Likelihood to Recommend | Well suited for small organizations to medium-sized teams/organizations. Apache Archiva is well suited for: - It acts as a central repository/proxy of the artifacts generated and used by the teams.
- It provides control on which open source repositories can be utilized by the team.
- Saves network bandwidth by reducing outbound traffic.
Apache Archiva is less appropriate for organizations where immediate support/bug resolutions are required. Read full review |
---|
Pros | - It's an open source project and therefore saves cost.
- It allows exchange of artifacts/libraries between different teams.
- It allows managing internal and external repositories with ease.
Read full review |
---|
Cons | - Muti-tenancy was hard to achieve.
- UI can be improved. Its seems bit dated.
- It is a bit tricky to setup.
Read full review |
---|
Alternatives Considered | - Apache Archiva is a great choice for organizations with a limited budget.
- Alternatives are expensive to acquire Archiva comes offers REST API(s) which allows the creation of customized UI.
- With Apache Archiva, it is easy to manage the remote proxy repositories.
- RBAC helps with managing user access to the repository.
- Configuration can be achieved using UI and stored in archiva.xml.
- Backup of configuration is quite simple.
Read full review |
---|
Return on Investment | - The impact of Apache Archiva on ROI has been positive. Since it is open source. It is free.
- It has allowed teams to store artifacts centrally, thus leading to a reduced need for multiple servers
- Security audits can be easily performed on the artifacts.
Read full review |
---|
ScreenShots | |
---|