TrustRadius

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) vs. Turbo

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon EKS
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a managed container service to run and scale Kubernetes applications in the cloud or on-premises, available on AWS or on-premise through Amazon EKS Anywhere.
$0.10
per month
Turbo
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Turbo (formerly Spoon) is the eponymous application virtualization offering from the small Seattle based company, for isolating apps and running them without installation. Turbo can be deployed on-premise for enterprises (Turbo Server) and extended to provide other features. Additionally, Turbo Studio provides an authoring tool for creating virtual environments.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Turbo
Editions & Modules
Amazon EKS Cluster
$.10
per hour of each cluster created
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon EKSTurbo
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Turbo
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Turbo
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Turbo
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Turbo
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
It is well suited when you want to have a Kubernetes cluster in AWS Cloud and want to avoid all the management overhead of maintaining your own cluster in terms of the control plane. EKS seems to be lacking in features when compared with AKS and GKE. Backups, service mesh, and monitoring have a lot of room for improvements.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Turbo.net (formerly Spoon.net)
No answers on this topic
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Managed control plane
  • Autoscaling
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Turbo.net (formerly Spoon.net)
No answers on this topic
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • AWSIAM integration with Kubernetes RBAC could be better.
  • Enabling some add-ons like service mesh, and monitoring will be nice instead of having to install them yourself after the creation of the cluster.
  • EKS bootstrap time could be faster ...
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Turbo.net (formerly Spoon.net)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
It feels like AWS is behind the EKS race, the only advantage I'm able to see right now is the support of IPv6, however, trying to promote AWS alternatives that are different from the market and more like a vendor locking solutions like ECS/Fargate have kept AWS behind and focusing on the wrong things. EKS needs to really improve its integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem and have an enterprise solution for monitoring, backups, and service mesh.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Turbo.net (formerly Spoon.net)
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Migrating all our workloads from ec2 VMs to containers running in Kubernetes has been a huge improvement for the management and resilience of our Infrastructure.
  • EKS Upgrade process to a new version seems to be taking very long ....
  • EKS creation time usually takes over 10 minutes in us-east-1, we would like faster creation times to be under 5 minutes.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Turbo.net (formerly Spoon.net)
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots