Azure Machine Learning vs. SAS Enterprise Miner

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Machine Learning
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Machine Learning is and end-to-end data science and analytics solution that helps professional data scientists to prepare data, develop experiments, and deploy models in the cloud. It replaces the Azure Machine Learning Workbench.
$0
per month
SAS Enterprise Miner
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
SAS Enterprise Miner is a data science and statistical modeling solution enabling the creation of predictive and descriptive models on very large data sources across the organization.N/A
Pricing
Azure Machine LearningSAS Enterprise Miner
Editions & Modules
Studio Pricing - Free
$0.00
per month
Production Web API - Dev/Test
$0.00
per month
Studio Pricing - Standard
$9.99
per ML studio workspace/per month
Production Web API - Standard S1
$100.13
per month
Production Web API - Standard S2
$1000.06
per month
Production Web API - Standard S3
$9999.98
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Machine LearningSAS Enterprise Miner
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Machine LearningSAS Enterprise Miner
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Azure Machine LearningSAS Enterprise Miner
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
SAS Enterprise Miner
8.8
5 Ratings
4% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings8.15 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings9.35 Ratings
MDM Integration00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
SAS Enterprise Miner
8.1
5 Ratings
4% below category average
Visualization00 Ratings7.15 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings9.25 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
SAS Enterprise Miner
8.0
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings7.85 Ratings
Data Transformations00 Ratings8.25 Ratings
Data Encryption00 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Built-in Processors00 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
SAS Enterprise Miner
8.8
5 Ratings
3% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings7.55 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings9.93 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings8.65 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
SAS Enterprise Miner
7.8
5 Ratings
9% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings8.55 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Machine LearningSAS Enterprise Miner
Small Businesses
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Machine LearningSAS Enterprise Miner
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(4 ratings)
9.9
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(2 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Machine LearningSAS Enterprise Miner
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
For [a] data scientist require[d] to build a machine learning model, so he/she didn't worry about infrastructure to maintain it.
All kind of feature[s] such as train, build, deploy and monitor the machine learning model available in a single suite.
If someone has [their] own environment for ML studio, so there [it would] not [be] useful for them.
Read full review
SAS
SAS Enterprise Miner is world-class software for individuals interested in developing reproducible models in a reasonable amount of time. Perhaps the most useful part of SAS Enterprise Miner is the ability to compare models with other models without writing code. The ensemble modeling capabilities is the easiest way to do ensemble modeling I have come across. SAS Enterprise Miner is well-suited for beginning to advanced analysts who know something about advanced analytics. The software is not well-suited for analysts or companies that have little interest in advanced modeling.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • User friendliness: This is by far the most user friendly tool I've seen in analytics. You don't need to know how to code at all! Just create a few blocks, connect a few lines and you are capable of running a boosted decision tree with a very high R squared!
  • Speed: Azure ML is a cloud based tool, so processing is not made with your computer, making the reliability and speed top notch!
  • Cost: If you don't know how to code, this is by far the cheapest machine learning tool out there. I believe it costs less than $15/month. If you know how to code, then R is free.
  • Connectivity: It is super easy to embed R or Python codes on Azure ML. So if you want to do more advanced stuff, or use a model that is not yet available on Azure ML, you can simply paste the code on R or Python there!
  • Microsoft environment: Many many companies rely on the Microsoft suite. And Azure ML connects perfectly with Excel, CSV and Access files.
Read full review
SAS
  • Enterprise Miner is really visual and lets you do a whole lot without actually going into the detailed options. For decent results, you should really explore the different advanced options though.
  • The recent versions of Miner allow users to use R code in Miner. You can then compare several models and approach to get the best performing model.
  • The resulting data is really well displayed and easy to understand (ex: the lift graph, score ranking, etc.)
  • Miner has the ability to integrate custom SAS code which allows the user to add functionalities that are specific to the project.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It would be great to have text tips that could ease new users to the platform, especially if an error shows up
  • Scenario-based documentation
  • Pre-processing of modules that had been previously run. Sometimes they need to be re-run for no apparent reason
Read full review
SAS
  • With large data sets, SAS Enterprise Miner sometimes takes a long time to run. Sometimes you have to just leave your computer running while Enterprise Miner does its thing.
  • If you want complete control over the modeling framework, you have to take what Enterprise Miner does and customize it. SAS seems to be working hard on making things easier to customize, but it's not completely there yet.
  • The graphic capabilities of SAS Enterprise Miner leave a lot to be desired, especially in the era of self-service business intelligence software.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Easy and fastest way to develop, test, deploy and monitor the machine learning model.
- Easy to load the data set
-Drag and drop the process of the Machine learning life cycle.
Read full review
SAS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support is nonexistent. It's very frustrating to try and find someone to actually talk to. The robot chatbots are just not well trained.
Read full review
SAS
I have contacted SAS twice in the past year and they have been super responsive both times. They solved my problem. I am also registered for an in-person class next month and they called today to tell me that it will be an online-only session. They apologized for the change and registered me for the online version. Super helpful!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Not sure
Read full review
SAS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
It is easier to learn, it has a very cost effective license for use, it has native build and created for Azure cloud services, and that makes it perfect when compared against the alternatives. As a Microsoft tool, it has been built to contain many visual features and improved usability even for non-specialist users.
Read full review
SAS
SAS EM has a very great set of machine learning and predictive analytics toolsets, which helped our organization achieve its goals. We used other tools, but for us, SAS EM was the most intuitive and easy to learn the tool and it provides greater data exploration and data preparation capabilities compared to the other tools we used.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Productivity: Instead of coding and recoding, Azure ML helped my organization to get to meaningful results faster;
  • Cost: Azure ML can save hundreds (or even thousands) of dollars for an organization, since the license costs around $15/month per seat.
  • Focus on insights and not on statistics: Since running a model is so easy, analysts can focus more on recommendations and insights, rather than statistical details
Read full review
SAS
  • SAS Enterprise Miner is a positive ROI in the sense that it saves a ton of time coding.
  • SAS Enterprise Miner is a negative ROI in that it's expensive, and perhaps makes analysts brainless.
Read full review
ScreenShots