host and customize Sakai has led to greater efficiencies and reliability.
  • In all Sakai's cost of ownership is much less than dealing with an ASP and/or cloud solution.
  • Sakai is continuing to improve over the years. Innovation is always happening.
Every few years we evaluate LMSs. Each time Sakai comes out ahead due to cost, customizations, and the Sakai community. We like to keep things in house because it allows us an extra amount of reliability and control that you will have to give up when running most other solutions. Sakai is an LMS that is here for the long run. They can not be purchased by anyone and it does not look like it will go away any time in the intermediate future. There is much stability in Sakai.
Sakai is a "real" OpenSource software and with that comes a wonderful community of developers and users that offer fantastic support across all levels. Additionally if paid commercial support is a requirement for your organization there are options such as Longsite and others. The documentation and open nature of the Sakai community is like no other, laziness and lack of initiative are the only things that would hold one back from solving a problem.
6500
Sakai is used in the context of higher education. We host courses across 5 undergraduate institutions and about 2600 courses each semester. Over the decade of use we have hosted over 65,000 course and project sites. Sakai has been very economical and the development community is the best. It is one of the few LMS projects out there that continues to evolve.
1
We have one full time person who supports Sakai at the system administration level. Also, there are about six other people who use about 5-15% of their time offering support to Sakai users. These support people are instructional technologists who must be familiar with Sakai from an advanced user perspective.
  • Provide a digital / online course management system.
  • Provide a project based platform that can be used beyond that of the semester frame time.
  • Sakai provides and works as an academic repository of sorts.
  • Because we keep instructors courses available for about 7 years, hot online, it is like an academic repository.
  • Sakai has project sites. These are fantastic collaborative workspaces.
  • We share our installation across 6 institutions and use a single logon and it works!
  • I think that it will be used to server more media type content.
  • Social networking and co-curricular things are likely to increase.
  • Hey, its an LMS, and it is the best of them.
In terms of LMS software Sakai has been around since the beginning and it plays a huge roll in where LMSs are going it to the future. When considering Sakai, don't look at the number of institutions, rather look at the quality of them and how long they have been using Sakai. When you do this you will understand just how good of a piece of Software Sakai is. Long live Sakai!
Score 4 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Sakai is currently the Learning Management System (LMS) across campus. It is used for all learning management needs and is the hub for third-party plugins.
  • Open-source community.
  • Flexible.
  • As customizable as you can afford.
  • No mobile app.
  • Confusing and unintuitive layout and buried settings.
  • Lacking full 3rd-party integrations.
Sakai is great if you need a less expensive LMS. You will likely need to have internal developers or pay developers to keep it running, but this might be cheaper than the alternatives, like Blackboard, Canvas, D2L etc.
Adopting Sakai now would be a very risky proposition, as their user base continues to be eaten by Canvas. Open source is great when there is a thriving and growing community to support it, but the largest public institutions that used and developed for Sakai have been leaving in droves, causing development to stagnate.
Learning Management (11)
41.81818181818181%
4.2
Course authoring
70%
7.0
Course catalog or library
N/A
N/A
Player/Portal
N/A
N/A
Learning content
80%
8.0
Mobile friendly
30%
3.0
Progress tracking & certifications
60%
6.0
Assignments
70%
7.0
Compliance management
N/A
N/A
Learning administration
80%
8.0
Learning reporting & analytics
70%
7.0
Social learning
N/A
N/A
  • Sakai continues to serve the university, and faculty and students are mostly satisfied with it.
  • The cost to support has been good in the past.
  • As the market share slows, it's often the last to be developed by popular third-party integrations.
  • Canvas
Sakai will check most of the same boxes as Canvas as far as features. Students can receive feedback, emails, comments, grade and submit assignments, etc. However, everything is going to be a bit more difficult with Sakai. Finding something will take more clicks. Sakai is more flexible since it's open-source. If there's a feature you really need, you can develop it yourself (at your own risk). Integrations with third parties are much easier and faster with Canvas than Sakai.
Since Sakai is open-source their documentation is often lacking and support is absolutely needed onsite. Internal documentation is more important with Sakai than other services. The Sakai community is fun, passionate, engaged, and absolutely doing their best, but it's an uphill battle against the current market and trends.
Chani Loeb | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Both the school I was in from 2011 - 2015, which was Michigan Jewish Institute located in Detroit, MI, as well as the school that I am going to be in from 2017 - 2020, which is the University of Baltimore located in Baltimore, MD, use Sakai. Courses are organized into tabs. Teachers use the program to communicate and organize grades, assignments, tests, discussions, syllabi, and files with students.
  • Sakai allows teachers to send messages to students and a checkbox, when checked, will forward the message to students so that they will get the message even if they don't check Sakai.
  • Students can use Sakai to find students that they may wish to contact through each course's messages tab. There is an option to email every student or you can search through a list of the student's name in each course tab if you can't remember their name, but you don't want to email the entire class.
  • Sakai makes it easy for students to keep track of when assignments that teachers have uploaded are due in the assignments tab, as well as keep track of their grades in the grades tab and the progress of the course in the syllabus tab.
  • While the check box to send an email when you send a message is helpful, there have been times that teachers forgot to check that box, so students didn't get important assignments/announcements.
  • Discussion forums can be fun, but it's annoying to read other people's comments since you have to click into each person's comment, & it always marks the comments as new, even if you've read them.
  • I think it would be helpful if Sakai warned you before submitting an assignment how many submissions or when the assignment is due, before hitting submit.
It is a good organization tool for schools and possibly businesses. When a company or educational system wishes to convey & allocate assignments, Sakai is a good resource tool for creating a calendar, monitoring progress, sending feedback, having ongoing communication, & sharing information with students, teachers, colleagues, & management.
Learning Management (11)
52.72727272727273%
5.3
Course authoring
50%
5.0
Course catalog or library
80%
8.0
Player/Portal
N/A
N/A
Learning content
80%
8.0
Mobile friendly
30%
3.0
Progress tracking & certifications
80%
8.0
Assignments
80%
8.0
Compliance management
50%
5.0
Learning administration
50%
5.0
Learning reporting & analytics
30%
3.0
Social learning
50%
5.0
  • Sakai makes it easy for students to monitor grades which puts their minds at ease.
  • Sakai makes it easy for teachers to assign and receive assignments from students.
  • Communication is one of the most important and one of the most taxing parts of an educational system. Sakai makes this process just a little bit easier.
Courses are organized into tabs. Teachers use the program to list assignments with due dates for students in each course. Students use the program to upload assignments before they are due. Teachers upload syllabi along which the students can follow the progress of the semester. Teachers return assignments with grades and feedback. Grades are organized with weights/percentages for students to keep track of their progress in a course. Students use the program to contact their fellow classmates or teachers through messages on Sakai, or emails that are sent to their school account. When a teacher wants to send a message in Sakai, they can also check the email check box so that the students will receive the message in their school email in case they don't check Sakai. Teachers can upload files for students to use, such as PowerPoint Presentations or PDFs. Teachers can create discussion forums for students to communicate about class discussions. Teachers can create tests and quizzes in Sakai for students. Sakai is easy to use, whereas I personally have no idea how to use Blackboard because no educational system that I have been involved with has used it.
Dave Eveland | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Sakai as an LMS is used across our organization. This includes all of our programs at all levels: from our fully online PhD program all the way down to individual courses taught in face to face contexts by our full-time and adjunct faculty instructors. Sakai provides course sites for every course based on the information provided in our student information system. While most of the use is for organizing and running courses, some departments use it to organize and hold meetings, store department-level documentation and to distribute and archive important communications.

Providing a means of organizing course materials and documenting learning is a huge task for any institution or entity tasked with providing training or education to it's constituents, and Sakai does this. With assistance from instructional design professionals, course sites in Sakai become a place where student learning is documented, facilitated and archived - often for review by auditing entities for quality and adherence to industry level standards.
  • Sakai is flexible, providing a way for our customers (instructors) to customize their courses while staying in line with consistency and continuity of course design. This has allowed our courses to be far less cookie-cutter and stale. This is mostly accomplished through Sakai's LTI functionality and it's Lessons tool. This is particularly notable because not every course is the same, nor should it be. Our faculty and course developers can draw from OER resources, course text publisher assessment quiz banks and pull in content from sources from our library databases and services like YouTube.
  • Sakai is customizable, allowing us to pair it with our student information system to automatically create and track with student registration data - including adding new students and removing students who have elected to drop a course. The customization features also include being able to create course templates for individual schools or courses using specific tools or sequences of tools as well as a way to personalize content for students when they engage with each lesson.
  • Sakai is stable in the market. We have been using Sakai for almost 10 years and continue to see it improve; responding to changing trends in browser technologies, mobile platforms and accessibility requirements. Multiple programs offered over the years have been recognized by outside organizations like BestColleges.com for our programs and given high marks by students taking the courses offered in Sakai.
  • Sakai allows our faculty to inform it's continued evolution. We work closely with the developers, having a front seat to how things can work and function for our faculty. There have been multiple occasions where faculty ask, "Can Sakai do this?" and the answer is never "No."
  • Sakai's assessment feature could be improved, streamlining and making the assessment function much more simplified. Assessment in any electronic format is complex, but the workflows dealing with assessment import, creation and management of assessment data could be improved or made to be more consistent. It is confusing, for example, that assessments are split between a "working" state and a "published" state.
