ArcGIS great for data mapping and statistical spatial analysis!
October 21, 2019
ArcGIS great for data mapping and statistical spatial analysis!
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with ArcGIS
Our research group, specifically, is using ArcGIS to spatially and statistically analyse groundwater chemistry across a large regional area. It allows for a really comprehensive understanding of the data and how it is spatially constrained, or not. Other research groups across the university, especially geography-related, use ArcGIS in their classes and in their research projects.
Pros
- Various kriging/interpolation options for mapping out data and seeing the spatial variance.
- Decent organizations structuring available for folders and subfolders.
- Ability to project data on-the-fly simply, by dragging previously input data into a new data frame.
Cons
- Aesthetically, it isn't exactly a modern looking interface, although that doesn't create issues with functionality.
- If happens that if there are any special symbols in the excel spreadsheet you are trying to input, it will not allow the data to be input and will not state what the issue is. Best practice is no spaces, no special characters, join words with underscores.
- Probably highly dependent on how much 'power' your computer has but often the interpolations and calculations take quite a long time to compute.
- Significantly decreased time that would have been spent calculating spatial statistics.
- Allowed for quick interpolations so to see what the data looked like spatially. Time saver.
- Created good looking figures for incorporating into peer reviewed journals.
I am more familiar with ArcGIS and therefore, in some ways, I find it more intuitive to use than Spotfire. ArcGIS is more of a fundamental GIS system where as Spotfire incorporates additional tools like data graphing. ArcGIS was best for our research projects because we were interested in creating various interpolations of our data.
Do you think ArcGIS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ArcGIS's feature set?
Yes
Did ArcGIS live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of ArcGIS go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy ArcGIS again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation