TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Apache Cassandra vs. Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cassandra

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ACassandra is a no-SQL database from Apache.N/A

    Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAstra DB is a vector database for developers. In 2025 Datastax, the developer and supporter of Astra DB, was acquired. Astra DB is now available as a component of the IBM watsonx.data Multicloud offering.N/A
    Pricing
    CassandraAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CassandraAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CassandraAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    No answer on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    The biggest competitor was Cassandra which we have been using as the self-hosted solution, so we had the option of going to hosted versions as well. The main advantage of Astra was the ability to combine managed experience with scalability, which was Datastax' strong suit. The …
    Incentivized
    Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Astra in the general case ends up coming in cheaper than it costs to run your own VMs on a VPS to self-host either Cassandra or Scylla. How they do that, I don't know, but I'm glad they do!
    Incentivized
    Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Most of our time get spend on managing cluster while using Apache Cassandra but with astra as it is managed service we saves our lot of time
    Incentivized
    Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    We chose Astra as our primary database for time series data was already on Apache Cassandra. We also utilize a small postgres database for relational data within the application, but it made sense to migrate the data to Astra from Apache Cassandra.
    Incentivized
    Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    We already used some NoSQL databases and of course Apache Cassandra itself. We wanted cloud based and globally distributed Apache Cassandra as DBaaS service. Managing IaaS for this role is expensive and cumbersome in terms of managing yourself. Free tier and pricing model of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    We selected Astra for reducing complexity of our operations, local support, scalability, reliability, and business continuity/contingency planning reasons. We're a small team so prefer a database-as-a-solution model.
    Incentivized
    Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    For the workloads we use Astra DB for it was a better choice than the other databases.
    It worked out to be more scalable and cost affective than the traditional relational databases.
    Also performant and without the downsides of size limits compared to other services.
    Incentivized
    Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    46 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    45 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    45 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    40 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    44 Answers
    Features
    CassandraAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Vector Database
    Comparison of Vector Database features of Apache Cassandra and Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Feature
    Apache Cassandra
    -
    Ratings
    Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    8.0
    12 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Vector Data Connection00 Ratings8.212 Ratings
    Vector Data Editing00 Ratings8.56 Ratings
    Attribute Management00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
    Geospatial Analysis00 Ratings8.26 Ratings
    Geometric Transformations00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Vector Data Visualization00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Coordinate Reference System Management:00 Ratings7.96 Ratings
    Data Import/Export00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
    Symbolization and Styling00 Ratings8.35 Ratings
    Data Sharing and Collaboration00 Ratings7.69 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CassandraAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    HBase
    Score7.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Azure Cosmos DB
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CassandraAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (16 ratings)
    8.7
    (46 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.6
    (16 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.8
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (44 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CassandraAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    Apache Cassandra is a NoSQL database and well suited where you need highly available, linearly scalable, tunable consistency and high performance across varying workloads. It has worked well for our use cases, and I shared my experiences to use it effectively at the last Cassandra summit! http://bit.ly/1Ok56TK It is a NoSQL database, finally you can tune it to be strongly consistent and successfully use it as such. However those are not usual patterns, as you negotiate on latency. It works well if you require that. If your use case needs strongly consistent environments with semantics of a relational database or if the use case needs a data warehouse, or if you need NoSQL with ACID transactions, Apache Cassandra may not be the optimum choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    We've been super happy with Astra DB. It's been extremely well-suited for our vector search needs as described in previous responses. With Astra DB’s high-performance vector search, Maester’s AI dynamically optimizes responses in real-time, adapting to new user interactions without requiring costly retraining cycles.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Continuous availability: as a fully distributed database (no master nodes), we can update nodes with rolling restarts and accommodate minor outages without impacting our customer services.
    • Linear scalability: for every unit of compute that you add, you get an equivalent unit of capacity. The same application can scale from a single developer's laptop to a web-scale service with billions of rows in a table.
    • Amazing performance: if you design your data model correctly, bearing in mind the queries you need to answer, you can get answers in milliseconds.
