Make vs. IBM App Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Make (formerly Integromat) automates integration between applications. It features data transformation capabilities within a no-code graphic interface. The former Integromat was acquired by Celonis in 2020, and the current product Make is a Celonis brand.
$9
per month
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM’s App Connect is a cloud-based data integration platform with data mapping and transformation capabilities within connectors between high-volume systems. App Connect also offers near-real time data synchronization and an API builder that is adaptable to the user’s coding skill level.N/A
Pricing
MakeIBM App Connect
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
per month
Core
$9
per month
Pro
$16
per month
Teams
$29
per month
Enterprise
Contact
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MakeIBM App Connect
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MakeIBM App Connect
Features
MakeIBM App Connect
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Make
8.1
6 Ratings
1% above category average
IBM App Connect
8.4
9 Ratings
5% above category average
Pre-built connectors9.06 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Connector modification8.96 Ratings7.08 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration8.95 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Data quality services7.76 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Data security features7.75 Ratings8.59 Ratings
Monitoring console6.36 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MakeIBM App Connect
Small Businesses
Zapier
Zapier
Score 8.9 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
Zapier
Zapier
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
Azure Logic Apps
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MakeIBM App Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(6 ratings)
9.0
(10 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(4 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
2.0
(3 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
MakeIBM App Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
Celonis
Integromat is the best tool for business automation in my opinion because unlike Zapier it allows us to integrate with any API even if the app is not available which allows us to create automation even with the less known apps that we use or the ones that we built internally for our own company.
Read full review
IBM
IBM App Connect Enterprise is well-suited for high-volume enterprise systems that demand robust scalability and high reliability. It excels at hybrid connectivity by easily integrating various on-premises systems using its extensive catalog of connectors. It is also ideal for workflows that require a balance between efficient low-code and the incorporation of complex, custom Java logic. On the other hand, the platform is less appropriate in scenarios requiring high development autonomy, as installation and configuration at the server level is excessively complex, creating a strong dependency on other infrastructure teams. It is also not ideal if detailed traceability and monitoring of workflows must be seamlessly managed within the tool itself, as this is difficult to manage directly in ACE. IBM App Connect Enterprise está bien adaptado para sistemas empresariales de alto volumen que exigen una escalabilidad robusta y alta confiabilidad. Sobresale en la conectividad híbrida al integrar fácilmente diversos sistemas locales (on-premises) utilizando su amplio catálogo de conectores. Además, es ideal para flujos que requieren un equilibrio entre el low-code eficiente y la incorporación de lógica Java compleja y personalizada. Por otro lado, la plataforma es menos apropiada en escenarios donde se requiere una alta autonomía de desarrollo, debido a que la instalación y configuración a nivel de servidor es excesivamente compleja , lo cual crea una fuerte dependencia de otros equipos de infraestructura. Tampoco es ideal si la trazabilidad detallada y el monitoreo de los flujos deben gestionarse sin problemas dentro de la propia herramienta, ya que esto resulta difícil de manejar directamente en ACE. Parts of this review were originally written in Spanish and have been translated into English using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Read full review
Pros
Celonis
  • UI/UX Simplicity and Features
  • Workflows are explained in details and even people without IT background can use the tool.
  • Consumption is nicely tracked.
  • Myriad of existing templates, solutions, and readymade connectors.
Read full review
IBM
  • Just the ability to display and consume data through a single dashboard makes this a great application for our business purposes.
  • With the ability to consume their exposed API, data validation and manipulation becomes a breeze.
Read full review
Cons
Celonis
  • There are always new platforms and connections that we'd like to see
  • More flexibility in paying for operations (tasks) on a sliding scale, instead of by tier
  • More thorough support documentation on connecting various platforms and troubleshooting errors
Read full review
IBM
  • modernization made easy, when a modernized project is created by importing a java code.
  • more pre-built connectors
  • watsonx code assistance for ESQL capability.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Celonis
At this point, it is firmly embedded in the DNA of the business and to give up the ability to automate workflows and create integrations on the fly would be a terrible idea.
Read full review
IBM
It is the best on-premise application to cloud integration in the market. I guess IBM is planning to integrate IBM App Connect with the IBM API Connect solution.
Read full review
Usability
Celonis
Make's easy to understand user interface helps you to visualize what's happening at all times. Could use some tweaks around the navigation from a scenario specifically in the folders and back navigations. I can't tell you the amount of time wasted in that area. When you branch, you can't bring a branch back together in the same scenario which is kind of a bummer as well.
Read full review
IBM
You can do some really powerful things with this system. The overall design is an attempt to make configurable some of the routine tasks/common functionality, but allow for development/customization of the core of the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
Celonis
The pricing schema is very attractive, almost 50% lower than the competition. You could start from free and then grow. It has a pretty big library of connections to other apps and services, which really helps you when everything is a mess. Integromat has a really easy-to-use interface. You could do almost everything with fewer than 5 clicks. Scenarios (automation steps to complete a routine) have graphics so you can configure them more easily.
Read full review
IBM
Usually, the IBM Ops team provides a resolution or a response for 80% of defects raised in my project. There is one which has been open on their end for more than 3 months. With literally no response even after multiple follow-ups.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Celonis
Integromat allows us to do everything we used to do on Zapier but it doesn't limit us to only the popular apps, with Integromat we're integrating custom APIs and we get data from different servers through GET requests and it's exactly what we needed and Zapier couldn't provide it.
Read full review
IBM
IBM App Connect started as MQSeries Integrator (MQSI) more than 20 years ago. In the IT environment, this is like an eternity. And this allowed a lot of customer experience and needs to be embedded in the product. Without it becoming a legacy application. The changes done in the latest version are preparing it for a Cloud/containers world without losing the previously learned knowledge.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Celonis
  • We used too many credits multiple times and had to buy them additionally, there are no prevention systems to setup to alert before it happens.
  • Some consumption is difficult to understand and requires time and digging.
  • It requires heavy internal effort to simplify things in Make in order for it to operate cheaper.
  • Initial IT setup is paramount and determines a lot.
Read full review
IBM
  • We never implemented Cast Iron in production. When compared to five competing products in the iPaaS space it didn't make it past the first few test scenarios we threw at it.
Read full review
ScreenShots