AWS Fargate vs. Percona Server
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS Fargate | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | AWS Fargate is a compute engine for Amazon ECS that allows the user to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters. With AWS Fargate there is no need to provision, configure, and scale clusters of virtual machines to run containers. | $0 *per hour |
Percona Server | Score9.7 out of 10 | N/A | Percona Server for MySQL is a free, compatible, enhanced, open source drop-in replacement for MySQL. Percona states it provides superior performance, scalability, and instrumentation. Boasting over 5,300,000 downloads, Percona Server’s self-tuning algorithms and support for high-performance hardware delivers excellent performance and reliability Percona Server for MySQL delivers enterprise-grade features and higher uptime, along with a number of key benefits that… | N/A |
| AWS Fargate | Percona Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | *based on US East rates. Price varies region to region. | Free and open-source | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS Fargate | Percona Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| AWS Fargate | Percona Server | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS Fargate | Percona Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 | MongoDB Atlas Score7.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 | ![]() Azure Database Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 | Google Cloud SQL Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS Fargate | Percona Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 6.7 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 8.0 | - |
| AWS Fargate | Percona Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Percona Server Screenshots |






