Would not purchase SL today
Updated February 04, 2015

Would not purchase SL today

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 2 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version


Modules Used

  • GL
  • AP
  • CN

Overall Satisfaction with Microsoft Dynamics SL

It is being used for AP/AR in Accounting; users are in more departments than just Acctg. (For example, I am in Land). We were using QuickBooks and this was supposed to streamline our processes and handle more payees. The reporting capabilities were supposed to be great; they are not turning out to be even remotely sufficient for what we need.
  • It is sufficient to process AP
  • It is sufficient to process POs
  • The reporting functions should be much more robust
  • We have too many glitches and work - arounds
  • Our support has been minimally effective
  • The licenses are too expensive for the quality of the product
  • Not my question to answer for our company.
I would love to have the Quorum product for our company; it is what the future-focused players in the industry are using.
I would not purchase SL if I had that authority for my company. It is old software that is not being upgraded or supported, and it is full of bugs. The reporting functions are minimal.

Using Microsoft Dynamics SL

14 - Accounting, Land, Engineering, Construction
1 - Analysis, attention to detail, data entry, focus, follow-through
The cost - benefit ratio is weak. And when I way benefit, I mean not just money, but time. We waste a lot of time dealing with SL's issues.

Microsoft Dynamics SL Implementation

Using Microsoft Dynamics SL