Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluence
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$6.40
per month per user
Conceptboard
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Conceptboard is a collaboration software built for teams of any size. Its primary features are project management, team whiteboards, integration into business workflows, and real-time collaboration.N/A
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Atlassian ConfluenceConceptboardMiro
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluenceConceptboardMiro
Free Trial
YesNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian ConfluenceConceptboardMiro
Considered Multiple Products
Confluence
Chose Atlassian Confluence
The alternatives tested are based only on the whiteboarding functionality added by Confluence Whiteboard, and not the core Confluence functionality (documentation).

Chose Atlassian Confluence
Overall, Atlassian Confluence is a user-friendly tool and offers such a vast array of capabilities for project and knowledge management purposes and beyond. Other tools listed above have much more limited capabilities, although they are great tools for very specific needs and …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
The main reason for moving to Atlassian Confluence was for: 1) Having 1 space that holds all of the org's documentation and knowledge sharing 2)We already used JSM and Jira so it would an organic move to have Atlassian Confluence as our main documentation hub 3) The cost …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is a super handy hub for sharing ideas and keeping all your docs in one place. While Jira Service Management is more about handling tickets and support issues, Atlassian Confluence really makes teamwork easy. I feel Atlassian Confluence is user-friendly, …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
Confluence has a more robust set of capabilities compared to Dovetail and Trello and also was already approved by our legal and compliance teams, so it tends to keep its stickiness due to that. It's also widely known in the market as a knowledge management tool. I would say it …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
We choose Atlassian Confluence because it is the reference for managing a SAAS wiki service. And having such a solution in our company to manage the knowledge and especially the knowledge transfer is crucial.
Chose Atlassian Confluence
It's good if you're using Atlassian products, the other ones provide different connections and better UX for documentation in different ways.
Chose Atlassian Confluence
There are similar products to Confluence - for us, being a big automotive company, it was important that the tool was scalable and easy to roll out to the different departments and branches of the company. Confluence was the best in that regard and was very quickly accepted in …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
Organisations might have chosen to Procure Atlassian Confluence because JIRA is integral to software development. Notion or Google Docs do not work seamlessly with JIRA. Also, Atlassian Confluence has a much higher perceived seriousness about a document as compared to Google …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
SharePoint is use by our operational teams as it allows team sites to be set up with links heading out to other resources. It is almost like a central hub or intranet. Confluence doesn't quite work in the same way however it does a better job functioning as a knowledge base.
Chose Atlassian Confluence
I personally prefer the usage of alternative project management or document storage apps. Atlassian Confluence is useful in having a centralised spot for multiple types of information, as opposed to Trello for example, and is much more structured. However, it has low visual …
Conceptboard
Chose Conceptboard
Miro is a superior product with more capabilities and better suited for advanced users. We selected Conceptboard as a short-term solution that was low-cost compared to Miro but allowed users to create boards. Once users are versed in Conceptboard, they are better off using Miro
Chose Conceptboard
Conceptboard provides an easy whiteboard with multi-functions, that aren't lagging while more people are working on it and that is easy to self-explain, while I faced lagging while using Miro. Conceptboard is just easy compatible in any business situation (in-office, Zoom …
Chose Conceptboard
I like ConceptBoard better than Miro. Miro also offers a similar virtual "whiteboard" but Conceptboard has a better UX and is easier (and more fun) to use.

I've used Figma extensively, and still do, for UX planning and design but have moved away from them for brainstorming. Figma
Chose Conceptboard
Conceptboard has a very simple interface design. and stands out with a successful UX/UI design. can offer a rapid adaptation process for volatile employees and customers. While it has many features compared to its competitors, its interface is not complicated. However, some of …
Chose Conceptboard
ConceptBoard is a very solid solution that has been around since a long time. It allows to handle easily collaborative workshops and design sessions.
Chose Conceptboard
Conceptboard does not lag as compared to its other competitors. It is fast and easy to use and is very much considerable from the pricing point of view as well because of low cost monthly plans. It is simple and right on point with the latest updated tools which is what makes …
Chose Conceptboard
Initially, we selected Conceptboard due to its quick TAT with respect to integration and implementation. Also, it is a quite cheaper option as compared to its direct competitors. The main reason to select Conceptboard was - 1. The infinite canvas really helped with longer …
Chose Conceptboard
Conceptboard's user interface is a lot more intuitive, flexible, and easy to use. Real-time monitoring down to cursor movements is also something that Conceptboard has an edge on, as well as allowing for file attachments to which you can annotate or comment directly on the …
Miro
Chose Miro
Miro is more cost effective than Visio.
Confluence is a bit more structured for architecture diagrams and capturing technical requirements.
Chose Miro
Miro's strength is it's specialty - Atlassian Confluence has so many different features that the whiteboards and real-time collaboration do not stack up against Miro's focused, curated UIX. Figma does a good job bridging the gap between design and engineering, but for overall …
Chose Miro
It comes with a rich library of templates and facilitation features like timers and voting. But Miro is better in asynchronous mode. Also, the real-time collaboration between remote teams is better when we use Miro. In fact, I didn't try the tools and decided to use Miro. I …
Chose Miro
As with previous questions, Miro is a lot easier personally. And it's impactful to present from. But complete beginners tend to be overwhelmed and not understand it as quickly as I had previously experienced in a company that had adopted it more widely.
Chose Miro
Miro is very intuitive, but I think it's more a force of habit. The features aren't massively differentiated; it's just that we've been using Miro for longer and are used to it.
Chose Miro
collaboration, collaboration , collaboration. It's all about that and this is why Miro won. But the capability to make export is less good than with draw.io (with the code embedded in a png file)
Chose Miro
I haven't used any competitor to Miro; I started using it directly after getting good recommendations from YouTube and Google search.
Chose Miro
Not as good as Miro. Used once or twice and that's it. I don't even remember it other than being disappointing. I think Miro is better across the board. Other platforms have 1 or 2 things that Miro encompasses (like tools with whiteboards), but nothin really has all the …
Chose Miro
I tried other tools like Mural and FigJam before using Miro. FigJam was easy to understand, but it felt too simple for the kind of big projects my team works on. Mural was fine, but it did not have enough features to handle complex work or large teams. Miro worked much better …
Chose Miro
Miro is top of list for me

I moved to Miro as it was a welcome change and everyone in my team adapted ( noteasy unless platform is great )
Chose Miro
The performance and features of Miro are so much better compared to any competitor. Miro product development also feels way faster and better.
Chose Miro
The all in one tool aspect is hard to beat. None of the others are really able to cover Agile Methodologies, Technical diagramming and Workshop Facilitation and Presentations in the one tool.
Chose Miro
Compared to Jira, draw.io, and Whimsical, Miro stands out for its fluidity and adaptability. Jira is great for structured project tracking, but Miro offers a more visual, flexible environment for ideation and alignment. draw.io feels static in comparison, and Whimsical, though …
Chose Miro
I selected Miro because it’s the only tool out of all that can combine visuals with collaboration, comment and feedback. Since we have people from all sub-divisions that need a shared workspace to collaborate, an easy to use tool with maximum impact would make the greatest …
Chose Miro
Miro is fair superior as these are not their bread and butter like it is for Miro, but if left unchecked Miro could be easily overtaken by the ease and visual appeal to these other collab products
Chose Miro
I would say on par, but a better value than Mural, hence why our company changed contracts. And, at this time, much better than Microsoft Whiteboard. With that being said, Microsoft has a lot of money to throw at it to add more features and obviously syncs with other office …
Chose Miro
I have used Slack, jira, and draw.io before. Slack is great for quick communication and Jira helps track tasks, but Miro stands out for its visual thingy.
Unlike draw.io, Miro is more flexible and interactive also has better and flexible sticky or frames, allowing teams to …
Chose Miro
The abundance of tools available for any work needed including but not limited to tasks like interfaces sketching, post-its organization, virtual workshoping. With the wide selection of templates, many such tasks are just one click away versus other tools where the users need …
Features
Atlassian ConfluenceConceptboardMiro
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.0
157 Ratings
11% below category average
Conceptboard
-
Ratings
Miro
-
Ratings
Task Management7.1125 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.912 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.221 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.389 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.7116 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Search6.8155 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.2126 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
157 Ratings
1% below category average
Conceptboard
-
Ratings
Miro
-
Ratings
Chat6.415 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.2154 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions7.7147 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.015 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.0148 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.37 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.610 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
156 Ratings
4% below category average
Conceptboard
-
Ratings
Miro
-
Ratings
Versioning8.2135 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files6.8104 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files6.896 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.3151 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.6146 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.3113 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.947 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.384 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian ConfluenceConceptboardMiro
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Miro
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian ConfluenceConceptboardMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(173 ratings)
2.7
(21 ratings)
9.1
(6063 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(21 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(185 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(61 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(449 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(20 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(19 ratings)
Support Rating
5.4
(25 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(63 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3657 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(14 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3999 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(19 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.9
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian ConfluenceConceptboardMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
I would recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies that want to have internal documentation and minimum governance processes to ensure documentation is useful and doesn't have a lot of duplicated and non-updated content. I wouldn't recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies with a low budget since this product might be a little costly (especially with add-ons).
Read full review
Conceptboard
Well suited - 1. Whiteboarding, brainstorming, designing, workshops, etc. 2. Templates - Pretty good repository of ready-to-use templates esp for project management, agile, etc. Less appropriate - 1. Anything that requires integration with existing enterprising software - limitations like no integration with Jira, Asana, etc. 2. Embedding anything related to images, videos, etc. The embed is not very smooth, it lags, and sometimes straight out doesn't work 3. Image search - Many competitors provide this feature and hence Conceptboard lacks here
Read full review
Miro
Actually I answered this question on the first step. Detailing it I’d say that it’s comfortable to use for company education or brainstorm sessions, but I lack of flexibility to use it for operations quick stuff cuz team plans are limited
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
  • Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
  • Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
Read full review
Conceptboard
  • Great user interface that's very intuitive and easy to use. This is an important aspect of collaboration, brainstorming sessions often involve a lot of people coming from different functions who may not be too familiar with these tools
  • Allows users to see real-time changes and actions done by others from sticky notes/comments down to their cursor movements
  • Lets users add/attach files and annotate/comment on each directly on the board which skips the hassle of having to look at files using different programs/platforms and referencing on the board
Read full review
Miro
  • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
  • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
  • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
  • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
  • Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
  • Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
Read full review
Conceptboard
  • The sticky note tool glitches and behaves as if it were moving on a grid.
  • PDF upload tool does not work fast. Maybe a PDF merge algorithm could be added.
  • The selection area is not visible when dragging the eraser tool.
Read full review
Miro
  • As a designer, I miss some more creative features. I can't even get really into designing small things (like paths). Many of my colleagues have already switched to the Figma board because it is possible there.
  • Things often get lost in the workflow, especially in teams. Working on the same file often leads to misunderstandings and can be frustrating. For example, if text is accidentally deleted and cannot be recovered, or if images become distorted.
  • The scale on the board is missing, which often leads to size differences.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
Conceptboard
No answers on this topic
Miro
Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
Great for organizing knowledge in a hierarchical format. Seamless for engineering and product teams managing software development. Helps in formatting pages effectively, reducing manual work. Tracks changes well and allows for easy rollbacks. Granular controls for who can view/edit pages. Search function is not great which needs improvement. Hire some google engineers
Read full review
Conceptboard
No answers on this topic
Miro
There are some features that I think could be smoother or more dynamic in the free version; for instance, the connection of graphics/text boxes with lines can get a bit messy and a bit limited if you want to do something specific with the line, like a free-drawn element. But this is really minor!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Atlassian
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
Conceptboard
No answers on this topic
Miro
I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
Read full review
Performance
Atlassian
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
Conceptboard
No answers on this topic
Miro
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
Conceptboard
No answers on this topic
Miro
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
Read full review
Online Training
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Conceptboard
No answers on this topic
Miro
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
Conceptboard
No answers on this topic
Miro
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
Read full review
Conceptboard
Miro is a superior product with more capabilities and better suited for advanced users. We selected Conceptboard as a short-term solution that was low-cost compared to Miro but allowed users to create boards. Once users are versed in Conceptboard, they are better off using Miro which has more integration, better capabilities, and is overall a more complete product.
Read full review
Miro
Both FigJam and Canva have infinite whiteboarding, but Miro is a much more complete package. FigJam is very fast, but it's also very simplistic in its features. Canva has other qualities, like being more design-heavy, but its whiteboarding feature set is not on par with Miro's. Miro is the only platform that lets a user start a project from a messy brainstorm and bring it to full completion, along with all tasks and deliverables, all on one board.
Read full review
Scalability
Atlassian
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
Conceptboard
No answers on this topic
Miro
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • The AI feature which lets me find relevant documents while reading one document is really beneficial.
  • Centralising of knowledge systems is one of the key differentiators for large organisations.
  • As long as folks keep using Google Docs and Atlassian Confluence, there is going to be a challenge in building a continuum.
Read full review
Conceptboard
  • I can say that this tool is unique since its impact on our work team has been one of the best we have ever had since it allows us to exchange ideas in one place through boards, which is more fun with the video call function
Read full review
Miro
  • This is one of those platforms where the entire team needs to be bought into it, or it doesn't function as intended. Once we achieved that, it's been a wonderful tool for brainstorming and project management internally.
  • Surprisingly, Miro has not allowed us to reduce software; however, it's a worthwhile addition to our tech stack.
  • Our team has Miro boards bookmarked, and we know exactly where to go when we have ideas or things that we want to add. It's great to know that we will receive notifications when that happens.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.