AceProject vs. Projecturf

It is well suited if you have a specific work force or are working in a production or an assembly line style environment. It is also well suited if you have small teams that have to get out a certain amount of product in set periods of time. AceProjects is great for monitoring how long each individual spent on their specific task and subsequently how long the team took to complete their work.

Incentivized

It is appropriate for team tasks. It is not appropriate for us to use a medical scheduling tool for our participants.

• Time Tracking
• Resource allocation
• Easy to implement, small adoption curve.

Incentivized

• Manages files and communication
• Allows us to track tickets
• Ensures we have tasks clearly outlined with timelines

• Expand on data tracking
• Improve report generation
• Break out from just being a time clock manager.

Incentivized

• From what I understand, there was no good way to tracking the time it took to complete tasks and a way to evaluate all that data.
• Sometimes, when a team member thought they posted something on the notes module it is never viewable by other members.

Incentivized

I am not in the position to choose our project management software, and my current company has already used our current software for a number of years. But if I were to ever use project management software for personal projects with remote team members then I think Projecturf would be a great contender for the job.

Incentivized

Incentivized

It is very good against its competition. We have used tools like Asana, Basecamp, Wrike and Trello, and it outpaces all of them.

• We were able to track our production teams work and refine our methods to improve deliverable dates.
• Once our staff reached a certain size the capability of the software began to lag. Diminishing returns.
• The lack of reporting features made data regression and extrapolation difficult.

Incentivized

• Saves us time