    • Time-series data: Cassandra excels at recording, processing, and retrieving time-series data. It's a simple matter to version everything and simply record what happens, rather than going back and editing things. Then, you can compute things from the recorded history.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • We need to be able to process a lot of data (our biggest clients process hundreds of milions of transactions every month). However, it is not only the amount of data, it is also an unpredictable patterns with spikes occuring at different points of time - something athat Astra is great at.
    • Our processing needs to be extremaly fast. Some of our clients use our enrichment in a synchronous way, meaning that any delay in processing is holding up the whole transaction lifecycle and can have a major impact on the client. Astra is very fast.
    • A close collaboration with GCP makes our life very easy. All of our technology sits in Google Cloud, so having Astra in there makes it a no-brainer solution for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Cassandra runs on the JVM and therefor may require a lot of GC tuning for read/write intensive applications.
    • Requires manual periodic maintenance - for example it is recommended to run a cleanup on a regular basis.
    • There are a lot of knobs and buttons to configure the system. For many cases the default configuration will be sufficient, but if its not - you will need significant ramp up on the inner workings of Cassandra in order to effectively tune it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Need better fine-grained Security options.
    • The support team sometimes requires the escalate button pressed on tickets, to get timely responses. I will say, once the ticket is escalated, action is taken.
    • They require better documentation on the migration of data. The three primary methods for migrating large data volumes are bulk, Cassandra Data Migrator, and ZDM (Zero Downtime Migration Utility). Over time I have become very familiar will all three of these methods; however, through working with the Services team and the support team, it seemed like we were breaking new ground. I feel if the utilities were better documented and included some examples and/or use cases from large data migrations; this process would have been easier. One lesson learned is you likely need to migrate your application servers to the same cloud provider you host Astra on; otherwise, the latency is too large for latency-sensitive applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    I would recommend Cassandra DB to those who know their use case very well, as well as know how they are going to store and retrieve data. If you need a guarantee in data storage and retrieval, and a DB that can be linearly grown by adding nodes across availability zones and regions, then this is the database you should choose.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Apache
    It’s great tool but it can be complicated when it comes administration and maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    It's a great product but suffers with counters. This isn't a deal breaker but lets down what is otherwise a good all round solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    Sometimes instead giving straight answer, we ‘re getting transfered to talk professional service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Their response time is fast, in case you do not contact them during business hours, they give a very good follow-up to your case. They also facilitate video calls if necessary for debugging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    We evaluated MongoDB also, but don't like the single point failure possibility. The HBase coupled us too tightly to the Hadoop world while we prefer more technical flexibility. Also HBase is designed for "cold"/old historical data lake use cases and is not typically used for web and mobile applications due to its performance concern. Cassandra, by contrast, offers the availability and performance necessary for developing highly available applications. Furthermore, the Hadoop technology stack is typically deployed in a single location, while in the big international enterprise context, we demand the feasibility for deployment across countries and continents, hence finally we are favor of Cassandra
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Graph, search, analytics, administration, developer tooling, and monitoring are all incorporated into a single platform by Astra DB. Mongo Db is a self-managed infrastructure. Astra DB has Wide column store and Mongo DB has Document store. The best thing is that Astra DB operates on Java while Mongo DB operates on C++
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    We are well aware of the Cassandra architecture and familiar with the open source tooling that Datastax provides the industry (K8sSandra / Stargate) to scale Cassandra on Kubernetes.
    Having prior knowledge of Cassandra / Kubernetes means we know that under the hood Astra is built on infinitely scalable technologies. We trust that the foundations that Astra is built on will scale so we know Astra will scale.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • I have no experience with this but from the blogs and news what I believe is that in businesses where there is high demand for scalability, Cassandra is a good choice to go for.
    • Since it works on CQL, it is quite familiar with SQL in understanding therefore it does not prevent a new employee to start in learning and having the Cassandra experience at an industrial level.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Better uptime due to the managed service having no outages
    • Less technical debt because we don't need to worry about upgrading our Cassandra clusters
    • Lower cost on infrastructure as a whole
    • Quick and easy to integrate vector search into our tech stack
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots