Overall Satisfaction with Microsoft Authenticator
To authenticate our communication systems like outlook , VP, team.
- Microsoft Authenticator also supports passwordless login options
- fingerprint and facial recognition
- support of Azure Active Directory
- ability to use the app to generate one-time passcodes, as well as push notifications
- the app can be difficult to use and navigate
- Microsoft Authenticator currently only supports a limited number of languages
- Microsoft Authenticator is only available on mobile devices, it does not have a web version or a desktop app
- ability to use the app to generate one-time passcodes, as well as push notifications for account login approvals
- Microsoft Authenticator also supports passwordless login options, such as using your fingerprint or facial recognition to confirm your identity
- It also allows to manage multiple accounts and support of Azure Active Directory.
- using a strong, two-factor authentication solution like Microsoft Authenticator can have a positive impact on a business by helping to secure access to sensitive data and resources
- reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches,which can be costly in terms of both financial and reputational damage
- Microsoft Authenticator can also help to improve employee productivity by providing secure and convenient access to company resources and data.
One of the main differences between the two apps is that Microsoft Authenticator is tightly integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem, including Azure Active Directory and Office 365. This makes it a natural choice for businesses that use Microsoft products and services. Additionally, Microsoft Authenticator supports passwordless login options, such as using your fingerprint or facial recognition to confirm your identity. It also allows to manage multiple accounts.Google Authenticator, on the other hand, is more widely supported by a variety of services and apps, which may make it a better choice for users who need to authenticate to a wide range of services. Additionally, Google Authenticator is available on multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, and desktop.Ultimately, the choice between Microsoft Authenticator and Google Authenticator will depend on the specific needs of the user or organization. If the user is primarily using Microsoft services and products, Microsoft Authenticator may be the more logical choice. On the other hand, if the user needs to authenticate to a wide range of services and apps, Google Authenticator may be a better option.
Do you think Microsoft Entra ID delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Microsoft Entra ID's feature set?
Yes
Did Microsoft Entra ID live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Microsoft Entra ID go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Microsoft Entra ID again?
Yes