Item: BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued)
Rating: 6
Author: Kevin Thompson

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

BlueJeans is currently being used across our whole organization. We are a global organization with offices in North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America. We use it locally as a replacement for our MCU appliance. It has allowed us greater efficiency in having meetings with all of our partners.

Pros and Cons

The technology is system agnostic and works well with all video platforms and endpoints.

Improvement can be made in deploying needed technologies, meeting tools, and more flexible security platforms, in a timely manner.

Return on Investment

Saved money on travel for meetings.
Provided greater flexibility in having impromptu meetings.

Alternatives Considered

Zoom, Zoom Video Webinar, ZOOM Quality Management Suite and Cisco Webex Teams (formerly Cisco Spark)

I selected BlueJeans prior to evaluating the other services. My company has added Zoom and WebEx Teams to its portfolio. Right now, the other two are outperforming BlueJeans in performance, ease of use, and cost.

Likelihood to Recommend

BlueJeans is well suited for companies with satellite offices and mobile employees. The cloud-based collaboration service seamlessly translates different video and audio platforms into one meeting. Where the company falls short is the deployment cycle for requested features that other services deploy routinely.

An honest look at BlueJeans

Overall Satisfaction with BlueJeans

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros and Cons

Return on Investment

Alternatives Considered

Likelihood to Recommend

BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued) Feature Ratings