Ayasdi Core vs Datadeck

• Ayasdi Core provides an easy way to get some insight on data. Typically analytics may require having a model or hypothesis before starting to look into the data, but Ayasdi lets you just feed the data first then start seeing what the data looks like.
• Ayasdi Core's topological network visualization is quite unique. It allows you to explore patterns and potential relations between multiple data elements. A user can also dynamically navigate data with different aspects on the web.
• The Web version of Ayasdi is easy to use, stable, and fast. It hasn't crashed even when we feed it a lot of data sets, although it took time.

Read full review

• With DataDeck we can manage the Facebook Ads campaigns with no need to login to the Facebook Ads Manager dashboard
• We can easily monitor our MailChimp campaigns straight from the deck
• All of our Google Analytics accounts can be monitored using DataDeck

Read full review

• Use of Python SDK is required to feed data into Ayasdi, but it lacks training materials or sample codes for a novice to get started.
• Although Web UI of Ayasdi is looking good, often it freezes when the user runs an analysis. It doesn't crash but the web page needs to be refreshed to see the progress of analysis.
• Algorithms provided by Ayasdi, such as metrics types, lens types need to be explained (what they are and what their strengths and weaknesses are). We had to Google or do research on our own to understand what they are.

Read full review

• We think the DataDeck dashboard can be a little easier to organize
• For first time users, they can get lost with all the functionality DataDeck offers

Read full review