Agiloft offers contract lifecycle management (CLM) software, connecting contractual commitments to real business outcomes using its Data-first Agreement Platform (DAP). With contract data as the foundation, customers can collaboratively reach agreement and leverage contract visibility. Employing artificial intelligence as a legal force multiplier, and integration capabilities as a data liberator, organizations can use Agiloft’s certified implementers to deliver connected,…
N/A
Kira
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Kira, now from Litera (acquired August, 2021) is software that searches and analyzes contract text. Kira offers pre-built, machine learning models covering due diligence, general commercial, corporate organization, real estate and compliance. Using Kira Quick Study, anyone can train additional models that can identify any desired clause. Kira can be deployed on virtual data rooms and other large repositories of contracts, creating summary analyses.
N/A
Pricing
Agiloft
Litera Kira
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agiloft
Kira
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agiloft
Litera Kira
Features
Agiloft
Litera Kira
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
9.5
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Litera Kira
-
Ratings
Contract creation
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract templates
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided logic
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
8.8
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Litera Kira
-
Ratings
Contract sharing
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract editing
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval process
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
7.7
4 Ratings
7% below category average
Litera Kira
-
Ratings
Contract database
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract search
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom contract reports
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tracking contract status
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance check
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft is great for storing contracts and being able to run reports on those contracts. Where is lacks is when there are amendments to the contracts which change information that you will run a report on. Since the data doesn't stack, if I wanted to run a report on any agreement with unpaid time off and there was unpaid time off added in the first amendment but removed in the second amendment, the first amendment would still hit the report even though the unpaid time off was removed in a later amendment
Kira is a great due diligence tool and can be well utilised on both large and small transactions. It also has good application if you are looking to compare multiple documents against a model form document or market standard templates. Kira is less useful if you are looking to review emails (e.g. as part of a disclosure exercise); or if your review involves non-Latin based script languages.
Inability to relabel smart fields to suit the review process means it is hard to align it to particular projects (e.g. it would be useful to relabel the "Assignment" smart field as "Is the contract assignable?")
Not enough non-English smart fields.
Needs the ability to resell user-trained smart fields in a marketplace.
Output is not customizable enough.
Built-in analysis tools are useful but a little basic.
As with our brains, we only use 10% of its capability. It can be as complex as you want it to be or as simple. The training requirements to use it have been minimal depending on the application. This is really a reflection as to how the workflow was configured
If our firm had more contracts in English, the usability of Kira would be rated higher. However, since we have to train clauses in Portuguese in order to use Kira, it makes its usability lower. We still are not able to fully use Kira for reading contracts in Portuguese. It takes a long time and many associate hours to make Kira usable in other languages.
Implementation was relatively easy and I have not had any issues with the support. UI change created some challenges for the end-users, but overall, it was a smooth experience. I hope the company will continue investing in the product and not consider it as something to not care about too much. I believe Agiloft does not make any other software, so I think the focus on it should not wane.
Customer Support is excellent. The online help portal is probably the best I have ever seen. Great videos with content easily found. The HelpLine is staffed by knowledgeable people. The videos have saved us providing a lot of in-house training, which we would struggle to resource. The account managers really know the product and their law firm clients and share best practices and trends.
Prior to implementing Agiloft, we used ProLaw. ProLaw acts as an electronic library for all contracts across the company. We were able to get this to work for us but it was limited in what functionality it provided. Agiloft is far superior when it comes to tracking and contract generation. Both systems store the agreements; however, Agiloft does a lot of the work for us. It creates the agreements with the click of a button, manages user permissions, sends automated reminders without requiring setup. These are all things ProLaw either didn't have or had but required manual entry. I was not the one who selected Agiloft as our new system, but after using it I can see why it was chosen.
Kira offers a lot more out of the box than other providers and is also more flexible around integrations. This, plus the clear pricing structure, is why we went for it instead of (or as well as) others. Diligen, RAVN, Leverton, Della, Seal not in list.