Microsoft Yammer vs. Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Yammer
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Yammer is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups, making it an example of enterprise social software. It originally launched as an enterprise microblogging service and now has applications on several different operating systems and devices. The company was acquired by Microsoft in 2012.N/A
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server provides hosted collaboration and voice / web conferencing tools at the enterprise level.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft YammerOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft YammerOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft YammerOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft YammerOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Yammer
7.8
40 Ratings
0% below category average
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
7.1
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Task Management8.024 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.012 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Scheduling8.218 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.020 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Mobile Access7.238 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Search7.338 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.022 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Yammer
7.8
43 Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
5.5
2 Ratings
37% below category average
Chat8.539 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Notifications8.343 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Discussions9.142 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Surveys7.033 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase7.632 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting7.414 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts6.613 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook8.432 Ratings1.02 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Yammer
8.4
36 Ratings
3% above category average
Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
5.1
2 Ratings
46% below category average
Versioning7.025 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Video files8.631 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Audio files9.029 Ratings4.02 Ratings
Document collaboration8.830 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Access control8.030 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Advanced security features8.627 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive8.014 Ratings4.02 Ratings
Device sync9.023 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft YammerOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft YammerOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(53 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.9
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(12 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft YammerOracle Beehive Enterprise Collaboration Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Yammer is great when you have a company culture that encourages friendly collaboration and communication. It can be a great supplement (but certainly not a substitute) for bonding and sharing ideas and thoughts. Certain channels can be really successful, too, like a channel where people can post dog pictures or something fun like that!
Read full review
Oracle
The software is well suited in most areas of messaging. The communication features it contains and the messaging quality it utilizes provides for standards, like scalability, manageability and, most importantly, secure communications. Again, the software is well suited for scenarios where an organization is aimed at making use of a centralized management. it is built to provide a unified collaborative platform characterized by a single object model and also has a database storage for almost all communication records.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Providing a platform for social news in the company where "bottom up" topics can percolate freely across department
  • Social networking across the company where folks can divide their work into topics instead of teams
  • Basic collaboration within a group including document sharing with ability to pin documents to a team
Read full review
Oracle
  • Video conferencing - The features it provides is apart from any standalone.
  • Mail messenger `
  • Instant messaging
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Although the social enterprise network works very well, there is room for some slight improvement - such as the ability to attract users. By being part of the Microsoft Office Suite, it is offered as an "add-on" and many overlook it and see it as unnecessary at first. It would be smart for Microsoft to sell it as its own product so it could gather more popularity as a "social network".
  • Giving an option to filter results could be better as well as giving an option to turn off the "recent activity" bar on the home page.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The only area that the software has room for improvement is in the mail part. To a large extent, the email capabilities to the Oracle Beehive Enterprise Collaborative Server is not user-friendly. My opinion is that if the mail option was made in a more separate appearance to that of the calendar, task management, and address books it would appear more user-friendly.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Very available
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
It's a simple product but it does provide value.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Microsoft
The training that Microsoft provides is very generic training for Yammer. I like the fact the training is short and easy to understand
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
We organically implemented the product
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Our team briefly used Salesforce.com's Chatter product before switching over to Yammer in 2012. While Chatter is essentially the same product as Yammer, it left much to be desired. Chatter's design was (and remains) clunky and difficult to navigate. Yammer is a simple, easy-to-use product that offers similar functionality as Salesforce's Chatter.
Read full review
Oracle
The only feature that makes Beehive Enterprise Collaborative software stack up against similar software is unification. It is wholly unified. Basically, it allows IT to function as one platform providing services like email, team workspace, and conferencing. Uniquely, this results in saving time and cost related to managing separate systems
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • My company is pleased with the positive impact Yammer has created departmentally and on an individual basis with work flow efficiency.
  • Adversely, most old and new employees are more familiar with SharePoint, causing the company to pay for training for all current and incoming employees.
  • As Yammer becomes more widely used, the need for training may diminish, which is where we will see our return on investment, as the product clearly provides a more effective form of file sharing and communication between employees and their department.
Read full review
Oracle
  • If one uses all its features to its optimum, I think they can go for break-even within around 1 year. We were able to achieve it. It helped us grab many projects.
Read full review
ScreenShots