  • The gradebook or grade reporting feature in Sakai is somewhat clunky to use. While it does boast a spreadsheet look, feel and function, doing so in a browser window with multiple items and hundreds of students makes grading even for TAs difficult. Some of our instructors leverage the Classic gradebook instead of the newer interface because the view or function is more to their liking.
  • Discussion forums or how conversations are managed can be a bit confusing with Sakai. Sakai provides multiple ways in which discussions can be organized - some of which are for large groups of students and some which are more confusing. The discussions area doesn't allow students to share images easily, to up 'vote' or 'recommend' certain posts or sections to peers. There's no way to badge or otherwise highlight certain levels of 'attainment' for students in discussions. It's also difficult to assign grades to discussions.
Sakai is well suited for any size institution or training organization looking to use an extremely flexible, well-supported and extensible LMS that doesn't sacrifice budget for useless options and extra features. The community that is Sakai (by way of students, instructors, teachers, administrators, information technology professionals, instructional designers and developers) all make Sakai what it is. Sakai can be paired with multiple LTI tools, streaming services, conferencing and plagiarism detection platforms and student information systems to ultimately help students meet with success. As we have a very limited IT staff Sakai is hosted off-site, but are still able to provide support to our faculty with very little extra effort. While Sakai is not as well-known as platforms like Blackboard or Canvas, because we're one of just a few clients, requests to our host for second or third tier assistance are resolved pretty quickly. We recently had an instance where all of our users were unable to login; this turned out to be an issue with host configuration rather than Sakai itself. Sakai is not perfect: "Auto-saved draft" text disappears sometimes, question pools are difficult to share among faculty, the forums interface could be modernized and progress analytics surfaced more easily to students.
Learning Management (11)
71.81818181818181%
7.2
Course authoring
100%
10.0
Course catalog or library
50%
5.0
Player/Portal
N/A
N/A
Learning content
70%
7.0
Mobile friendly
70%
7.0
Progress tracking & certifications
70%
7.0
Assignments
100%
10.0
Compliance management
60%
6.0
Learning administration
90%
9.0
Learning reporting & analytics
100%
10.0
Social learning
80%
8.0
  • Sakai provided an alternative to other platforms that would have delayed the delivery of courses and full programs. Specific directives and initiatives were brought to bear from C level executives requiring delivery on an extremely tight budget. We have since been able to launch multiple programs, expand campuses and offer courses on a global scale.
  • Using Sakai has meant students familiar with other platforms have had to learn how interacting with Sakai while similar, is different. We have needed to invest in creating instructional materials about the platform, provide training and instructional opportunities on best use and practice of not only Sakai but of how Sakai can be used with other tools and technologies. In some cases for instructors we've had to help them unlearn how processes work in other LMSs to recognize how they are different in Sakai.
  • Sakai has provided greater ROI, where prior to using Sakai about half of our constituents were using an LMS, now more than 80% are doing so. Some of this has come about because of how Sakai works with our SIS, providing a consistent and available course site to every instructor for every course and section offered. It has also allowed us to contract with subject matter experts to create, manage, polish and reuse course structures, designs and content term over term.
  • With the cost-effective storage of 1000s of course sites, we have yet to figure out how to keep tight reign on which courses contain the most up to date content, accessibility modifications and instructor-specific content. Sakai doesn't provide an over-the-top way to manage versions of a course, except by way of term to term or special name designation on course site creation.
When considering an LMS there are multiple factors to consider, and typically those factors are not co-equal amongst all stakeholders. Some institutions select an LMS based on C-Level directive; others narrow the field based on feedback from the largest constituent user base or as feedback about how the current platform lacks. In any case regardless of these variables, the final word comes down to "fit". Fit for us was best defined by feature set as compared to our (then current) LMS, cost, and ROI over time. Launching multiple online programs and courses over a 5 years and doing so with Sakai allowed us to re-invest the savings from our LMS budget into faculty development, publicizing and developing courses strategically and deliberately and in having a better seat at how we needed the LMS to work rather than being dictated to by our LMS provider. Sakai is not Canvas or Blackboard. In speaking with an ID about Blackboard, "it's just so ugly, and there are things I really have to hodge-podge together" Having used Canvas, it's just sort of 'vanilla' and the interface is confusing (from an educator's standpoint). Sakai as an LMS is nimble, flexible, fully functional, practically unlimited and connected (just like the global community that supports it). A market-share chart may indicate a low number, but that number may have more to do with the solidness, responsiveness an resilience of a platform over time that just keeps working well. Sakai has areas that need to be improved, but I feel we have a say in when, how fast and how much I can spend to make those improvements reality. We're more than satisfied with Sakai, we're elated.
Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS), Microsoft Office 2016, Camtasia
Return to navigation