No say in selection engineer but works at what it needs too
June 12, 2018
No say in selection engineer but works at what it needs too
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Aironet and Catalyst 3800 Series Access Points
We use Cisco 3600s and 3700s as our primary access point and we also use the Officenet OEAP 612 1810 and 1815 for remote access users.
- Ease of use
- Troubleshooting tools on controller
- No separate power needed
- More plug and play
- Faster throughput for OEAP
- Dedicated radios for packet capture, no need to turn off other radios to do what is needed
- Very expensive
- We have a lot of failure and we have to spend man power on replacing failed devices
Cisco Aironet Additional Questions
- Existing Relationship with the Vendor
Evaluating Cisco Aironet and Catalyst 3800 Series Access Points and Competitors
Using Cisco Aironet and Catalyst 3800 Series Access Points
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Well integrated Quick to learn Feel confident using | None |
- One controller
- Easy to change and move APS to different groups
- Search in controller
Yes, but I don't use it